Hall v. Stone
| Decision Date | 20 April 1972 |
| Docket Number | No. 27001,27001 |
| Parties | Charlotte HALL v. Mrs. Howard STONE. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Alden C. Harrington, David A. Webster, Atlanta, for appellant.
Oze R. Horton, Hapeville, Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., Atlanta, for appellee.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court
This is a bail trover action commenced under the provisions of Code Ch. 107-2. The issue before this court is the constitutionality of Code §§ 107-201, 107-202, and 107-203. The defendant in the trial court filed a proper and timely constitutional attack on the grounds that those code sections violate the due process and equal protection clause of the United States Constitution. That contention was overruled by the trial court and the defendant appealed.
1. When the proceeding was first filed, the defendant filed certain defenses therein which did not raise any constitutional question. Certain motions were filed by the parties and rulings were entered with respect thereto by the trial court. An appeal was taken to the Court of Appeals which reversed the judgment and returned the case to the trial court for further proceedings. See Stone v. Hall, 124 Ga.App. 564, 184 S.E.2d 502. When the case was returned to the trial court, the defendant filed a motion to stay the marshall's seizure of property, which motion embodied, among its grounds, attacks on the constitutionality of the bail trover proceeding including a sufficient attack on the ground that the proceeding deprived the defendant of her property without due process of law. A hearing was had on that motion and an order passed denying the relief sought by the movant. That order was certified by the trial judge for immediate review. We thus have directly presented to us the question of whether Code §§ 107-201 through 107-203 violate the due process provisions of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution, and it is unnecessary to decide whether the trial court properly allowed an amendment to the defendant's answer subsequent to the entry of the order appealed from but before notice of appeal was filed. The motion of the appellee filed in this court to strike that amendment (assuming it to have been properly filed in this court) and to dismiss the appeal is denied.
2. Code §§ 107-201 through 107-203 establish the remedy of bail trover. They provide that where, in any trover proceeding for the recovery of personal property which is in the possession, custody or control of the defendant, the plaintiff 'has reason to apprehend that the said personal property has been or will be concealed or moved away, or will not be forthcoming to answer the judgment, execution, or decree that shall be made in the case,' he may make affidavit to that effect, including therein a statement as to the value of the property and that he does verily and bona fide claim said personal property or some valuable interest therein. When such affidavit is properly filed in the clerk's office of the court where the case is pending it shall be the duty of the sheriff to seize the property from the possession of the defendant or to require the defendant to give a...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Long v. Levinson
...Furniture Co., 315 F.Supp. 716 (N.D.N.Y.1970); Dorsey v. Community Stores Corp., 346 F.Supp. 103 (E. D.Wisc.1972); Hall v. Stone, 229 Ga. 96, 189 S.E.2d 403 (1972); Turner v. Colonial Finance Corp., 467 F.2d 202 (5th Cir. 1972 Miss.; Williams v. Berrey, 492 S.W.2d 731 (Mo.1973); Mitchell v.......
-
Brown v. Wilson Chevrolet-Olds, Inc.
...for distress warrant proceedings (Blocker v. Blackburn, 228 Ga. 285, 185 S.E.2d 56 (1971)), bail trover proceedings (Hall v. Stone, 229 Ga. 96, 189 S.E.2d 403 (1972)), possessory warrant proceedings (Roberts v. Macaulay, 232 Ga. 660, 208 S.E.2d 478 (1974)), and garnishment proceedings. Nort......
-
North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.
...v. Blackburn, 228 Ga. 285, 185 S.E.2d 56, which held that Georgia's distress warrant proceedings were unconstitutional and Hall v. Stone, 229 Ga. 96, 189 Olean Tile Co. v. Zimmerman, 317 F.Supp. trover statute was unconstitutional are not controlling here. In those cases, the property was s......
-
Johnson v. GLENN'S FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.
...trover. Ga.Code § 107-101. Small v. Wilson, 20 Ga.App. 674, 93 S.E. 518 (1917). But not bail trover. Ga.Code § 107-201. Hall v. Stone, 229 Ga. 96, 189 S.E.2d 403 (1972). ...