Hallon v. Center
Decision Date | 27 October 1897 |
Citation | 43 S.W. 174,102 Ky. 119 |
Parties | HALLON v. CENTER et al. |
Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
Appeal from circuit court, Clark county.
"To be officially reported."
Petition by G. T. Center and others against J. B. Hallon, county clerk, for a writ of mandamus. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals. Reversed as to some of the appellees, and affirmed as to others.
B. R Jouett and Beckner & Jouett, for appellant.
J. M Benton, for appellees.
Appellees alleging in their petition that at a primary election held September 19, 1896, under authority of the executive committee of the Democratic party of Wolfe county, they were nominated as candidates for various named offices, brought this action in the Clark circuit court, October 22, 1897, for a writ of mandamus requiring appellant, county court clerk to cause to be printed on the official ballots to be prepared by him and used in said county at the November election, 1897, their respective names, as candidates for said offices, as follows: G. T. Center, for county judge; J. F. Vansant, circuit court clerk; Silas Tutt, county court clerk; A. T. Combs, sheriff; Isaac W. Combs, jailer; G. W. Sally, assessor; John W. Taulbee, superintendent of common schools; J. W. Sample, coroner; John Creech, surveyor; John D. Row, Jr., justice of the peace; Preston Holland, justice of the peace; Peter R. Legg, justice of the peace; J. W. Drake, constable; Sylvester Norman, constable; James W. Rose, constable. On the same day (October 22, 1897), appellant entered his appearance, waiving service of notice; and thereupon, the parties consenting, the case was submitted for trial by Leland Hathaway, special judge. Appellant then filed a general demurrer to the petition, which was overruled; and, there being tendered by him no other pleading, judgment was rendered for the writ of mandamus as prayed for by appellees; and an appeal from that judgment having been granted, and the parties uniting in a motion to immediately docket and submit the case, it is now before this court for decision.
The sections of the Kentucky Statutes applicable, and upon construction of which the determination of the questions involved depends, are as follows:
Each of appellees filed with appellant, as clerk of the county court a certificate signed by G. C. Hunks, chairman, and attested by J. R. Carroll, secretary, of the Democratic committee of Wolfe county, showing that he had, at a primary...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Skaggs v. Fyffe, Judge
...of the Legislature that the election should be invalidated. Upon further reasoning, and the authority of Hollon v. Center, 102 Ky. 119, 43 S.W. 174, 19 Ky. Law Rep. 1134, the court held the provision to be directory and not mandatory. Construing the nominating petition in the light of the a......
-
Soper v. Jones
... ... directory. Stackpole v. Hallahan, 16 Mont. 40, 40 P ... 80, 28 L.R.A. 502; Hollon v. Center, 102 Ky. 119, 43 ... S.W. 174. "The people, on election day, will vote only ... for the candidates of their choice, and are not likely to be ... ...
-
Soper v. Jones, 4.
...have generally regarded such requirements as directory. Stackpole v. Hallahan, 16 Mont. 40, 40 P. 80, 28 L.R.A. 502; Hollon v. Center, 102 Ky. 119, 43 S.W. 174. "The people, on election day, will vote only for the candidates of their choice, and are not likely to be seriously misled by any ......
-
State ex rel Eastham v. Dewey
...certain number of days before election." State v. Falley, 9 N.D. 464, 83 N.W. 913; State v. Piper, 50 Neb. 40, 69 N.W. 383; Hollon v. Center, 102 Ky. 119, 43 S.W. 174; In re Cuddeback, 39 N.Y.S. 388; Griffin v. Dingley, 114 Cal. 481, 46 P. 457; Phillips v. Curtis, 4 Idaho 193, 38 P. 405. A ......