Halpern v. Halpern, 83-163

Decision Date16 August 1983
Docket NumberNo. 83-163,83-163
Citation436 So.2d 366
PartiesMargaret M. HALPERN, Appellant, v. Stanley N. HALPERN, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Young, Stern & Tannenbaum and Glen Rafkin, North Miami Beach, for appellant.

Carol R. Gersten, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ.

BASKIN, Judge.

In accordance with our concern for the substance rather than the form of payments made pursuant to a dissolution decree, regardless of the label of "property settlement" or "alimony"; and in recognition that the name assigned may not be conclusive of the question of the character of the obligation, see Underwood v. Underwood, 64 So.2d 281 (Fla.1953); Fagan v. Lewis, 374 So.2d 18 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), we hold that the sums referred to in paragraph 3 of the order portion of the Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage dated May 23, 1980, constituted alimony obligations enforceable by contempt and not a property settlement. Accordingly, we reverse and remand the cause to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing on the wife's motion for contempt.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Scharf v. Smith, 86-638
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 16, 1986
    ...but by what it does." Boyd v. Boyd, 478 So.2d 356, 357 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), review denied, 488 So.2d 67 (Fla.1986); Halpern v. Halpern, 436 So.2d 366 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).2 Specifically, the order required the disbursal to the trust of a specified portion of the payments on a promissory note g......
  • Pabian v. Pabian, 84-1986
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 31, 1985
    ...or maintenance then enforcement can be effected by contempt. McCombes v. McCombes, 440 So.2d 683 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Halpern v. Halpern, 436 So.2d 366 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). In Halpern, the Third District Court of Appeal, citing Underwood v. Underwood, 64 So.2d 281 (Fla.1953) noted that, in e......
  • Winset v. Fine
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 24, 1990
    ...provide for the support of the wife and the then minor son rather than to exchange financial rights and obligations. Halpern v. Halpern, 436 So.2d 366 (Fla.3d DCA 1983); Zuccarello v. Zuccarello, 429 So.2d 68 (Fla.3d DCA 1983); Johnson v. Johnson, 403 So.2d 1388 (Fla.2d DCA 1981); see also ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT