Halsey v. American Central Life Ins. Co.
Decision Date | 02 June 1914 |
Docket Number | No. 16686.,16686. |
Citation | 167 S.W. 951,258 Mo. 659 |
Parties | HALSEY v. AMERICAN CENTRAL LIFE INS. CO. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
An application for a life policy, dated May 24, 1906, recited that the applicant proposed to insure his life, and provided that the annual premium should be payable in advance on May 24th, that there should be no contract of insurance until a policy was issued and delivered, and premium paid, and that the application and policy applied for should constitute the entire contract. The policy, dated May 31st and delivered June 5th, when the premium was paid, recited that it insured the life of the applicant for one year from May 24th, and thereafter, in consideration of annual payment of the premium on or before May 24th of each year, until 15 annual premiums had been paid. Held, that the applicant was insured for one full year from June 5th, so that a tender of a second premium on May 31st of the following year was within the time fixed by the contract.
2. INSURANCE (§ 388*) — PAYMENT OF PREMIUM — AUTHORITY OF AGENT TO RECEIVE PREMIUM.
Where a life policy was issued through an agent and put into effect by payment of the first premium to him, a tender to him of the second premium was made to one having authority to receive it, and insurer could not, to defeat a recovery on the policy, deny his authority.
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court; William M. Kinsey, Judge.
Action by O. L. Halsey, administrator of Augustus C. Halsey, deceased, against the American Central Life Insurance Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
This was a suit on a policy of life insurance issued for the sum of $10,000 by the defendant upon the life of Augustus C. Halsey, deceased. A trial was had in the circuit court of the city of St. Louis, which resulted in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the full amount sued for and interest. In due time and in proper form the defendant appealed the cause to this court.
The pleadings are put aside, as there is no point made in that regard.
The cause was submitted to the court upon the following agreed statement of facts, viz.:
The material parts of the application for the insurance are as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Prange v. International Life Ins. Co. of St. Louis
...case decided by this court, Halsey v. Insurance Company, 258 Mo. 659, 167 S.W. 951, and cases decided by our courts of appeals which cite the Halsey case as authority for their The precise question, determinative of the case, is: When did the second premium payment become due? We will go to......
-
Broadway Laundry Co. v. New York Life Ins. Co.
...89 F.2d 256; Rosenthal v. New York Life Ins. Co., 94 F.2d 675; Cantey v. Philadelphia Life Ins. Co., 164 S.E. 609. (7) The holding in the Halsey case (258 Mo. 659, 167 S.W. 951) insured was entitled to a year's insurance in return for the first premium was predicated on conflicting and ambi......
-
McQueeny v. National Fidelity Life Ins. Co.
... ... 167, 44 S.Ct. 90, 91 L.Ed. 255; Secs. 3027, 3033, R. S. 1939; ... Stahl v. American Natl. Assur. Co., 70 S.W.2d 78; ... State ex rel. Commonwealth Cas. Co. v. Cox, 14 ... S.W.2d ... become a binding contract until the first premium was paid on ... July 19, 1923. Halsey v. Insurance Co., 258 Mo. 659, ... 167 S.W. 951; Howard v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 145 ... S.W.2d ... Brotherhood Railroad Trainmen, 80 S.W.2d 272; ... Johnson v. American Central Life Ins. Co., 249 S.W ... 115, 212 Mo.App. 290; Landrigan v. Mo. State L. Ins ... Co., 245 ... ...
-
Howard v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.
...controlled. The court said [290 S.W. l. c. 112]: "Plaintiff contends that the policy in suit is covered by the cases of Halsey v. Ins. Co., 258 Mo. 659, 167 S.W. 951; Johnson v. Ins. Co., 212 Mo.App. 299, 249 S.W. and Landrigan v. Ins. Co., 211 Mo.App. 89, 245 S.W. 382, and like cases. Thes......