Hamer v. State
Decision Date | 08 July 1912 |
Parties | HAMER v. STATE |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
[Copyrighted Material Omitted]
Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court; R. E. Jeffery, Judge; affirmed.
STATEMENT BY THE COURT.
Appellant Vol Hamer, was indicted for the crime of rape, alleged to have been committed upon the person of Charlie Holder, a seventeen-year-old girl. She was the half-sister of appellant's wife, and had been living with them since she was a small girl. His wife was sick and away from home at the time, leaving there appellant, Charlie Holder, and two of the children.
On the morning of the day upon which the rape was committed, in the evening, appellant sent these two children to the home of Will Beard, the brother of Charlie Holder. She went to church with Crawford Blakeley and Jesse Churchill, in a buggy, and returning in the afternoon, got out of the buggy at appellant's home at about 5 o'clock. Blakeley left his coat with her to be called for on his return, as he had to take the buggy to town and walk back, after taking Miss Churchill home. She went from there to the McNeeces to take supper with them, and appellant was also there. They ate supper, and then went back to appellant's house after sundown. She put away the milk and let down the windows and shut the doors on account of a storm approaching and then went to the room occupied by her regularly to retire. Appellant said he believed he would go to bed and went to his room.
The prosecuting witness said that, after she had gone to bed appellant came into her room in his night shirt and asked her to scratch his back, giving no reason why, but she knew he had been hauling logs and thought he had gotten chiggers on him. She got up and was sitting on the side of the bed, and he was kneeling down by the side of it, and she scratched his back. He said nothing afterwards, but grabbed her and threw her back on the bed, and then got on the bed with her. She remonstrated with him, begged him to turn her loose, reminded him of his wife and children, and told him that he ought to be ashamed of himself, and he said, "Damn them, I don't care anything about them or anybody else." He was over her at the time, and had hold of her hands, and she was lying on her back and fighting him and trying to get away. After the struggle, she turned faint and sick, and he carried her out into a little hall, and put her in a chair and went to his room for some camphor. She tried to get out of the front door, but he heard her and came back and jerked her loose from the door, and set her down in the chair, and then carried her on to the back porch. He rubbed the camphor on her face, and when she felt better he carried her back into his room, threw her on the bed and ravished her again. She stated that she resisted and fought all she could, and was trying to scream and make an outcry during the whole time, and She passed two other houses in going to her brother's, and upon arrival there appeared very much agitated, and told her brother and his wife that Vol had ruined her. Will Beard and his wife, and Crawford Blakeley who was staying at Beard's house, and the prosecuting witness went to Frank Parrish's, where she stayed, while the others went to town. She remained in bed until Tuesday afternoon. She stated: "The places where I was hurt when Vol Hamer was trying to have sexual intercourse with me were a place on my right arm up above my elbow, a blue spot on my throat where he choked me, and a blue spot over my left breast up above the breast, and some of my ribs on my right side were fractured, and my left hand was hurt, and my female organs were hurt."
Doctor Willis testified that he had been in the practice for twenty-six years, and had known Charlie Holder since she was a little girl; that he examined her on Monday morning, July 18; her pulse was 109, the normal being 72 to 74, and her temperature was below normal. The doctor said some of the spermatozoa was still alive, he thought.
Will Beard's wife stated that she and her husband returned home Sunday night, with Hamer's two little girls, shortly after the night service, about 10 or 11 o'clock, and found Crawford Blakeley in bed. That, while Will was still at the barn unhitching the horses and she was just ready to go to bed, Charlie Holder came in. That she was in her night gown, and looked like she was scared nearly to death. She reported what had taken place. The next morning Mrs. Beard examined her clothes, and found what looked to be three or four spots of blood.
Appellant testified that he and Charlie Holder ate supper at the McNeeces's on Sunday evening. That he had taken his two children to Will Beard's that morning to go to church with them, and that soon after supper Charlie Holder remarked that they would better go home and let down the windows, and McNeece and his wife said that it would be a good while before the storm broke, and they stayed and talked for something like an hour. That she persisted in going, and got up and started to go, although Mrs. McNeece insisted on her staying all night, to which she replied that she couldn't; that she had to go home and get breakfast,
Some remarks of the prosecuting attorney were objected to and objections were also made to the testimony of Charlie Holder that she made complaint of the crime to her brother's wife and stated that Vol Hamer had ruined her.
The jury returned the following verdict: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Pendergrass v. State
... ... which tended to prove that, if guilty at all, he was guilty ... of murder and nothing less. Beattie v ... State, 77 Ark. 247; Cook v. State, ... 80 Ark. 495, 97 S.W. 683; Sexton v. State, ... 91 Ark. 589, 121 S.W. 1075; [157 Ark. 379] Hamer v ... State, 104 Ark. 606, 150 S.W. 142; ... Wilkerson v. State, 105 Ark. 367, 151 S.W ... 5 ... Appellant urges, as a ground for reversal of the judgment, ... that the court erred in failing and refusing to correctly ... instruct the jury on the subject of the ... ...
-
Paxton v. State
... ... testimony was amply sufficient to show he did commit ... Pratt v. State, 51 Ark. 167, 10 S.W. 233; ... Kirby's Dig., § 2413; Skaggs v ... State, 88 Ark. 62, 113 S.W. 346; Green v ... State, 91 Ark. 562, 121 S.W. 949; Sexton v ... State, 91 Ark. 589, 121 S.W. 1075; Hamer v ... State, 104 Ark. 606, 150 S.W. 142 ... He also ... contends that, having admitted carnal knowledge of the woman, ... that the court erred in charging the jury relative to an ... assault with intent to commit rape. A man can be guilty of an ... assault with intent to ... ...
-
Joiner v. State
... ... sheriff of Pulaski County for service. The question of ... granting continuances calls for the exercise of discretion by ... the trial court, and, unless there has been an abuse of the ... discretion, the ruling of the trial court will not be ... disturbed. Hamer v. State, 104 Ark. 606, ... 150 S.W. 142; Striplin v. State, 100 Ark ... 132, 139 S.W. 1128; Jackson v. State, 94 ... Ark. 169, 126 S.W. 843; Bevis v. State, 90 ... Ark. 586, 119 S.W. 1131 ... The ... record does not show that the trial court made any order ... continuing ... ...
-
Pendergrass v. State
...State, 77 Ark. 247, 95 S. W. 163; Cook v. State, 80 Ark. 495, 97 S. W. 683; Sexton v. State, 91 Ark. 589, 121 S. W. 1075; Hamer v. State, 104 Ark. 606, 150 S. W. 142; Wilkerson v. State, 105 Ark. 367, 151 S. W. 5. Appellant urges as a ground for reversal of the judgment that the court erred......