Hamilton v. Palm Chevrolet-Oldsmobile, Inc., CHEVROLET-OLDSMOBIL
| Decision Date | 26 September 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 80-408,CHEVROLET-OLDSMOBIL,INC,80-408 |
| Citation | 388 So.2d 638 |
| Parties | Eugene M. and Sylvia HAMILTON, Husband and Wife, Appellants, v. PALM, a Florida Corporation, and Berry Brannon, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Bruce D. Frankel of Goldberg, Rubinstein & Buckley, Fort Myers, for appellants.
Lester E. Durst of Farr, Farr, Haymans, Moseley & Emerich, Punta Gorda, for appellees.
Appellants sued appellees charging them with deceptive trade practices under Chapter 501, Part II, Florida Statutes (1977), the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. The jury returned a verdict for appellees. The trial court entered final judgment for appellees and awarded them $5,500 in attorney's fees.
Appellants now contend that the court improperly included services of appellees' attorneys in defending appellants' claim of punitive damages. Under Section 501.2105 of the Act, appellees, as prevailing parties, were entitled to have the court assess fees in their favor. Attorneys for appellees, however, submitted an itemization which included services beyond the scope of proceedings under Chapter 501, Part II. It appears that the trial court included payment for these services in awarding fees. In doing so, it erred. Kittel v. Kittel, 210 So.2d 1 (Fla.1967).
Accordingly, we vacate the order awarding attorneys' fees, and direct the trial court to conduct a new hearing to determine a reasonable fee for appellees' attorneys based on their services in defense of appellants' claims under Chapter 501, Part II. Otherwise, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Stires v. Carnival Corp.
...a jury. See, e.g., SB TV, Inc. v. State, Office of Atty. Gen., 794 So.2d 744, 748 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Hamilton v. Palm Chevrolet-Oldsmobile, Inc., 388 So.2d 638, 639 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); In re Estate of Sanz v. Pershing Indus., Inc., 770 So.2d 1266, 1266 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Stewart Agency, ......
-
Maserati Automobiles Inc. v. Caplan
...Skidmore, Owings & Merrill v. Volpe Constr. Co., Inc., 511 So.2d 642, 645 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); see also Hamilton v. Palm Chevrolet-Oldsmobile, Inc., 388 So.2d 638 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); United Servs. Auto. Ass'n v. Kiibler, 364 So.2d 57 (Fla. 3d DCA Finally, we address Caplan's cross-appeal. Ca......
-
Heindel v. Southside Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.
...an alleged violation of chapter 501. In arguing for the necessity of apportionment, appellant relies upon Hamilton v. Palm Chevrolet-Oldsmobile, Inc., 388 So.2d 638 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980), and LaFerney v. Scott Smith Oldsmobile, Inc., 410 So.2d 534 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). In Hamilton appellants su......
-
Trumbull Ins. Co. v. Wolentarski
...not, the appellate courts will find an abuse of discretion and reverse the matter for a new hearing); Hamilton v. Palm Chevrolet-Oldsmobile, Inc., 388 So.2d 638, 639 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980) (vacating award of fees and directing trial court to conduct new hearing to determine a reasonable fee for......