Hamlin v. "Perticuler Baptist Meeting House"
Decision Date | 20 December 1907 |
Citation | 103 Me. 343,69 A. 315 |
Parties | HAMLIN, Atty. Gen., v. "PERTICULER BAPTIST MEETING HOUSE" et al. |
Court | Maine Supreme Court |
Appeal from Supreme Judicial Court, Cumberland County, in Equity.
Bill in the nature of an information by Hannibal E.Hamlin, Attorney General, against the "Perticuler Baptist Meeting House" and others. Addie E. Pingree, who was not named as a party, appeared and filed an answer with a demurrer. Decree for plaintiff, and Addie E. Pingree appeals to the law court. Appeal dismissed. Decree affirmed.
Bill in equity in the nature of an information brought in the Supreme Judicial Court, Cumberland county, by "Hannibal E. Hamlin, Attorney General, Farragut Post No. 27 of Bridgton, Grand Army of the Republic, Department of Maine," against "the property in Bridgton, Me., known as the 'Old Baptist Meeting House,' or 'Perticuler Baptist Meeting House,' Julia Kimball of Boston, Mass., Alimira H. Hall of Winnebago, Minn., and all persons interested therein." This bill was brought under the provisions of Rev. St. c. 16, § 33, which provides as follows:
At the proper time Addie E. Pingree or Boston, Mass., who was not named as a party in the bill, but who claimed title to the property, appeared and filed an answer with a demurrer inserted therein. A hearing was first had on the bill, answer, demurrer, and replication, and the demurrer was overruled pro forma. A hearing was then had on bill, answer, and proofs, after which the justice hearing the cause made the following decree:
From this decree the said Addie E. Pingree took an appeal to the law court.
The original deed of the "Old Baptist Meeting House Lot," as shown by a copy personally verified from record by the late Benj. C. Stone, clerk of courts, Cumberland county, is as follows:
The case appears in the opinion.
Argued before EMERY, C. J., and PEABODY, SPEAR, CORNISH, and KING, JJ.
Peabody & Peabody and Robert Treat Whitehouse, for appellant Addie E. Pingree. William H. Looney, for appellee.
On April 12, 1814, True Lovett of Bridgton, in consideration of the sum of $19 paid by Samuel Andrews and Jedediah Kimball, "a committ of the society cald Perticuler Baptist in said town of Bridgton, or their successors in that office for the time being," gave, granted, sold, and conveyed "unto the said Samuel and Jedediah" a certain tract of land in said town, "to have and to hold the aforegranted premises to the said Samuel and Jedediah and to their successors in office to their use and behoof forever"; the covenants being in the following terms: "And I do covenant with the said Samuel and Jedediah and their successors in office that I am lawfully seised in fee of the aforegranted premises; that I have good right to sell and convey the same to the said Samuel and Jedediah and to their successors; and that I will warrant and defend the same premises to the said Samuel and Jedediah, their assigns, forever, against the lawful claims and demands of all persons."
It is admitted that on October 24, 1807, "the First Perticuler Baptist Church in Harrison and Bridgton" was organized with 9 members, not as a corporation, but as a voluntary association for religious purposes. The word "perticuler" in that connection is supposed to mean regular or straight, in the same sense as these adjectives are sometimes applied to one wing of a political party in distinction from those who have seceded from the regular organization. The membership increased in 1812 to 30, and 1815 they erected a house of worship on the premises purchased the year before. In 1827 the Harrison members withdrew and formed a society of their own. The present building was erected in 1853, and up to 1870 regular services were maintained; but the society had begun to decline, and the last church record bears date 1873. The pew owners leased the building to the Christian denomination in 1873, and to the Free Will Baptist Society in 1880, by which society it was occupied for 5 or 6 years. The last survivor of the church was Rev. Jacob Bray, who combined in himself pastor, clerk, and sole surviving member. He died in 1882. During the 20 years following 1885 the property was unoccupied and was becoming wasted. The original trustees had died, no successors had been appointed, the church for whose benefit it was purchased had become extinct, and there was no...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Chouteau v. City of St. Louis
...title to such site. 8 R. C. L. 937, 1059, secs. 14, 109; Young v. Ringoes, 1 T. B. Monroe, 30; Chancellor v. Bell, 17 A. 685; Hamblin v. Meeting House, 103 Me. 343. There is nothing in the granting clause of the deed to indicate an intention to convey merely a base or determinable fee. Chal......
-
Chouteau v. City of St. Louis, 31497.
...site. 8 R.C.L. 937, 1059, secs. 14, 109; Young v. Ringoes, 1 T.B. Monroe, 30; Chancellor v. Bell, 17 Atl. 685; Hamblin v. Meeting House, 103 Me. 343. (6) There is nothing in the granting clause of the deed to indicate an intention to convey merely a base or determinable fee. Challis on Real......
-
Reid v. Barry
... ... 1156; Smith v ... Proctor, 139 N.C. 314, 57 S.E. 889, 2 L. R. A. (N. S.) ... 172. In this connection appellee cites the case of Hamlin ... v. Perticuler Baptist Meeting House, 103 Me. 343, 69 A ... 315. In this case, the deed did point out the beneficiary of ... the trust. It ... ...
-
State ex rel. Goddard v. Coerver
...Rochester, 57 F.2d 542 (W.D.N.Y.1932); Packard v. Old Colony R.R. Co., 168 Mass. 92, 46 N.E. 433 (1897); Hamlin v. 'Perticuler Baptist Meeting House', 103 Me. 343, 69 A. 315 (1907); Schaeffer v. Newberry, 235 Minn. 282, 50 N.W.2d 477 (1951); Ramsey v. City of Brookfield, 361 Mo. 857, 237 S.......