Hammond v. Eckerd's of Asheville

Decision Date07 January 1942
Docket Number108.
Citation18 S.E.2d 151,220 N.C. 596
PartiesHAMMOND v. ECKERD'S OF ASHEVILLE, Inc.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

Civil action to recover for alleged assault, false arrest and slander.

In the pleadings it is admitted that defendant is a corporation existing under the laws of the State of North Carolina, with its principal office and place of business in the city of Asheville, in Buncombe County, in said State, where it conducts a general drug business on Patton Avenue; and that on July 5, 1940, Richard E. Young, Jr., who is "the son of Richard E. Young, who is the sole manager of defendant corporation in so far as the conduct and operation of its business in said city *** is concerned", "was in the employ of the defendant".

Plaintiff further in his complaint, makes substantially these allegations: (1) That Richard E. Young, Jr., is a duly qualified agent, servant and employee of defendant, and "at times *** hereinafter complained of was the clerk in charge of the cigar and tobacco counter in the defendant's drug store, and was at said times acting within the scope of his employment and in the furtherance of his master's business"; (2) that on 5 July, 1940, as he, the plaintiff, "was in the act of leaving the store of defendant" which he had entered for the purpose of purchasing certain medicine, as was his custom over a period of years, Richard E. Young, Jr., "agent, servant and employee of defendant" as "clerk in charge of the cigar and tobacco counter in the defendant's drug store", "called out to him in a loud and angry tone of voice, ordering this plaintiff to halt and return and put down the cigars which the said Richard E. Young, Jr. *** accused this plaintiff of having stolen from the cigar counter"; (3) that though plaintiff heard the words of said Richard E. Young, Jr., knowing that he was innocent of any guilt in connection with the larceny of defendant's property, continuing on his way, proceeded out of the store in the direction of the sidewalk on north side of Patton Avenue, but before reaching the sidewalk--"defendant through its said agent, servant and employee," rudely seized this plaintiff's arm and stopped him, within the well-lighted front areaway of defendant's storeroom, and thereupon directly accused the plaintiff of stealing two cigars from the defendant's cigar counter; (4) that plaintiff, still knowing and realizing his innocence "advised Richard E. Young, Jr., *** that he had not stolen any of the defendant's property and shook loose the restraining arm of the said Richard E. Young, Jr., and proceeded on and out of the store", and, when he was immediately in front of and across the street from Imperial Theatre, he heard some one, whom he believes to be Richard E Young, Jr., cry out to a policeman "Stop that man, he has stolen cigars from Eckerd's"; (5) that pursuant thereto, "a police officer of the city of Asheville stopped plaintiff, and in just a moment" said "Richard E. Young, Jr., came upon the scene" and "demanded that the officer search this plaintiff *** because plaintiff had stolen two cigars from the defendant"; (6) that after admonishing said Young, Jr., to be certain of his accusations, and after said Young, Jr., had re-asserted that he was certain and had again demanded the search, "the said police officer subjected this plaintiff to a humiliating, embarrassing and entirely unnecessary search, and as a result of said search found no cigars of any nature or character whatsoever on the person, or in the clothing of this plaintiff"; (7) and that as a result plaintiff has suffered injury and damage in manner and amount set forth.

Defendant, in answer filed, denies the material allegations of the complaint, and as further defenses, inter alia, avers an express denial (1) that Richard E. Young, Jr., or any other person, while in the employ of defendant, and while acting within the scope of his or her authority, made any statements malicious or with any feeling to or about the said plaintiff; or (2) that this defendant, or anyone acting in its behalf, arrested plaintiff or caused him to be arrested. Defendant further avers (a) that such detention of plaintiff, as there may have been, was caused by an officer attached to the police department of the city of Asheville, for whose acts defendant is no wise liable; and (b) that such acts and statements of the said R. E. Young, Jr., of, toward, about and concerning plaintiff were contrary to defendant's policy and positive instruction, to wit, never to accuse or cause the arrest of any person on a charge of theft in or about defendant's retail establishment, and that such acts and statements of said Young, as alleged in this complaint, were and are outside the scope of his authority.

In the trial court, plaintiff as a witness for himself, describes the occurrence in this manner: "I was in their store in Asheville on July 5, 1940, *** to purchase medicine *** I bought and paid for the medicine *** After I purchased the medicine and it was delivered to me, along with the cash register slip, I came out of the store. Before I got on the sidewalk I heard somebody say 'Wait a minute'. It was the clerk behind the cigar counter who said that to me. *** When that young man said that to me, I did not wait, but went on down the street. I did not stop because I did not think he was speaking to me. As I came out I heard another voice behind me say, 'Wait a minute'. It was the man behind the counter, that young man over there that I just identified (R. E. Young, Jr.). I did not wait at that moment, as I just explained to you, but continued to walk on. Just before I did stop, the police said, 'You are wanted in the drug store' *** Well, I stopped and then the young man from the drug store said to put back the cigars that I had taken *** I am talking about that young man who was the person behind the counter *** I said to him that I had not taken any cigars off the counter. The young man said to put back the cigars that I had taken off the counter. He said, 'a couple of cigars', and I said that I had not taken any and that I didn't even smoke cigars. He said, 'Oh, yes, you have'. He said that the cigar box was on the counter near where I was standing and that I did take them. Then the police asked him if he was sure that I had taken the cigars. The young man said, 'Yes, go ahead and search him'. I was then searched. This took place I guess about ten or twenty feet maybe from the drug company,--from its entrance. I was on the street. I was across the street from the picture show on the same side of the drug store. It was about 9:10 o'clock at night. Lights were on in the store windows along the street. People were standing out in front of the drug company *** After I had been searched by the policeman with Mr. Young's assistance, they did not find any cigars on me. I had not taken any cigars *** the policeman was in uniform *** I was acquainted with one of the clerks in there *** He was on duty that night *** He had nothing to do and took no part in this occurrence on the sidewalk. After the occurrence on the sidewalk, this young man over there (indicating R. E. Young, Jr.) wanted to shake hands with me *** He said that he was sorry that he had made a mistake and begged my pardon."

Then, on cross-examination, plaintiff further testified: "I went to the store about ten minutes past nine. Was in there about three minutes *** I went in the front of the store. I got the medicine about middleways of the store. The cigar stand is up at the front. I spoke with the man that I got the medicine from, Mr. Weidle, but nobody else *** This young man (indicating Mr. Young, Jr.) was the one who was selling cigars *** I have seen him more times than one at the cigar stand. He sells cigars there behind the cigar stand. When I started out I walked by the cigar stand. After I passed I heard him speak. He asked me to wait a minute. I did not stop. I went out and he called again and asked me to wait. I stepped on the outside and went west towards Pritchard Park. Then I heard him speaking again, asking me to stop. The policeman spoke to me first before I stopped. I had heard it before, but I did not stop and did not pay any attention to it. It was the same voice that I heard inside the store. It was the same voice as I come out and the same voice as I got outside. The policeman told me that somebody wanted to speak to me. That was what called my attention to it. When the policeman spoke to me *** I turned and saw that he was the one *** He also told me that the box was full as I passed and that after I passed there were two cigars gone. Yes, I told him that he could search me *** When he said that he was sorry he made this mistake, he shook hands with me *** each of us went his way. I went home. I cannot say whether he went to the store or not. I did not know anybody else on the street besides the policeman *** Outside of the boy who came from the drug store, I did not see anybody speak to the policeman. Nobody else spoke to this boy who was selling the cigars except myself and the policeman. *** I have told everything that happened there *** My sister was the first person I told about having this talk on the street with this boy."

The police officer, John E. Cutsill, also as witness for plaintiff, testified: "I was going east on Patton Avenue and walking by the drug store. I noticed a man running (as later corrected--'walking pretty fast') out of the drug store and one of the clerks come out behind him hollering at him, asking him to stop. I finally stopped the man myself. The clerk (indicating Young, Jr.) said that this man had picked up two cigars *** The clerk said that he had a couple of his cigars and I asked him if he was sure that he had them, and he said 'Y...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT