Hancock v. Franks

Decision Date23 June 1982
Docket NumberNo. 63519,63519
Citation293 S.E.2d 353,162 Ga.App. 691
PartiesHANCOCK v. FRANKS.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Richard L. Moore, Robert I. Donovan, Marietta, for appellant.

William E. Cetti, Cartersville, for appellee.

SOGNIER, Judge.

Olivian Hancock (formerly Franks) and William Franks were divorced in 1974 and pursuant to the divorce decree, Hancock was awarded custody of their minor child Lori. On August 26, 1980 Franks filed a petition to modify custody alleging a change in conditions. The trial court entered a "temporary" order on September 24, 1980 awarding joint custody to Hancock and Franks and establishing the visitation rights of the parties. No attempt was made to appeal this order. The case was set for a further hearing on September 4, 1981. Hancock filed a motion to dismiss any further proceedings on the ground that the trial court's order of September 24, 1980 was a final order and that any proceedings following that order were a nullity. The trial court denied Hancock's motion and on September 14, 1981 issued a final order awarding custody of the child to Franks. This court granted appellant's application for discretionary appeal. We reverse.

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in entering the order on September 14, 1981 because the September 24, 1980 order was a final judgment disposing of the case. We agree. " 'A judgment fixing the custody of a minor child of divorced parents is a final one on the facts then existing, and any attempt by the trial judge to retain jurisdiction of the child is a nullity.' [Cits.]" Simpson v. Moon, 238 Ga. 152, 153, 231 S.E.2d 754 (1977). Any language contained in a judgment which purports to make the custody award temporary or retain jurisdiction in the court to amend or modify the award has no effect. Banister v. Banister, 240 Ga. 513, 514, 241 S.E.2d 247 (1978).

Appellee's reliance on Rowell v. Rowell, 211 Ga. 127, 84 S.E.2d 23 (1955) is misplaced because in that case the trial judge in the original divorce action had not entered a final judgment fixing custody but expressly held the matter in abeyance until a later date. Goodloe v. Goodloe, 211 Ga. 894, 897, 89 S.E.2d 654 (1955); Banister, supra, 240 Ga. at 514, 241 S.E.2d 247.

Thus, the trial court erred in entering the order on September 14, 1981 granting custody to Franks.

Judgment reversed.

DEEN, P. J., and POPE, J., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Hightower v. Martin, A90A1850
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 6 Marzo 1991
    ...by OCGA §§ 19-9-1(b) and 19-9-3(b), the trial court is without authority to enter a "temporary" custody award. Hancock v. Franks, 162 Ga.App. 691, 692, 293 S.E.2d 353 (1982); Draper v. Draper, 170 Ga.App. 727, 318 S.E.2d 314 (1984); accord Wilkinson v. Lee, 138 Ga. 360, 364(3), 75 S.E. 477 ......
  • Mink v. Mink, A90A0344
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 15 Mayo 1990
    ...contemplating its temporary nature, was a final judgment: Draper v. Draper, 170 Ga.App. 727, 318 S.E.2d 314 (1984); Hancock v. Franks, 162 Ga.App. 691, 293 S.E.2d 353 (1982); Simpson v. Moon, 238 Ga. 152, 231 S.E.2d 754 (1977); and the cases cited therein. What governed in those cases and g......
  • Draper v. Draper, 67929
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 24 Abril 1984
    ...for interlocutory appeal from that order. We reverse. This case is directly controlled by our decision in Hancock v. Franks, 162 Ga.App. 691, 692, 293 S.E.2d 353 (1982), in which we stated: " ' "A judgment fixing the custody of a minor child of divorced parents is a final one on the facts t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT