Hancock v. State
Decision Date | 08 July 1943 |
Docket Number | 14588. |
Parties | HANCOCK v. STATE. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court.
1. Under the evidence relating to the place where the alleged offense was committed, the jury were authorized to find that the venue was proved as laid in the indictment.
2. The judge charged the jury as follows on reasonable doubt Held, that this charge was not erroneous, as contended, on the ground that 'an actual doubt is not a reasonable doubt, but is greater and stronger than a reasonable doubt.'
3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Marlin Hancock was indicted for murder in the alleged killing of Hoke Mosley, and was convicted, without recommendation. He moved for a new trial on the general grounds, and by amendment added two special grounds, one contending that there was no sufficient proof of the venue as alleged, and the other assigning error on a portion of the court's charge. The motion was overruled, and the defendant excepted.
The following facts appeared without dispute from the evidence The defendant, together with Floyd Ward, Clarence Shepard, J B. Cole, and others, were at the home of the deceased, Hoke Mosley, on the night of January 17, 1943. Cole and Shepard had come to the place in an automobile belonging to Cole. About ten o'clock Shepard, Ward, Mosley, and Hancock, with three daughters of Mosley and a daughter of Hancock, left the house in this automobile and went to the store of Lee Shipp, where some of them purchased cigarettes and soft drinks. Clarence Shepard was driving, and in the front seat with him were Hoke Mosley, and Frances Mosley, 15 years of age. In the rear seat were Floyd Ward, Marlin Hancock, Josephine Hancock, age 13, and Merle and Inez Mosley, ages 8 and 12 years respectively. It appeared that the men had been drinking, but not that they were intoxicated. Before midnight, Shepard and Mosley were found lying in the road leading from the store to Mosley's home, severely wounded, as by beating. They were taken to a hospital, where Mosley died the following day. Shepard recovered. At the place where Shepard and Mosley were found were several bottles which had been broken and were covered with blood and hair, and an automobile lug wrench which was also bloody and covered with hair.
The evidence for the State tended to show that after the party in the automobile left Shipp's store, the defendant stated to Shepard that he wanted to drive the car; that the deceased objected, and these two 'got into a quarrel'; that the two younger daughters of the deceased, and the daughter of Hancock, became frightened by this dispute and left the car when it was 'slowed up'; that the car was later stopped by Clarence Shepard, the driver, for the purpose of letting the girls re-enter it, when the defendant struck him with a pepsi-cola bottle, and 'Clarence fell out of the car and Hancock commenced stomping his head'; that the defendant then struck the deceased in the face with a bottle, and also struck Floyd Ward as the latter left the car; that Ward and the deceased's oldest daughter Frances then went to a nearby residence seeking assistance, and after their departure the defendant further assaulted Shepard and the deceased with bottles and an automobile lug wrench; that before the return of Ward to the place the defendant had driven the car a short distance; and that he was listening to a radio thereon when Ward and others arrived.
Floyd Ward, after testifying as to what occurred on the night of the homicide, stated: 'This happened in Paulding County.' Clarence Shepard testified: As indicated above, the other evidence showed that when he was hit he fell out of the car; and it appeared also that the beating of Mosley occurred within about 5 steps from this point.
Inez Hancock, for the defendant, testified: 'I am 13 years old. I am a daughter of Mr. Hancock. * * * I went with my father and Mr. Mosley and Mr. Ward and Mr. Shepard and the little Mosley girls. My father and I went to Mr. Mosley's that night. After we got there we went to Lee Shipp's store in a car driven by Mr. Shepard. Those who went, besides Mr. Shepard and my father and Mr. Mosley, were Mr. Ward and Frances and Merle and Josephine, all Mr. Mosley's daughters. I didn't do anything at the store. We bought some coca-cola from Mr. Shipp. We started back home after that. I remember where Mr. Turner lives and where Mr. Bell lives. This trouble happened at the bridge just beyond Mr. Bell's house. There had been no trouble between Mr. Mosley or Mr. Shepard or my father until we got along there about Mr. Bell's house and the little bridge. Merle and Josephine got out of the car along about Turner's house. I didn't get out there. After they got out the car come on down there to the little bridge. After the little girls and my father and Mr.
Mosley got out of the car, that left Mr. Shepard and Mr. Ward and me and Frances in the car. Frances and Mr. Shepard were in the front seat. Me and Mr. Ward were in the back seat. After my father and Mr. Mosley got out, Ward pulled up my dress and felt of me under my dress. I went and told Daddy about it. He was just a little piece from the car when it happened. I went and told my father that Mr. Ward went and pulled up my dress and felt of me. After that, Mr. Ward went and got out of the car. Mr. Mosley got in the back of the car after he got out. My father was not in the car then. Mr. Mosley went and pulled up my dress. As to where my father was then, Mr. Ward went and taken him up above the car, he went toward my father, he went and told him he wanted to talk to him. After I called my father he came to the car. Then Mr. Shepard had a fight, he told Daddy he was going to cut him. Daddy went and hit Mr. Shepard before I left there, I don't know what he hit him with. As to whether he hit Mr. Mosley any time before I left, I left when it started, I got scared and left. I hadn't been out of the car until the row started.'
The defendant made the following statement: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cook v. State, 42661
...required to establish a motive beyond a reasonable doubt, since motive is not an element of the offense of murder. Hancock v. State, 196 Ga. 351, 357, 26 S.E.2d 760 (1943). 3. The trial court gave a lengthy pre-evidentiary charge, including an explanation of the stages of the trial. After e......
-
Hooper v. United States
...805, 67 S.Ct. 1187, 91 L.Ed. 1827; Hopt v. People of Utah, 120 U.S. 430, 439-441, 7 S.Ct. 614, 30 L. Ed. 708. 8 Hancock v. State, 196 Ga. 351, 26 S.E.2d 760, 763, 147 A.L.R. 1042; State v. Fox, 116 Kan. 180, 225 P. 1042; Soper v. State, 22 Okl.Cr. 27, 208 P. 1044, 1047; 23 C.J.S., Criminal ......
-
Cash v. State, 23401
...charge was approved in Sheffield v. State, 188 Ga. 1(1), 2 S.E.2d 657 citing Dumas v. State, supra. And in Hancock v. State, 196 Ga. 351, 356, 26 S.E.2d 760, 147 A.L.R. 1042, this charge in substance was approved, but the complaint made against it was not the same as was made in Dumas v. St......
-
Lathan v. State
...that this charge was misleading and confusing. The charge as given was virtually the same as that given in Hancock v. State, 196 Ga. 351(2), 26 S.E.2d 760, 147 A.L.R. 1042, and Thurmond v. State, 198 Ga. 410, 31 S.E.2d 804, that, if the jury believed that 'a reasonable man in a matter of li......