Hanna v. Eiche
Decision Date | 21 December 1934 |
Parties | HANNA et al. v. EICHE et al. |
Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
As Modified March 19, 1935.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Greenup County.
Will contest by Barbara Eiche and others against Frances Hanna and others to set aside the probate of a paper offered as the last will and testament of Carrie Pfaff, deceased. From a judgment for contestants, the contestees appeal.
Affirmed in part, and reversed in part.
Dysard Tinsley & Prichard, of Ashland, for appellant.
J. D Atkinson and A. V. Pollock, both of Greenup, and Browning & Davis, of Ashland, for appellee.
Carrie Pfaff, a citizen and resident of Greenup, Greenup county, Ky died testate on the 22d day of August, 1932. Her will was duly probated by the Greenup county court on the 5th day of September, 1932, from which order of probation an appeal was taken to the Greenup circuit court by the heirs at law of the testatrix, who are the appellees herein. Frances Hanna, one of the appellants herein, was named executrix of the will, but, being a nonresident of the state (residing in Portsmouth, Ohio), she was disqualified to act as such executrix, and Kendall G. Seaton was appointed administrator of the estate of the deceased, the testatrix.
The petition alleged: "That said paper is not the last will and testament of the said Carrie Pfaff, for the reason that said Carrie Pfaff, at the time said paper is dated, and was executed, and for along time prior thereto, was not of sound mind and memory, but by reason of age, illness and physical and mental infirmities, was mentally incapacitated from making a will, and did not at said time have such mental capacity as to enable her to know the objects of her bounty and her duty to them, or the character or value of her estate, or to make a rational survey of her estate, or to dispose of it according to a fixed purpose of her own; that said Carrie Pfaff was persuaded and coerced into signing said paper by the undue influence of the appellees and defendants, Frances Hanna and Dr. Raymond Hanna, her husband, and others conspiring with them, and by the false, fraudulent and collusive representations and coercive conduct and acts of said Frances Hanna and Dr. Raymond Hanna of undue influence over the mind of the said Carrie Pfaff, so that said writing does not, because of such undue influence speak her wish or will."
The case was tried before a jury, and resulted in a verdict finding the paper offered as the last will and testament of Carrie Pfaff not to be her last will and testament, but that it was obtained by undue influence. From a judgment in accordance with that verdict, this appeal is prosecuted.
The will is in the handwriting of appellant Mrs. Hanna, and she said that she wrote it without any assistance. She said she acquired her legal knowledge from her experience as a stenographer in law offices, and she also had training as secretary to a newspaper publishing company.
The will itself bespeaks legal knowledge and intelligence, and fairly warrants the inference that Mrs. Hanna is a woman of above average intelligence and business knowledge. In the peculiar circumstances, an examination of the will as a whole may be of importance; hence we here copy the will in full:
Carrie Pfaff, the testatrix, to whom we will hereinafter refer as Miss Pfaff, was the daughter of a German immigrant. She had spent her entire life in the home at Greenup which her father had purchased in 1868. She was never married. After the death of her parents, the family consisted of a brother, Christian, and a sister, Mary, both unmarried. The brother and sister died a number of years prior to the death of Miss Pfaff. Miss Pfaff was a woman of very meager education, and lived a very secluded life, seldom visiting any one, and had very few intimate acquaintances, and but little interest in people or anything outside her own home.
It appears that the acquaintance of Miss Pfaff with the Hannas began as a result of osteopathic treatments by Dr. Hanna of Miss Pfaff's brother, Christian, who died about 1928. After the death of Miss Pfaff's brother, the friendship between the Hannas and Miss Pfaff continued. However, Mrs Hanna testified that prior to April, 1932, she was never in Miss Pfaff's home more than a few hours, and that Miss Pfaff made only one visit to the Hanna home. At that time (March, 1932) Miss Pfaff was in failing health, and it appears that her illness began in the fall previous, 1931. It developed that she had cancer of the stomach from which she died August 22, 1932, at the home of the Hannas in Portsmouth, Ohio. The will was executed August 2, 1932, 20 days prior to her...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Martin v. Martin
... ... execution of the desired instrument must be relied upon to ... establish its existence, Hanna v. Eiche, 258 Ky ... 282, 79 S.W.2d 950; Stewart v. Douglas, 235 Ky. 121, ... 29 S.W.2d 637. Where one is physically and mentally infirm, ... or ... ...
-
Clark v. Johnson
...by circumstances leading up to and attendant on the execution of a will. Smith v. Smith, 243 Ky. 240, 47 S.W. (2d) 1936; Hanna v. Eiche, 258 Ky. 282, 79 S.W. (2d) 950; Page on Wills, sec. 744. The argument of the appellants is really not that there was any testimony of undue influence havin......
-
Jackson's Ex'r v. Semones
...194 Ky. 385, 239 S.W. 455; Burdon v. Burdon's Adm'x, 225 Ky. 480, 9 S.W.2d 220; Kidd v. Rodfus, 241 Ky. 133, 43 S.W.2d 501; Hanna v. Eiche, 258 Ky. 282, 79 S.W.2d 950. is not a suggestion in the record of any influence having been brought to bear upon the testatrix to bestow her estate upon......
-
Clark v. Johnson
...by circumstances leading up to and attendant on the execution of a will. Smith v. Smith, 243 Ky. 240, 47 S.W.2d 1036; Hanna v. Eiche, 258 Ky. 282, 79 S.W.2d 950; Page Wills, § 744. The argument of the appellants is really not that there was any testimony of undue influence having been broug......