Hannan v. Shotwell
| Decision Date | 28 February 1874 |
| Citation | 55 Mo. 429 |
| Parties | VALENTINE HANNAN, Respondent, v. WILLIAM H. SHOTWELL AND JOHN W. SHOTWELL, Appellants. |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Ray Common Pleas.
Doniphan, Garner & Dunn, for Appellants.
Black & Black, for Respondent.
This was a suit founded on a contract, and the balance claimed to be due was $420. The plaintiff had a verdict for $5.00, and the defendants thereupon moved the court to tax the costs against the plaintiff, on the ground that the amount of the recovery was below the jurisdiction of the court. This motion was overruled.
Ordinarily under the provisions of the statute, if the plaintiff in an action on contract recovers an amount, which, exclusive of interest, and aside from reduction by set-off, is below the jurisdiction of the court, the costs are to be adjudged against him. This is not the case however, if the court is of opinion from the evidence that the plaintiff, when he brought his suit, had reasonable ground for believing himself entitled to a recovery within the jurisdiction of the court. That the court entertained such opinion is evident from its action on the motion. The matter of re-taxing costs in cases of this sort, the law has wisely confided to the court which is conversant with the cause in all its details, and is therefore capable of forming a more correct opinion on the subject than the appellate court. (Johnson vs. Devlin, 31 Mo., 427.)
Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Roselle v. Farmers' Bank of Norborne
... ... indulged in this case. On the other hand the presumption must ... all be resolved in favor of the trial court. Hannon v ... Shotwell, 55 Mo. 429; Lewis v. Unnerstall, 29 ... Mo.App. 474; State v. Cunningham, 100 Mo. 382; ... Kennedy v. Nicholas, 29 Mo.App. 11; State v ... ...
-
Vineyard v. Lynch
...them against the plaintiff was evidence that the trial court considered that the plaintiff had reasonable ground to believe, etc. Hannan v. Shotwell, 55 Mo. 429. There is another statutory provision which may have some bearing on the point in hand, it is this: By section 3603, Revised Statu......
-
Voss v. McGuire
... ... Walton ... v. Walton, 19 Mo. 667; Johnson v. Devlin, 31 ... Mo. 427; Hawkins v. Nowland, 53 Mo. 328; Hannon ... v. Shotwell, 55 Mo. 429; Dupont v. McLaran, 61 ... II ... Whether or not appellant paid to the constable the amount ... he conceived to be ... ...
-
Owers v. Ingram
...that the court was of opinion that the plaintiff had reason to believe he was entitled to recover a sum within its jurisdiction. Hannan v. Shotwell, 55 Mo. 429. The court had no authority to set aside this judgment and render another judgment at the succeeding term, and its action in that r......