Hanrahan v. Hanrahan
| Decision Date | 17 May 1993 |
| Docket Number | No. 92-58,92-58 |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
| Parties | 18 Fla. L. Week. D1284 Michael E. HANRAHAN, Appellant, v. Marilyn B. HANRAHAN, Appellee. |
Alan Rosner of Harris, Guidi, Rosner & Dunlap, P.A., Jacksonville, for appellant.
Russell L. Healey of Lacy Mahon, Jr., and Mark H. Mahon, P.A., Jacksonville, for appellee.
This is an appeal by the former husband of a final judgment of dissolution of marriage that equitably distributed the parties' marital assets and liabilities and awarded the former wife rehabilitative alimony for support. Although the overall plan of asset distribution and support fashioned by the trial court appears to be reasonable under the circumstances, we find it necessary to reverse the award of rehabilitative alimony because the evidence and the findings in the appealed judgment are legally insufficient to support a specific plan of rehabilitation. Clance v. Clance, 576 So.2d 746 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). As this reversal of the rehabilitative alimony award will affect the overall scheme of asset distribution and support, we also vacate all provisions in the judgment effecting the distribution of marital assets and remand the case for further proceedings. See Wendroff v. Wendroff, 614 So.2d 590 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). The dissolution of the marriage is not affected by this appeal.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Oxley v. Oxley
...(Fla.1993); Ghen v. Ghen, 575 So.2d 1342 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); McLean v. McLean, 652 So.2d 1178 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Hanrahan v. Hanrahan, 618 So.2d 779 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Kanouse v. Kanouse, 549 So.2d 1035 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). In Steinberg, we recognized that, where there is no issue of ab......
-
Collinsworth v. Collinsworth, 92-1458
...determination in light of the final plan for equitable distribution and support to be fashioned by the trial court. Hanrahan v. Hanrahan, 618 So.2d 779 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Spillert v. Spillert, 603 So.2d 700 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Finally, Appellant contends that, given the inequitable distr......
-
Shiveley v. Shiveley
...v. Noah, 491 So.2d 1124, 1128 (Fla.1986); Collinsworth v. Collinsworth, 624 So.2d 287, 291 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Hanrahan v. Hanrahan, 618 So.2d 779, 780 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). Finally, we provisionally grant appellant's petition for attorney's fees and costs at the appellate level and remand ......
-
Brock v. Brock
...rehabilitative plan must be presented at the time the request for rehabilitative alimony is made. Berki at 534; Hanrahan v. Hanrahan, 618 So.2d 779 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). Since rehabilitative alimony is a projection based upon assumptions and probabilities, O'Neal v. O'Neal, 410 So.2d 1369 (F......