Hanson v. Hunter
| Decision Date | 11 October 1892 |
| Citation | 86 Iowa 722,53 N.W. 84 |
| Parties | HANSON v. HUNTER ET AL. |
| Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
On rehearing.
*85J. J. Mosnet, for appellant.
Tom H. Milner, Gilchrist & Whipple, and Smith, Remple & Lake, for appellee.
A rehearing of this cause was ordered on the petition of appellees, in order that the questions involved might be re-examined. We have been favored on the rehearing with additional arguments, prepared with much ability, and have again considered the questions presented with the care which their importance demands. The new arguments are in the nature of rearguments of some of the questions considered and determined on the first submission. We do not find it necessary to review them at length, for the reason that our re-examination of the case satisfies us that the conclusions announced in the original opinion are correct, and we think they dispose of all material questions involved. We adhere to that opinion. The judgment of the district court is reversed.
KINNE, J., took no part in the decision of the case.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Jack v. Village of Grangeville
...106 Ill. 337; City of Newport v. Newport Light Co., 84 Ky. 166; Hanson v. Wm. A. Hunter Electric Light Co., 86 Iowa 722, 48 N.W. 1005, 53 N.W. 84; City of Atlanta v. City Gas Light Co., 71 Ga. 106.) The contention of appellant that the ordinance and contract under consideration are in viola......
-
Van Horn v. City of Des Moines
...... subject of the ordinance. Dempsey v. City of. Burlington, 66 Iowa 687, 24 N.W. 508; Hanson v. Hunter, 86 Iowa 722, 48 N.W. 1005; Trout v. Minneapolis & St. L. R. Co., 148 Iowa 135, 126 N.W. 799;. State v. Nebraska Tel. Co., 127 Iowa ......
-
Van Horn v. City of Des Moines
...germane, to the subject of the ordinance. Dempsey v. Burlington, 66 Iowa, 687, 24 N. W. 508;Hanson v. Hunter, 86 Iowa, 722, 48 N. W. 1005, 53 N. W. 84;Trout v. Railway Co., 148 Iowa, 135, 126 N. W. 799;State v. Telephone Co., 127 Iowa, 194, 103 N. W. 120;Perkins v. Board of County Commissio......
-
Tomlin v. Cedar Rapids & Iowa City Ry. & Light Co.
...v. Runyan, 113 Iowa, 619, 85 N. W. 782;Dempsey v. Burlington, 66 Iowa, 687, 24 N. W. 508;Hanson v. Hunter, 86 Iowa, 722, 48 N. W. 1005, 53 N. W. 84. That a city may vacate streets and alleys and divert them to other uses has long been the rule in this state. Harrington v. Railway Company, 1......