Harbison v. School-District No. 1

Decision Date07 June 1886
Citation89 Mo. 184,1 S.W. 30
PartiesHARBISON and others v. SCHOOL-DISTRICT No. 1, ETC., SCOTT CO.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Marshall Arnold, for respondents, John N. Harbison and others. Mr. Hunter and Smith & Krauthoff, for appellant, School-district No. 1, etc., Scott county.

HENRY, J.

Plaintiffs sued to recover possession of lot No. 57, in the town of Benton, Scott county. The answer was a general denial, and a plea of the statute of limitations. On a trial of the cause by the court, without a jury, plaintiff obtained a judgment for one-half of the lot, and defendant has appealed. Plaintiffs' title is based upon a deed executed by Joseph Hunter, described in said deed "as commissioner of said town of Benton;" but there was no other proof that he was then (eighth January, 1840) commissioner of said town. The town of Benton was the county-seat of the county; and the deed recites "that the late commissioner for the location of the county-seat of Scott county, and for the sale of lots in the town of Benton, had previously sold a number of lots in the town of Benton at public sale, to different individuals, and that the county court of said county had subsequently, by its order, confirmed said sales, and ordered the present commissioner to execute deeds to purchasers of said lots, or their legal representatives, upon payment of the money bid at said sale;" and proceeds to convey the interest of the county in the lots so sold to the heirs of Thomas Houts, deceased. No particular lot is named. Other testimony was introduced by plaintiffs, who are the heirs of said Houts, which it is not deemed necessary to set out.

Defendant's testimony proved the order for selecting a school-house site in the town of Benton, made in conformity with the statute, January 2, 1872; the selection of lot 57; the record of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Hitt v. Carr
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • June 22, 1915
    ... ... County, Indiana, described as follows: "Lot one (1) in ... section thirty-one (31) in township thirty-seven (37) north, ... range seven (7), west, ... been proven, may give color of title. 2 C. J. §§ ... 367-371, pp. 190, 191; Harbison v. School Dist., ... etc. (1886), 89 Mo. 184, 187, 1 S.W. 30; Oliver ... v. Pullman ... ...
  • Ancona Realty Co. v. Frazier
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • September 5, 1931
    ... ...          H ... T. Alkire and Eastin & McNeely for appellant ...          (1) The ... action is at law, and it was error for the court to overrule ... defendant's objection ... Groves, 213 S.W ... 74; Stevens v. Martin, 168 Mo. 407; Harbinson v ... School District, 89 Mo. 184; Gaines v ... Saunders, 87 Mo. 557; Wilkerson v. Eilers, 114 ... Mo. 245; 15 L. R ... ...
  • Ancona Realty Co. v. Frazier
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • September 5, 1931
    ...R.S. 1919, sec. 1309; Benne v. Miller, 149 Mo. 228; Bevier v. Groves, 213 S.W. 74; Stevens v. Martin, 168 Mo. 407; Harbinson v. School District, 89 Mo. 184; Gaines v. Saunders, 87 Mo. 557; Wilkerson v. Eilers, 114 Mo. 245; 15 L.R.A. (N.S.) 1242 and note. (4) Defendant's ownership of the ori......
  • Benne v. Miller
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 31, 1899
    ...title calls for. Schultz v. Lindell, 30 Mo. 310; Norfleet v. Hutchins, 68 Mo. 597; Gaines v. Saunders, 87 Mo. 557; Harbison v. School Dist., 89 Mo. 184, 1 S. W. 30; Land Co. v. Hays, 105 Mo. 143, 16 S. W. 957. Where a claim to land is based on adverse for the statutory period without color ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT