Hardisty v. Woodward Iron Co.

CourtAlabama Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtBOULDIN, J.
CitationHardisty v. Woodward Iron Co., 214 Ala. 256, 107 So. 837 (Ala. 1926)
Decision Date14 January 1926
Docket Number6 Div. 462
PartiesHARDISTY v. WOODWARD IRON CO.

Rehearing Denied March 8, 1926

Certiorari to Circuit Court, Jefferson County; J.C.B. Gwin, Judge.

Petition of Maggie Hardisty for certiorari to the circuit court Jefferson county, to review the judgment and finding of that court in a proceeding under the Workmen's Compensation Act by petitioner against the Woodward Iron Company. Writ denied; judgment affirmed.

S.R Hartley, of Birmingham, for appellant.

Huey &amp Welch, of Bessemer, for appellee.

BOULDIN J.

That the death of the employee was "caused by an accident arising out of and in course of his employment" is a necessary condition to the right to compensation. When put in issue by answer, the burden of proof is on the plaintiff claiming compensation.

As appears from the foregoing statement of the case, the trial court gave a summary of the evidence on both sides relating to the controlling issue in the case, followed by his conclusion.

Appellant's argument is directed largely to a discussion of the weight of the evidence. It misconceives the duty and function of the appellate court in this class of cases. The case is not triable de novo on the evidence presented by bill of exceptions, nor reviewed even as the finding of a judge sitting without a jury in ordinary trials at law or in equity upon testimony of witnesses examined before the court. The proceeding here is by certiorari, in which a bill of exceptions is allowed as part of the record, not for the purpose of passing upon the weight of the evidence, but, in cases like the present, to determine whether there is any evidence supporting the finding of the trial judge. Ex parte Woodward Iron Co., 99 So. 97, 211 Ala. 74; Ex parte Gadsden Car Works, 99 So. 725, 211 Ala. 82; Ex parte Woodward Iron Co., 99 So. 649, 211 Ala. 111; Ex parte Nunnally Co., 95 So 343, 209...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
20 cases
  • Ex parte Trinity Industries, Inc.
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • May 3, 1996
    ...stated:"[T]he injury must be caused by an accident arising out of and in the course of employment to be compensable. Hardisty v. Woodward Iron Co., 214 Ala. 256, 107 So. 837; [ (1926) ] Jones v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co., 221 Ala. 547, 130 So. 74. [ (1930) ] For an accident to 'arise......
  • In re Death of Larson
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • July 29, 1929
    ... ... based." (Courson v. Consolidated Fuel Co., 121 ... Okla. 170, 249 P. 155; Hardisty v. Woodward Iron ... Co., 214 Ala. 256, 107 So. 837; Anderson v. Escanaba ... & L. S. R. Co., 234 ... ...
  • Alabama Textile Products Corp. v. Grantham
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • August 18, 1955
    ...the injury must be caused by an accident arising out of and in the course of employment to be compensable. Hardisty v. Woodward Iron Co., 214 Ala. 256, 107 So. 837; Jones v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co., 221 Ala. 547, 130 So. 74. For an accident to 'arise out of employment' the employme......
  • Woodward Iron Co. v. Vines
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • March 29, 1928
    ... ... action of the trial court "and no technical questions as ... to the admissibility of evidence will be here ... considered." Woodward Iron Co. v. Bradford, 206 ... Ala. 447, 90 So. 803; Ex parte W.T. Smith Lumber Co., 206 ... Ala. 485, 90 So. 807. In Hardisty v. Woodward Iron ... Co., 214 Ala. 256, 107 So. 837, the purpose or effect of ... the bill of exceptions is thus stated: ... "The proceeding here is by certiorari, in which a bill ... of exceptions is allowed as part of the record, not for the ... purpose of passing upon the weight of the ... ...
  • Get Started for Free