Hardware Mut. Cas. Co. v. Wesbrooks

Decision Date28 May 1974
Docket NumberNo. 8420,8420
Citation511 S.W.2d 406
PartiesHARDWARE MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, now Sentry Insurance, a Mutual Company, Appellant, v. Willie Grace WESBROOKS et al., Appellees.
CourtTexas Court of Appeals

Gibson, Ochsner, Adkins, Harlan & Hankins, Wayne P. Sturdivant, Amarillo, for appellant.

Fillmore, Parish, Martin, Kramer & Fillmore, H. Dustin Fillmore, Wichita Falls, for appellees.

ROBINSON, Justice.

The trial court entered judgment on the verdict for cross-plaintiffs, Willie Grace Wesbrooks, et al., in this workmen's compensation case. Appellant, cross-defendant insurance company, challenges by appropriate points of error the evidentiary support for jury findings that deceased, M. P. Wesbrooks, as a result of strain or overexertion in the course of his employment, suffered a heart injury on July 20, 1971, which was the producing cause of his death. We hold that the evidence is sufficient to support these findings. Appellant also challenges findings that $11,840.80 in medical and funeral bills were the result of the July 20, 1971 heart injury. We hold that the evidence is insufficient to support the finding as to $11,090.80 of such bills.

The evidence shows that M. P. Wesbrooks had had a myocardial infarction in 1960, but that thereafter he had lived a vigorous life and appeared to be in good health until July 20, 1971. On that date, while moving heavy jacks in the course of his employment for Wesbrooks Hydraulic Equipment Service Company, he suffered chest pains and difficulty in breathing. He complained that he was having a hard time breathing, and he 'complained with his heart.' After this occurrence, Wesbrooks was never well and was never able to do a full day's work.

On July 23, 1971, Wesbrooks saw his family physician, Dr. Lowry, complaining of chest pains and continued shortness of breath. Dr. Lowry referred him to Dr. Steve Powers for an electrocardiogram, which Dr. Powers interpreted as normal. Wesbrooks' symptoms persisted and Lowry referred him to Dr. Wayne Reser on August 6, 1971, for a lung examination. Dr. Reser determined that emphysema was not sufficient to cause the degree of symptomology experienced by Wesbrooks. On September 2, 1971, Lowry saw Wesbrooks, who was suffering from severe pain in his chest, cold clammy sweat, nausea and vomiting. He was admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, where he came under the care of Dr. Julian Sleeper, a cardiologist.

On September 25, Dr. George LeBeau, Jr., a cardiologist, took over the treatment of Wesbrooks from Sleeper. Except when he was on vacation, Lowry continued to see Wesbrooks daily. Wesbrooks was dismissed from the hospital on November 14, 1971.

Still under the care of Dr. LeBeau, he was readmitted on April 9, 1972, suffering from pneumonitis, an upper respiratory infection. Dr. Lowry testified that he did not follow Wesbrooks during this hospitalization. While in the hospital, Wesbrooks developed chest pains on April 14, 1972. He was diagnosed as having a coronary thrombosis, and went into ventricular fibrillation caused by acute myocardial infarction. The episodes of cardiac arrest continued until his death on April 30, 1972.

Appellant contends that no proper predicate was laid to show that Dr. W. P. Lowry had the experience or necessary training to speak as an expert in matters addressed to him and that his opinion testimony must be disregarded in determining whether the evidence supports the jury findings. Whether a witness is qualified to give opinion testimony as an expert is a preliminary question to be determined by the trial judge. El Paso Electric Co., v. Gambrell, 292 S.W. 577 (Tex.Civ.App., El Paso 1927, writ dism'd); Davis v. Cochran, 275 S.W . 423 (Tex.Civ.App., San Antonio 1925, no writ). His finding in that respect will not be disturbed in the absence of a clear abuse of discretion. Liberty Universal Insurance Company v. Gill, 401 S.W .2d 339 (Tex.Civ.App., Houston 1966, writ ref'd n.r.e.).

In the case before us, the parties submitted the entire deposition of Dr. Lowry to the trial judge so that he had before him all of the testimony in the deposition concerning Dr. Lowry's qualifications before ruling on the admissibility of his opinion testimony. The deposition showed that Dr. Lowry is a licensed and practicing medical doctor in Wichita Falls, Texas, having graduated from the University of Texas at Galveston with a medical degree in 1917, after which he interned at Cleveland City Hospital in Cleveland, Ohio. He is a general practitioner and has never run an electrocardiogram and does not interpret electrocardiograms. He has treated heart patients and had a 'lot of occasions' to diagnose heart attacks. He was Wesbrooks' family doctor.

It is not necessary for a doctor to be a specialist in the particular branch of medicine about which he is called to testify, so long as he possesses knowledge and skill not possessed by people generally. Utilities Indemnity Exchange v. Burks, 7 S.W.2d 1112, 1114--1115 (Tex.Civ.App., San Antonio 1928, writ dism'd); Beasley v. Faust, 217 S.W. 179 (Tex.Civ.App., San Antonio 1919, no writ); Pecos & N.T. Ry. Co. v. Coffman, 121 S.W. 218 (Tex.Civ.App.1909, writ ref'd); 32 C.J.S. Evidence § 546(92) (1964); 2 McCormick & Ray, Texas Evidence, §§ 1401 and 1427 (2d ed. 1956). We do not find that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting Dr. Lowry's opinions concerning Wesbrooks' injuries and their probable cause and effect. Any defects or discrepancies in the testimony itself did not relate to its admissibility, but were matters of the weight to be given the testimony and for evaluation by the trier of the facts.

The first question to be resolved by this court is whether the evidence is sufficient to support the jury findings that Wesbrooks suffered a heart injury on or about July 20, 1971, as a result of a strain or overexertion in the course of his employment.

Dr. Lowry testified unequivocally that as a result of moving jacks on July 20, 1971, Wesbrooks sustained an injury to his heart which was a producing cause of his death.

In answer to a hypothetical question, Dr. Sleeper testified, 'With the information given me I would state that it would be probable that he had a myocardial infarction on this date (July 20, 1971).' On cross examination, in answer to another hypothetical question, he said, 'I never definitely stated he had a myocardial infarction on July 20, 1971. The question was posed to me if it was possible that he could have had one then, and almost anything is possible in medicine, so that is possible.' Dr. Sleeper further testified that a person who has had a heart attack can have a normal EKG; that if one showed the same electrocardiogram to five cardiologists he might get five different interpretations running all the way from absolutely normal to positive and that because of this subjective element in interpretation, he would not rely on anyone else's interpretation of an EKG.

Dr. LeBeau testified that the blood vessels to Wesbrooks' heart were restricted because of pre-existing arteriosclerosis; that a strain caused by physical exertion would cause the heart to demand a greater supply of blood; that because of the restriction of the coronary arteries the supply of blood to the heart would be reduced; that if the heart did not get sufficient blood to supply its demands, damage to the heart could result; that it was possible that such damage would not be picked up by an EKG thereafter; and that damage to the heart would produce pain in the chest, shortness of breath, and dizziness. He further testified that Wesbrooks had given him a history of shortness of breath, chest pain, dizziness and weakness between the time he strained by picking up a jack and the time he came under LeBeau's care, and that these symptoms were...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. Thurmond
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • May 22, 1975
    ... ... Kneten, supra; Hardware Mutual Casualty Company v. Wesbrooks, 511 S.W.2d 406 ... ...
  • Burlington Northern R. Co. v. Harvey, C14-85-566-CV
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • July 31, 1986
    ... ... Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Wesbrooks, 511 S.W.2d 406 (Tex.Civ.App.--Amarillo ... ...
  • Lujan v. Houston General Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • July 6, 1988
    ...(Tex.1979); Texas Employers Insurance Ass'n v. Mitchusson, 515 S.W.2d 168 (Tex.Civ.App.--Eastland 1974, no writ); Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Wesbrooks, 511 S.W.2d 406 (Tex.Civ.App.--Amarillo 1974, no writ); Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Calhoun, 426 S.W.2d 655 (Tex.Civ.App.--Beaumont ......
  • Simpson v. Glenn, 8624
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • April 30, 1976
    ...witness need not be a specialist in the particular branch of the profession about which testimony is offered, see Hardware Mutual Casualty Company v. Wesbrooks, 511 S.W.2d 406 (Tex.Civ.App.--Amarillo 1974, no writ); Utilities Indemnity Exchange v. Burks, 7 S.W.2d 1112, 1114 (Tex.Civ.App.--S......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT