Hargrove v. Insurance Inv. Corporation
Decision Date | 05 January 1944 |
Docket Number | No. 8148.,8148. |
Citation | 176 S.W.2d 744 |
Parties | HARGROVE et al. v. INSURANCE INV. CORPORATION. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
One question is presented: Was the judgment rendered herein by the district court final for the purposes of an appeal? The Court of Civil Appeals held that the judgment was not final and dismissed the appeal. 171 S.W.2d 384.
While there were several preliminary agreements between the parties, the suit, as tried, is on a contract in the form of a note, with a number of additional provisions, whereby respondent, Insurance Investment Corporation, promised to pay petitioner, Mrs. Hargrove, the total sum of $31,771.20. The note was given in payment for 6,688 shares of stock of Teachers Annuity Life Insurance Company. It is payable in monthly installments, the first of $1,000 on March 16, 1942, and subsequent installments of $500 each on the 16th day of each month thereafter "until the several sums thus payable and like sums to be held and retained by the maker hereof on account of the pendency of the lawsuit brought by Santa Fe National Life Insurance Company against Teachers Annuity Life Insurance Company, in a district court of Bexar County, Texas, shall total the full amount of the principal sum of this note, to wit, $31,771.20."
The note provides that on the 16th day of each month the maker will credit on its books to Mrs. Hargrove a like amount to the amount payable under the terms of the note and that all amounts so credited shall be retained until final disposition of the suit brought by Santa Fe National Life Insurance Company and shall be applied, but not in excess of $17,500, to the payment of one-half of the amount of the judgment that may be recovered by the said Santa Fe Insurance Company against Teachers Annuity Life Insurance Company, the remainder of the retained funds to be paid to Mrs. Hargrove. The note further provides for maturity of all unpaid installments, at the holder's option, if any installment becomes delinquent and so remains for thirty days, and it is secured by the pledge of a certificate for 3,344 shares of the capital stock of Teachers Annuity Life Insurance Company.
The petition filed by Mrs. Hargrove and her husband, on which the case was tried, alleges the sale by Mrs. Hargrove of the 6,688 shares of stock of Teachers Annuity Life Insurance Company to Insurance Investment Corporation, the execution of the several preliminary contracts and the execution and provisions of the note for $31,771.20, above described, including the pledge of the certificate for 3344 shares of stock as security for the note. It alleges default in payments due according to the terms of the note and that the suit by Santa Fe Life Insurance Company against Teachers Annuity Life Insurance Company is still pending and prays judgment for the whole amount owing to plaintiff and for general relief. The supplemental petition, which the trial court at plaintiff's request treated as a trial amendment, alleges further defaults in payments due according to the terms of the note and plaintiff's election to mature the full amount agreed to be paid and prays for judgment for the whole amount evidenced by the note.
The trial answer of respondent, which was defendant in the district court, denies the plaintiff's allegations and prays for judgment canceling and holding for naught the contracts and instruments described in the petition. As grounds for their cancellation it alleges particularly that Mrs. Hargrove did not own 6,688 shares of the stock of Teachers Annuity Life Insurance Company but owned only 5,688 shares; that the contracts never became effective and the consideration therefor wholly failed because plaintiff verbally agreed that they were not to be effective until she obtained and delivered to defendant one thousand shares of the stock of Teachers Annuity Life Insurance Company then held by the Treasurer of the State of Texas and those shares were never obtained; that the contracts should be cancelled because plaintiff and her husband represented that Teachers Annuity Life Insurance Company was solvent and owned property worth at least $270,000, whereas in truth the corporation was insolvent and the value of the property was far less than that represented by plaintiff; and that the contracts should be canceled because they were never actually delivered to plaintiff but were left with her attorney with the agreement that they would be held by him until plaintiff procured the release of the one thousand shares of stock held by the State Treasurer.
The judgment of the district court, after recitals showing the appearance of the parties, the introduction of evidence and the return of a verdict favorable to the plaintiff, the petitioner, pursuant to peremptory instruction, contains the following paragraphs:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
...Comm'n App. 1920, holding approved) (citing Trammell for support of its presumption that the judgment disposed of a claim). 32. 176 S.W.2d 744, 746 (Tex. 1944). 33. 338 S.W.2d 945, 947 (Tex. 1960). 34. Gamble v. Banneyer, 151 S.W.2d 586 (Tex. 1941); Vance v. Wilson, 382 S.W.2d 107 (Tex. 196......
-
Ferguson v. DRG/Colony North, Ltd.
...final and appealable even though further proceedings will be required to carry the judgment into effect. In Hargrove v. Insurance Inv. Corp., 142 Tex. 111, 176 S.W.2d 744 (1944), the judgment stated that the plaintiff was awarded $15,800 and that defendant was indebted to plaintiff for an a......
-
Ellis v. Ellis
...sense that it is appealable despite the fact that further orders must be made to make its provision effective. Hargrove v. Insurance Inv. Corp., 142 Tex. 111, 176 S.W.2d 744. We overrule appellant's third We are unable to agree with appellant's fourth point wherein it is asserted that the e......
-
Schwartz v. Jefferson
...into execution in a manner which was consistent with the provisions and finality of the judgment. Hargrove v. Insurance Investment Corporation, 142 Tex. 111, 176 S.W.2d 744, 747 (1944); Ex parte Lohmuller, 103 Tex. 474, 129 S.W. 834 (1910). Judge Jefferson's subsequent orders relating to th......