Harmony Music Center, Inc. v. Railway Exp. Agency, Inc.
| Decision Date | 03 November 1961 |
| Citation | 230 N.Y.S.2d 50,35 Misc.2d 18 |
| Parties | HARMONY MUSIC CENTER, INC., Plaintiff, v. RAILWAY EXPRESS AGENCY, INC., and Electro-Voice, Inc., Defendants. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court |
Sidney Szerlip, Nyack, for plaintiff.
Orville H. Mann, Nyack, for defendants.
The defendant, Electro-Voice, Inc., has appeared specially to set aside the service of the summons on the ground that the summons was not delivered to a proper person in accordance with Section 229 (subd. 3) of the Civil Practice Act and on the further ground that the defendant is a foreign corporation not doing business within the State of New York.
Plaintiff alleges, by its process server's affidavit, that service was made on the defendant by serving the summons and complaint upon the purported Assistant Managing Agent of the defendant and that in the presence of the process server the purported Assistant Managing Agent gave the summons and complaint to the purported Managing Agent of the defendant. The affidavit of services does not state, however, that the process server knew the last mentioned person to be the Managing Agent of the defendant. The defendant, by affidavit of a corporate officer, avers that it does not employ any persons within the State of New York. In view of this affidavit and the process server's failure to aver that the person served, purporting to be the Managing Agent, was in fact known to him to be such, the Court finds that this was not service upon a person specified in Section 229 (subd. 3) of the Civil Practice Act.
In addition to this, it is established that the defendant is not doing business in the State of New York to subject it to the jurisdiction of this Court. The defendant is an Indiana Corporation licensed to do business in the State of Michigan; it owns no real estate, pays no taxes, has no bank accounts, keeps no corporate books or records and holds no directors' or stockholders' meetings in the State of New York; it has no samples of merchandise or equipment in New York; it employs no secretaries or stenographers in New York, and its letterhead and other advertising carries no New York address.
The only connection defendant has with New York is through its sales representative, the Carduner Sales Corporation, with offices at 80 Shore Road, Port Washington, New York. The office rental and the office expenses are not paid by the defendant nor does the defendant's name appear on the door. The Nassau County Telephone Directory lists the defendant at this address but the defendant does not pay for the listing, nor did it authorize the listing and, in fact, the number is that of the Carduner...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Weinberg v. COLONIAL WILLIAMSBURG, INCORPORATED
...is in no wise conclusive. E.g. River Plate Corp. v. Forestal Land, Timber & Ry. Co., supra; Harmony Music Center, Inc. v. Railway Exp. Agcy., Inc., 35 Misc.2d 18, 230 N.Y.S.2d 50 (Sup.Ct. 1961); Kane v. Stockbridge School, 33 Misc.2d 103, 228 N.Y.S.2d 904 (Sup.Ct. 1962). Of greater import w......
-
Bryant v. Finnish Nat. Airline
...in determining if the defendant is 'here' (cf. Zucker v. Baker, 35 Misc.2d 841, 231 N.Y.S.2d 332; Harmony Music Center, Inc. v. Railway Express Agency, Inc., 35 Misc.2d 18, 230 N.Y.S.2d 50) and not isolated Since plaintiff is a resident of New York the fact that the accident happened in Fra......
-
Librairie Hachette, S. A. v. Paris Book Center, Inc.
...874, 876). The fact that the foreign corporation may have a listing in the local telephone directory (Harmony Music Center Inc. v. Railway Exp. Agency, Inc., 35 Misc.2d 18, 230 N.Y.S.2d 50) or its name on the door of its agent's local office (Hamlin v. G. E. Barrett & Co., Inc., supra) does......
-
Goldstein v. COMPUDYNE CORPORATION
...27 F.R.D. 10 (S.D.N.Y.1961); Irgang v. Pelton & Crane Co., 42 Misc.2d 70, 247 N.Y.S.2d 743 (1964); Harmony Music Center v. Railway Express Agency, 35 Misc.2d 18, 230 N.Y.S.2d 50 (1961); See Lillibridge, Inc. v. Johnson Bronze Co., 220 App.Div. 573, 222 N.Y.S. 130 (1927), aff'd 247 N.Y. 548,......