Harper v. Hudgings
Decision Date | 28 March 1919 |
Docket Number | No. 19886.,19886. |
Citation | 211 S.W. 63 |
Parties | HARPER et al. v. HUDGINGS et al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Greene County; Guy D. Kirby, Judge.
Suit by Martha Harper and others against Francis Marian Hudgings and others. Decree for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal. Reversed and remanded, with directions.
The plaintiffs brought this suit in the circuit court of Greene county against the defendants to partition 120 acres of land situate in that county. It involves the construction of the last will and testament of William H. Hudgings, deceased, who was the common source of title. The decree of partition was as prayed for by the plaintiffs, and the defendants duly appealed the cause to this court.
The petition was in conventional form, and alleged that all the plaintiffs and defendants were children or grandchildren of said William H. Hudgings, and that they were tenants in common, and each was entitled to one-thirtieth part of said land; they claiming that they took per capita under the will.
Some of the defendants filed separate answers claiming various proportions of said real estate, and insist that the children and grandchildren of William H. Hudgings took under his will per stirpes, and not per capita, as claimed by plaintiffs.
Briefly stated, the facts were these:
The land consisted of 120 acres, and William H. Hudgings, as previously stated, was the common source of title, who died in the year 1886, testate. He had eight children, six of whom he left surviving him, five sons and one daughter, and two daughters who preceded him in death. The sons were William C., Ransome E., Jasper H., James H., and Francis M. Hudgings, and the daughter was Lodusky Caroline Hudgings, and the deceased daughters were Martha West and Sarah A. Nelson. Martha West was survived by her son and only heir, William E. West, and Sarah Nelson was survived by nine children, namely, Mettle Tilbury, J. D. Nelson, W. T. Nelson, Cora L. Whitelaw, Mary E. Nelson, Henry Nelson, Louis Nelson, Walter Nelson and Marian Nelson, her only heirs at law.
The portions of the will of William H. Hudgings which are here material read as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Chapman v. Chapman, 31117.
...(2d) 101. (b) The decree of 1918 is binding only on the parties to that suit. Matthews v. Van Cleve, 282 Mo. 19, 221 S.W. 34; Harper v. Hudgins, 211 S.W. 63. (4) Interveners are entitled to an allowance out of the trust fund of their expenses and a reasonable counsel's fees. St. Louis v. Mc......
-
Chapman v. Chapman
... ... (b) The decree of 1918 is binding ... only on the parties to that suit. Matthews v. Van ... Cleve, 282 Mo. 19, 221 S.W. 34; Harper v ... Hudgins, 211 S.W. 63. (4) Interveners are entitled to an ... allowance out of the trust fund of their expenses and a ... reasonable ... ...
-
Kinsella v. Kinsella
...Mo. 397, 78 S.W. 609; Thomson v. Butler, 136 F.2d 645; Wells v. Wells, 144 Mo. 198, 45 S.W. 1095; Parke v. Smith, 211 S.W. 62; Harper v. Hudgings, 211 S.W. 63. (3) A will is sui generis, statutory and in rem. Byrne v. Byrne, 250 Mo. 362, 181 S.W. 391; Ewart v. Dalby, 319 Mo. 108, 55 S.W.2d ......
-
Davis v. Austin
... ... 580, 222 S.W. 850; Lilly v. Menke, 126 Mo. 190, 28 ... S.W. 643; Johnson v. Johnson, 170 Mo. 34, 70 S.W ... 241, 59 L. R. A. 748; Harper v. Hudgings, 211 S.W ... 63; Thomas v. Black, 113 Mo. 66, 20 S.W. 657; ... State ex rel. v. Wolfe, 122 S.W.2d 909; White v ... Kentling, 134 ... ...