Harrell v. Beall's Dept. Store, Inc., 92-02204
| Citation | 614 So.2d 1142 |
| Decision Date | 12 February 1993 |
| Docket Number | No. 92-02204,92-02204 |
| Parties | 18 Fla. L. Week. D491 Edna Jane HARRELL and Roy Harrell, her husband, Appellants, v. BEALL'S DEPARTMENT STORE, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee. |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Florida (US) |
George L. Harrell, II of George L. Harrell, II, P.A., Fort Myers, and Gary A. Robinson, Bonita Springs, for appellants.
Gerald W. Pierce of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, Fort Myers, for appellee.
This appeal arises from an action filed by Edna Jane Harrell and her husband, Roy Harrell, for injuries allegedly sustained by Edna while a customer in Beall's Department Store, Inc. After thorough consideration of this matter, we have determined that the trial court erred in directing a verdict for Beall's. Hence, we reverse and remand for a new trial.
Edna, age 69, entered Beall's and stopped at a counter to look at earrings displayed on a vertical rack. According to her version of the event, she attempted to turn the display, but upon touching it, it toppled from the glass counter and knocked her to the floor. She complained of pain in her lower back and left knee and entered the hospital. Her treating physician testified that as a result of the fall, Edna sustained a 20% disability to her left knee. Prior to the episode at Beall's, however, Edna had surgically received a prosthetic knee to remedy a severe arthritic condition.
The Harrells filed a claim against Beall's for its alleged failure "to properly mount the earring display rack on its merchandise sales counter ... [and] to inspect the ... rack and its connection to the merchandise counter...." At trial, Eugene McDowell, a former Beall's employee and its witness, testified that he saw Edna fall. He specifically recalled observing Edna "reaching for the earring spindle and I couldn't tell if she was either leaning on the table or whether she pulled the earring spindle toward her which caused it to slide off the table." There were no other eyewitnesses. McDowell's testimony contradicted Edna's. She insisted that her mere touch caused the rack to collapse and fall from the counter, striking her on the back and knocking her to the floor.
At the conclusion of all the testimony, the trial court rejected the Harrells' request for a res ipsa loquitur instruction and granted Beall's motion for a directed verdict. We are persuaded that the trial court did not err in declining to instruct the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Markowitz v. Helen Homes of Kendall Corp.
...manner, and at a particular location thus causing a dangerous condition to exist is a jury question."); Harrell v. Beall's Dep't Store, Inc., 614 So.2d 1142, 1143 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) (whether a department store created a dangerous condition by the manner in which it mounted a display rack is......
-
Khorran v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.
...manner, and at a particular location thus causing a dangerous condition to exist is a jury question."); Harrell v. Beall's Dep't Store, Inc., 614 So.2d 1142, 1143 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) (whether a department store created a dangerous condition by the manner in which it mounted a display rack is......
-
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Rogers, WAL-MART
...manner, and at a particular location thus causing a dangerous condition to exist is a jury question"); Harrell v. Beall's Dep't Store, Inc., 614 So.2d 1142 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) (whether a department store created a dangerous condition by the manner in which it mounted a display rack is a jury......
-
Peuser v. Wal-Mart Stores E., LP
...like most negligence cases, is replete with issues of fact that must be resolved by a jury. See, e.g., Harrell v. Beall's Dep't Store, Inc., 614 So. 2d 1142, 1143 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) (reversing grant of directed verdict for defendant in case involving falling earring display, noting that "th......