Harrington v. Worcester
Decision Date | 05 January 1893 |
Citation | 32 N.E. 955,157 Mass. 579 |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Parties | HARRINGTON v. WORCESTER, L. & S. ST. RY. CO., (two cases.) |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Exceptions from superior court, Worcester county; ELISHA B. MAYNARD, Judge.
Actions by Calista E. Harrington against the Worcester, Leicester & Spencer Street-Railway Company, and Leonard Harrington against same. Motions to set aside verdicts for defendant were allowed, and defendant excepts. Exceptions overruled.
The following are defendant's exceptions:
F.P. Goulding and C.R. Johnson, for plaintiff.
F.A. Gaskill and B.W. Potter, for defendant.
A motion for a new trial is addressed to the discretion of the justice presiding at the trial, and his decision is final upon all questions of fact. But questions of law which arise for the first time at the hearing upon the motion, relating to the competency of the evidence or the rulings of the justice, may be revised by this court. Woodward v. Leavitt, 107 Mass. 453, 460; Pub.St. c. 153, § 8.
The question to the juror was properly excluded. The rule was thus stated in Woodward v. Leavitt, by Mr. Justice GRAY: “A juryman may testify to any facts bearing upon the question of the existence of the disturbing influence, but he cannot be permitted to testify how far that influence operated upon his mind.” See, also, ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Com. v. Scanlan
...denied, 439 U.S. 899, 99 S.Ct. 265, 58 L.Ed.2d 247 (1978); unauthorized views by the jury, Harrington v. Worcester, Leicester, & Spencer St. Ry., 157 Mass. 579, 581-583, 32 N.E. 955 (1893); facts communicated by a third party, People v. Hutchinson, 71 Cal.2d 342, 349-351, 78 Cal.Rptr. 196, ......
-
Commonwealth v. Miller
...been brought into the jury deliberation room. Fidler, 377 Mass. at 201, 385 N.E.2d 513. See Harrington v. Worcester, Leicester & Spencer St. Ry. Co., 157 Mass. 579, 581–582, 32 N.E. 955 (1893) ; Commonwealth v. Scanlan, 9 Mass.App.Ct. 173, 184, 400 N.E.2d 1265 (1980). A judge hearing a moti......
-
Com. v. Philyaw
...of an unauthorized view by one or more jurors has long been considered an extraneous matter, Harrington v. Worcester, Leicester & Spencer St. Ry., 157 Mass. 579, 581-583, 32 N.E. 955 (1893), and one which is of a "very serious" nature. Markee v. Biasetti, 410 Mass. 785, 788, 575 N.E.2d 1083......
-
Com. v. Cuffie
...788, 575 N.E.2d 1083; Berlandi v. Commonwealth, 314 Mass. 424, 451-452, 50 N.E.2d 210 (1943); Harrington v. Worcester, Leicester, & Spencer St. Ry., 157 Mass. 579, 582-583, 32 N.E. 955 (1893). The judge assumed for purposes of the defendant's motion to interview juror B that the alleged vis......