Harris County v. Charlton
Decision Date | 24 June 1922 |
Docket Number | (No. 3636.) |
Citation | 243 S.W. 459 |
Parties | HARRIS COUNTY v. CHARLTON et al. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Action by the County of Harris against James Charlton and others. From a judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals (228 S. W. 969) reversing a judgment in its favor, plaintiff brings error. Affirmed.
See, also, 243 S. W. 460.
Louis, Campbell & Nicholson, of Houston, for plaintiff in error.
Geo. L. Charlton and Carothers & Brown, all of Houston, for defendants in error.
The Court of Civil Appeals gives a concise statement of the case, as follows:
The honorable Court of Civil Appeals reversed the judgment of the trial court and rendered judgment for the defendants in error.
A law creating the office of county treasurer was first enacted in 1846. The Legislature, instead of itself fixing that officer's salary or compensation, delegated that authority to the county court. Briefly following this office and the compensation allowed through the enactments of 1876, 1879, and 1891, to the present law as found in Vernon's Sayles' Texas Civil Statutes, arts. 3873, 3874, and 3875, it is apparent that now, as at the beginning, the Legislature provided that the county commissioners' court shall fix the commissions allowed to the county treasurer for collecting county funds and public free school funds, and fixed a limit as to the per cent. of commission that may be allowed by the commissioners' court for handling these two funds, and also limited the total amount to be so allowed per...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bitter v. Bexar County
...the date of payments and the filing of his cross-bill. Nelson v. S. A. Trac. Co., 107 Tex. 180, 175 S. W. 434; Harris County v. Charlton, 111 Tex. 588, 243 S. W. 459; Harris County v. James Charlton, County Treasurer, et al., 112 Tex. 19, 243 S. W. In respect to appellee's suit to recover a......
-
Settegast v. Harris County
...of McKinney et al. v. Robinson, 84 Tex. 489, 19 S.W. 699; Charlton et al. v. Harris County, Tex.Civ.App., 228 S.W. 969, affirmed 111 Tex. 588, 243 S.W. 459; and Hillman v. Gallagher, 103 Tex. 427, 128 S.W. The 2-year statute of limitation applies, we think, with respect to the liability of ......
-
Robinson v. Wichita County, 13549.
...County, 111 Tex. 50, 228 S.W. 547; Charlton v. Harris County (Tex.Civ. App.) 228 S.W. 969, affirmed by the Supreme Court in 111 Tex. 588, 243 S.W. 459. For the reasons indicated, the judgment of the trial court is reversed in its entirety and judgment is here rendered in favor of the New Yo......
-
Throckmorton County v. Thompson
...McKinney et al. v. Robinson, 84 Tex. 489, 19 S.W. 699; Charlton et al. v. Harris County, Tex.Civ. App., 228 S.W. 969, affirmed 111 Tex. 588, 243 S.W. 459; Hillman v. Gallagher, 103 Tex. 427, 128 S.W. For the reasons herein stated, the judgments of the trial court and of the Court of Civil A......