Harris v. Edmonds, 44065

Decision Date05 March 1969
Docket NumberNo. 44065,No. 1,44065,1
PartiesJack HARRIS, Foreman v. J. E. EDMONDS
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Burruss, Bell & Nylen, Stanley H. Nylen, Atlanta, for appellant.

Hutcheson, Kilpatrick, Watson, Crumbley & Brown, John L. Watson, Jr., Jonesboro, for appellee.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court

FELTON, Chief Judge.

J. E. Edmonds filed a complaint against Jack Harris, foreman of the Clayton County grand jury for the May term, 1968, seeking to have certain matter expunged from said grand jury's presentments, pursuant to which the court expunged the following: 'J. E. Edmonds, Clayton County Superintendent of Schools, was asked to co-operate in this investigation and correct an improper situation, he chose instead to be unco-operative and threatening to the extent of stating what he could and would do to the person and children of the foreman of this grand jury since the foreman's children attended public school in Clayton County, further stated that he would have him (foreman) thrown out, if he made any further attempt to enter the superintendent's office. If this man feels that he has this much authority to make threats on a grand jury, then we do not need a grand jury in this county.'

The grand jury had no right to return the report charging or casting reflections of misconduct in office upon the appellee public officer or impugning his character, without a presentment or true bill of indictment charging him with a specific offense against the State; and it is the right of the appellee, who is the subject of such extra-judicial report, to have it expunged from the official records. Kelley v. Tanksley, 105 Ga.App. 65, 123 S.E.2d 462. Therefore, the court did not err in its orders overruling appellant's motions, to dissolve a temporary restraining order against the publishing of the presentments and to dismiss the complaint, and its judgment directing the clerk of the court to expunge said portion of the presentments from the record.

Judgment affirmed.

EBERHARDT and WHITMAN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Simington v. Shimp
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • December 15, 1978
    ...Jones v. People (1905), 101 App.Div. 55, 92 N.Y.S. 275.7 E. g., Ex parte Burns (1954), 261 Ala. 217, 73 So.2d 912; Harris v. Edmonds (1969), 119 Ga.App. 305, 166 S.E.2d 909; In re Brevard County Grand Jury Interim Report (Fla.1971), 249 So.2d 709.8 Irwin v. Murphy (1933), 129 Cal.App. 713, ......
  • IN RE JULY-AUGUST, 2003 DEKALB CTY.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • February 26, 2004
    ...362 S.E.2d 432 (1987); In re Gwinnett County Grand Jury Proceedings, 180 Ga.App. 241, 242, 348 S.E.2d 757 (1986); Harris v. Edmonds, 119 Ga.App. 305, 166 S.E.2d 909 (1969); Kelley v. Tanksley, 105 Ga.App. 65, 66, 123 S.E.2d 462 Case No. A04A0501 2. The CEO cross-appealed to have this Court ......
  • State Highway Dept. v. Howard
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • March 5, 1969
  • Report of Grand Jury of Carroll County, November Term, 1976, In re
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • November 1, 1976
    ...in recent years continue to follow an approach similar to that adopted by the Court of Appeals of Maryland. See Harris v. Edmonds, 119 Ga.App. 305, 166 S.E.2d 909 (1969); In re Brevard County Grand Jury Interim Report, 249 So.2d 709 (Fla.App.1971); In re Davis, 257 So.2d 884 (Miss.1972); In......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT