Harris v. Gibson

Citation322 F.2d 780
Decision Date12 September 1963
Docket NumberNo. 20871.,20871.
PartiesCarolyn Eleanor HARRIS, a minor, by Taylor Harris, her guardian and next friend, et al., Appellants-Intervenors, v. Linda Sue GIBSON and Brenda Gibson, minors, by Thomas L. Gibson, their father and next friend, and Thomas L. Gibson, individually, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Glynn County Board of Education, a public body existing under the laws of Georgia, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Constance Baker Motley, New York City, Donald L. Hollowell, Horace T. Ward, Atlanta, Ga., for appellants.

Carter Pittman, Dalton, Ga., Geo. L. Leonard, Washington, D. C., B. N. Nightingale, Brunswick, Ga., Barrie L. Jones, Alma, Ga., Alan B. Smith, Brunswick, Ga., for appellees.

Before RIVES, BROWN, and BELL, Circuit Judges.

GRIFFIN B. BELL, Circuit Judge.

The minor appellants are six Negro children presently enrolled in the public schools of Glynn County, Georgia. An application for transfer from the Negro high school to Glynn Academy, the white high school in Glynn County on behalf of each minor appellant, some to the eleventh and some to the twelfth grades, was granted by the appellee Board of Education for the 1963-64 school year which commenced on August 28, 1963. On August 27, 1963, the appellee-plaintiffs secured from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia a temporary restraining order, without notice, enjoining the appellee Board of Education from permitting the transfers. On September 6, 1963 that court entered an order styled a "pretrial order", the effect of which was to continue the temporary restraining order in force to the end of preventing the transfers. Because of this action of the District Court the Board of Education has been prevented from going forward with its voluntary plan of desegregation.

The "pre-trial" order of September 6, 1963 was, in effect, the granting of a preliminary injunction. Our jurisdiction in this regard is based on 28 U.S.C.A. § 1292, Sims v. Greene, 3 Cir., 1947, 160 F.2d 512. See also Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. v. Randolph, 8 Cir., 1950, 182 F.2d 996. We have the power to grant any necessary relief to prevent irreparable damage to the minor appellants, Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 1651. The "pre-trial" order is also a final order within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.A. § 1291 in that it determines substantial rights of the six minor Negro children, and these rights will be irreparably lost if relief is delayed pending final judgment. See United States v. Wood, 5 Cir., 1961, 295 F.2d 772, 778; cert. den., 369 U.S. 850, 82 S.Ct. 933, 8 L.Ed.2d 9; Kennedy v. Lynd, 5 Cir., 1962, 306 F.2d 222, 228; Hodges v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co., 5 Cir., 1962, 310 F.2d 438, 443.

Under the school segregation cases, Brown v. Board of Education, 1954, 347 U.S. 483, 74 S.Ct. 686, 98 L.Ed. 873; 349 U.S. 294, 75 S.Ct. 753, 99 L. Ed. 1083; Cooper v. Aaron, 1958, 358 U. S. 1, 78 S.Ct. 1401, 3 L.Ed.2d 5, the irreparable damage being sustained by appellants consists of being forced to attend a racially segregated school. No comparable injury will be suffered by the appellee-plaintiffs if the motion for injunction pending appeal is granted. This court is of the opinion that there is a strong probability that the appellant-intervenors will ultimately prevail on this appeal on the merits although that question is not now decided.

It follows from what we...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Kelley v. METROPOLITAN CTY. BD. OF ED. OF NASHVILLE, TENN.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • December 18, 1970
    ...§ 1291. United States v. Lynd, 301 F.2d 818 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 893, 83 S.Ct. 187, 9 L.Ed.2d 125 (1962); Harris v. Gibson, 322 F.2d 780 (5th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 908, 84 S.Ct. 661, 11 L.Ed.2d 606 (1964). This view is, we believe, entirely consistent with settled......
  • Spangler v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • August 28, 1969
    ...order that decides only one thing — that the case should go to trial." Id., p. 25, 87 S.Ct. at p. 195. However, in Harris v. Gibson (5 Cir. 1963) 322 F.2d 780, a pretrial order which had the effect of continuing a temporary restraining order against the school board restraining transfer of ......
  • Hines v. D'Artois
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • May 13, 1976
    ...Fund Insurance Co., 10 Cir. 1962, 307 F.2d 413, cert. denied, 1963, 371 U.S. 950, 83 S.Ct. 505, 9 L.Ed.2d 499. Cf. Harris v. Gibson, 5 Cir. 1963, 322 F.2d 780 (finding jurisdiction under §§ 1291, 1292 and 1651 over a district court's 'pre-trial order' enjoining the transfer of black student......
  • McSurely v. McClellan
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • March 26, 1970
    ...will be irreparably lost should be granted the status of a final order appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1964). Harris v. Gibson, 322 F.2d 780 (5th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 908, 84 S.Ct. 661, 11 L.Ed.2d 606 (1964); United States v. Wood, 295 F.2d 772 (5th Cir. 1961), cert. denied......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT