Harris v. William R. Compton Bond & Mortgage Co.
Decision Date | 02 July 1912 |
Parties | HARRIS v. WILLIAM R. COMPTON BOND & MORTGAGE CO. et al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Rev. St. 1909, §§ 10,576-10,610, provide for the creation of special road districts, and declare that the incorporation of such district shall not apply to counties under township organization; and section 10,577, Laws of 1911, p. 370, § 1, declares that every district so organized shall be a body corporate, to be known as the road district of such county as may be designated by the county court, provides for the appointment off a board of commissioners, with exclusive control over all public highways within the district outside the limits of any city or village, and empowers the board to levy and collect road taxes and to issue bonds, and in effect transfers from the county authorities all their previous authority over roads and confers it upon the board. Const. art. 6, § 36, provides that in each county there shall be a county court, with jurisdiction to transact all county business as prescribed by law. Article 10, § 11, provides that the valuation of property for taxes levied for county, city, town, and school purposes shall not exceed the value of the same property for state and county purposes. Section 12 provides that no county, city, town, school district, "or other political corporation or subdivision of the state," shall become indebted in an amount exceeding, in any year, the income and revenue provided for that year, without the consent of two-thirds of the voters; and that in such case no indebtedness shall be incurred to an amount, including existing indebtedness, exceeding 5 per cent. on the value of the taxable property therein. Held, in view of the legislative power to create municipalities, and in the absence of any positive constitutional limitation, that the law was valid and effective to create a new political or municipal corporation.
5. HIGHWAYS (§ 122)—DISTRICTS—TAXATION —LIMITATION OF RATES—CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS.
The taxing power of a special road district created under Rev. St. 1909, §§ 10,576-10,610, and section 10,577, Laws 1911, p. 370, so as to authorize the levy and collection of taxes and the issuance of bonds, not exceeding 5 per cent. of the authorized valuation of such district, and the levy and collection of a direct annual tax upon all the taxable property in the district, sufficient to pay the principal and interest of the bonds authorized, is not limited by Const. art. 10, § 11, as amended (Acts 1909, p. 906), since that provision is expressly limited to taxes for county, city, town, and school purposes.
6. HIGHWAYS (§ 122)—DISTRICTS—BONDS—PAYMENT OF INTEREST.
The power of a special road district created under Rev. St. 1909, §§ 10,576-10,610, and section 10,577, Laws 1911, p. 370, to use certain amounts to pay the principal and interest on its bonds is not affected by Const. art. 10, § 11, as amended in 1908 (Acts 1909, p. 906), since that amendment was designed only as an additional means by which the public roads of the county might be improved, and does not apply to a special road district, created as a new political or municipal corporation.
In Banc. Appeal from Circuit Court, Callaway County; David Harris, Judge.
Suit for injunction by O. T. Harris against the William R. Compton Bond & Mortgage Company and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
This suit was instituted in the circuit court of Callaway county by the plaintiff against the defendants, seeking to enjoin the board of commissioners of Fulton special road district of Callaway county from issuing $100,000 of its bonds, and the treasurer of the district from delivering them to the purchasers, and the purchasers thereof from accepting them, etc.
The petition was filed March 30, 1912, and was demurred to. The demurrer was by the court sustained, and the plaintiff duly excepted and declined to plead further, the court rendered judgment in favor of the defendants, and the plaintiff duly appealed the cause to this court, and, because the matters involved affect the public, the case was advanced. The petition stated fully all the facts of the case, and the demurrer admits their truthfulness. In order that the merits of the case may fully appear, we will set out the petition and the demurrer thereto. The petition is in words and figures as follows (formal parts omitted):
General Assembly of the state of Missouri entitled `An act authorizing special road districts to issue bonds and providing for the payment thereof with an emergency clause,' approved March 18, 1911. That on the said 28th day of March, 1912, the board of commissioners, by resolution duly adopted, ordered the levy of a direct annual tax upon all taxable property within said special road district sufficient to produce the following sums in the following years, respectively:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ludlow-Saylor Wire Co. v. Wollbrinck
...Oak Creek, 247 U. S. 321, 38 Sup. Ct. 499, 62 L. Ed. 1135; Pitman v. Drabelle, 267 Mo. loc. cit. 84, 183 S. W. 1055; Harris v. Bond Co., 244 Mo. loc. cit. 687, 149 S. W. 603; McGrew v. Paving Co., 247 Mo. loc. cit. 570, 155 S. W. 411; Ex parte Roberts, 166 Mo. loc. cit. 212, 65 S. W. 726; S......
-
State ex rel. Gordon v. Becker
...S.W. 272; State ex rel. v. Burton, 266 Mo. 711, 717, 182 S.W. 146; Pitman v. Drabelle, 267 Mo. 78, 84, 183 S.W. 1055; Harris v. Bond Co., 244 Mo. 664, 687, 149 S.W. 603, and other cases too numerous for present mention. As far as we have been able to ascertain the foregoing distinction has ......
-
Spitcaufsky v. Hatten
...Sections 2 or 7 of Article XII or of Subsection 25 of Section 53 of Article IV of the Constitution of Missouri. Harris v. W.R. Compton Bond & Mtge. Co., 244 Mo. 664, 149 S.W. 603; Honey Creek Drainage Dist. v. Farm City Inv. Co., 326 Mo. 739, 32 S.W. (2d) 739; State ex rel. Jones v. Brown, ......
- Harris v. William R. Compton Bond & Mortgage Co.