Harrison v. Bartlett

Decision Date31 October 1872
Citation51 Mo. 170
PartiesHARDY V. HARRISON, Respondent, v. GEORGE T. BARTLETT, Appellant.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from Butler Circuit Court.

E. McGinnis, for Appellant.

T. T. Gantt, for Respondent.

WAGNER, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court.

This case was tried before the court sitting as a jury, and afte hearing the evidence the verdict was for the plaintiff, and judgment was rendered thereon. From that judgment the defendant has appealed.

We have examined the whole record and find that no exceptions were saved to the rulings of the court, and no in structions were asked for or given. There is, therefore, n point of law preserved for this court to review.

At the end of the bill of exceptions we find it stated that to all the rulings, orders and judgment of the court the defendant excepted. But this court has always held that that was not sufficient and would not be noticed.

The exception must be saved to the specific ruling in the progress of the cause. When a question of law is sought to be raised on the trial, instructions should always be asked for so as to enable this court to see on what theory the court below decided.

As there is no question of law before us, the judgment must be affirmed.

Judge Adams concurs, Judge Bliss absent.

To continue reading

Request your trial
73 cases
  • Yost v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • July 5, 1912
    ... ... McKee v. D. G. Co., 152 Mo.App. 241; St. Joseph ... v. Ensworth, 65 Mo. 628; Harrison v. Bartlett, ... 51 Mo. 170; Parsons v. Clark, 98 Mo.App. 28. (2) The ... defendant was guilty of gross negligence in constructing the ... ...
  • Meyers v. Drake
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 3, 1930
    ... ... managing his estate. Maddox v. Maddox, 114 Mo. 631; ... Crossan v. Crossan, 169 Mo. 631; Roberts v ... Bartlett, 190 Mo. 680; Knapp v. Trust Co., 199 ... Mo. 663; Crowson v. Crowson, 172 Mo. 702. (b) The ... appellants criticize the use of the language, ... course of the trial, "the exception must be saved to the ... specific ruling in the progress of the cause." [Harrison ... v. Bartlett, 51 Mo. 170.] ...           [324 ... Mo. 630] But, aside from the failure of the appellants to ... take and save an ... ...
  • Haniford v. Kansas City
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 2, 1891
    ... ... Flori v. St. Louis, 3 Mo.App. 231; Hamber v ... Brasher, 51 Mo. 439; Porter v. Harrison, 52 Mo ... 524; State v. Holmes, 54 Mo. 153; Myers v ... Railroad, 59 Mo. 223; McKeon v. Railroad, 43 ... Mo. 405; Marshall v. Ins. Co., 43 Mo ... error. Tower v. Moore, 52 Mo. 118; Lohart v ... Buchanan, 50 Mo. 201; Harrison v. Bartlett, 51 ... Mo. 170; Margrave v. Ausmuss, 51 Mo. 561; Waller ... v. Railroad, 83 Mo. 608; McIlvine v. Thompson, ... 81 Mo. 647; State v. Williams, 77 ... ...
  • Kane v. Missouri Pacific Railway Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 2, 1913
    ...Frank P. Walsh and E. R. Morrison for defendant in error. (1) There is nothing for consideration here but the record proper. Harrison v. Bartlett, 51 Mo. 170; Joseph v. Ensworth, 65 Mo. 628; Railroad v. Cauley, 148 Ill. 490; Mfg. Co. v. Lambertson, 74 Kan. 304; Walter v. Walter, 117 Ind. 24......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT