Harrison v. Commonwealth

Citation79 Va. 374
Case DateSeptember 18, 1884
CourtSupreme Court of Virginia

79 Va. 374

HARRISON
v.
THE COMMONWEALTH.

Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia.

September 18, 1884


Argued at Wytheville but decided at Staunton. Error to judgment of circuit court of Wythe county, refusing a writ of error to judgment of county court of said county, rendered January 21st, 1884, by which judgment the plaintiff in error was, in accordance with the verdict of the jury, at his trial on an indictment for the murder of Craig Brown, sentenced to death by hanging.

The facts of the case as certified are as follows:

The prisoner and the deceased were in the employment of Van Lew's iron furnace, in Wythe county, the prisoner as a teamster and the deceased as a gutterer; but they lived in different houses, which, however, were in sight one from the other. On the night of November 22d, about 8 o'clock at night, the prisoner went to the house where the deceased lived; as he walked in deceased took hold of the prisoner as if to engage in a friendly tussle. Prisoner did not notice him at first, but as the deceased loosened his hold of the prisoner and started to walk into a back room, the prisoner set down a lantern which he held in his hand, and put his hands on the shoulders of the deceased from behind and pushed him into the rear room, where they scuffled a few minutes, which resulted in both parties falling on a bed in that room. The prisoner fell on top of deceased, and choked him in that position. Deceased, while they were on the bed, cut the prisoner with an instrument supposed to be a jack-knife. They were then separated. Although twice cut with the knife, the prisoner was not much hurt, and did not stop work, and no surgeon saw the wounds until after the homicide. On the 23d the prisoner tried to get an opportunity to renew the difficulty, and later in the day exhibited a pistol, which he said he had for the deceased. On the morning of the homicide, which was the 25th of November, the prisoner came out of his quarters, pistol in hand, and seeing deceased chopping wood close by, went up to him, saying to a companion, " yonder is that fellow now; I will go and settle with him." Then the prisoner came up within eight or ten feet of the deceased, who was still chopping wood, and presented his pistol at him. The deceased called for a man in the house, named McClellan, to come to the door, that the prisoner was there bothering him again, and that he was not bothering the prisoner. The prisoner then said: " What did you cut me with that knife for?" Deceased replied: " Shoot me; if you don't, I will kill you." The prisoner replied: " No; I don't want to shoot you, but if you will put down your axe and come out here, I will fight you a fair fight." Deceased said angrily, with an oath: " No; I am done with the fuss, but when you shoot, make a sure shoot, or I will kill you certain." The prisoner, during this colloquy, lowered his pistol with the muzzle downward, and taking hold of the hammer or cylinder with one hand, seemed to be working or fingering the hammer or barrels. He held the pistol in this position for several minutes, and upon the deceased speaking the words: " When you shoot, make a sure shot, or I will kill you certain," the prisoner stepped back a step or two, raised and presented the pistol at the deceased and fired two shots in quick succession, both of which took effect in the body of the deceased, from the effects of which he quickly died.

The deceased had made no motion or threat of striking with the axe which he held in his hand, and was not near enough to have struck the prisoner with the axe, in the place he was standing, without throwing it, which he showed no sign of doing.

It was further proved, that on the day after the difficulty, when the cutting was done, the deceased had been urged to leave the place until the prisoner got quiet, when he said he would not do it; that he had tried to cut the prisoner's guts out once, and that he was going to lay around until he got hold of him, and then he was going...

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 practice notes
  • Burford v. Commonwealth
    • United States
    • Virginia Supreme Court of Virginia
    • June 8, 1942
    ...the introduction of the offered testimony." State v. Jennings, 96 Mont. 80, 28 P.2d 448, 451, 121 A.L.R. 375. In Harrison v. Commonwealth, 79 Va. 374, 379, 52 Am. Rep. 634, this is said: "And where no case of self-defence has been made out, it has been decided, in numerous cases, that such ......
  • Kirby v. Com., Record No. 0829-06-3.
    • United States
    • Virginia Court of Appeals of Virginia
    • December 11, 2007
    ...47 Va.App. 168, 171 n. 3, 622 S.E.2d 771, 773 n. 3 (2005) (en banc) (citation omitted). 3. See generally Harrison v. Commonwealth, 79 Va. 374, 378-79 (1884) (rejecting claim that decedent's character of being "fussy and quarrelsome would justify any person to kill him who should so feel 4. ......
  • Burford v. Commonwealth, Record No. 2540.
    • United States
    • Virginia Supreme Court of Virginia
    • June 8, 1942
    ...laid for the introduction of the offered testimony." State Jennings, 96 Mont. 80, 28 P.(2d) 448, 121 A.L.R. 375. In Harrison Commonwealth, 79 Va. 374, 379, 52 Am.Rep. 634, this is said: "And where no case of self-defence has been made out, it has been decided, in numerous cases, that such e......
  • Long v. State
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Arkansas
    • May 28, 1904
    ...is not presumed when the slayer and deceased reside in different and distant communities. Horbach v. State, 43 Tex. 242; Harrison v. Com. 79 Va. 374; s. c. 52 Am. Rep. 634; Trabune v. Com. (Ky.), 13 Ky. L. Rep. 343, 17 S.W. 186; Underhill on Criminal Evidence, § 324, and cases cited; 5 Am. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
14 cases
  • Burford v. Commonwealth
    • United States
    • Virginia Supreme Court of Virginia
    • June 8, 1942
    ...the introduction of the offered testimony." State v. Jennings, 96 Mont. 80, 28 P.2d 448, 451, 121 A.L.R. 375. In Harrison v. Commonwealth, 79 Va. 374, 379, 52 Am. Rep. 634, this is said: "And where no case of self-defence has been made out, it has been decided, in numerous cases, that such ......
  • Kirby v. Com., Record No. 0829-06-3.
    • United States
    • Virginia Court of Appeals of Virginia
    • December 11, 2007
    ...47 Va.App. 168, 171 n. 3, 622 S.E.2d 771, 773 n. 3 (2005) (en banc) (citation omitted). 3. See generally Harrison v. Commonwealth, 79 Va. 374, 378-79 (1884) (rejecting claim that decedent's character of being "fussy and quarrelsome would justify any person to kill him who should so feel 4. ......
  • Burford v. Commonwealth, Record No. 2540.
    • United States
    • Virginia Supreme Court of Virginia
    • June 8, 1942
    ...laid for the introduction of the offered testimony." State Jennings, 96 Mont. 80, 28 P.(2d) 448, 121 A.L.R. 375. In Harrison Commonwealth, 79 Va. 374, 379, 52 Am.Rep. 634, this is said: "And where no case of self-defence has been made out, it has been decided, in numerous cases, that such e......
  • Long v. State
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Arkansas
    • May 28, 1904
    ...is not presumed when the slayer and deceased reside in different and distant communities. Horbach v. State, 43 Tex. 242; Harrison v. Com. 79 Va. 374; s. c. 52 Am. Rep. 634; Trabune v. Com. (Ky.), 13 Ky. L. Rep. 343, 17 S.W. 186; Underhill on Criminal Evidence, § 324, and cases cited; 5 Am. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT