Hart-Zafra v. Singh

Decision Date03 March 2005
Docket Number5507.
Citation16 A.D.3d 143,790 N.Y.S.2d 129,2005 NY Slip Op 01635
PartiesCHRISTOPHER HART-ZAFRA, Appellant, v. "TONY" SINGH et al., Respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

The circumstance that plaintiff owner, during the period in question, permitted defendants to reside in the subject basement apartment without obtaining a proper certificate of occupancy for the unit precludes his recovery of use and occupancy (see Jalinos v Ramkalup, 255 AD2d 293 [1998]). This is not a situation in which the owner was prevented by the occupants from bringing the unit into compliance (cf. First Edition Composite v Wilkson, 177 AD2d 297 [1991]).

Concur — Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Marlow and Nardelli, JJ.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Trafalgar Co. v. Malone
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • November 26, 2021
    ...of GVS Props. LLC v Vargas, 172 A.D.3d 466 [2019]; Matter of 49 Bleecker, Inc. v Gatien, 157 A.D.3d 619 [2018]; Hart-Zafra v Singh, 16 A.D.3d 143 [2005]). Thus, the use and occupancy deposited into court by tenant pursuant to RPAPL 745(2), as per Civil Court's January 2018 orders, was prope......
  • Trafalgar Co. v. Malone
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • November 26, 2021
    ...Matter of GVS Props. LLC v Vargas, 172 A.D.3d 466 [2019]; Matter of 49 Bleecker, Inc. v Gatien, 157 A.D.3d 619 [2018]; Hart-Zafra v Singh, 16 A.D.3d 143 [2005]). Thus, use and occupancy deposited into court by tenant pursuant to RPAPL 745(2), as per Civil Court's January 2018 orders, was pr......
  • Mushlam, Inc. v. Nazor
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • January 13, 2011
    ...allegations of residential use, with the landlord's knowledge, in violation of the certificate of occupancy ( see Hart-Zafra v. Singh, 16 A.D.3d 143, 790 N.Y.S.2d 129 [2005] ). Thus, we find that the record contains insufficient evidence of fair market value. The disparity between the amoun......
  • Soskin v. Camillerj
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • January 12, 2011
    ...shown the legality of the subject unit as a matter of law, it has not shown entitlement to use and occupancy (see Hart-Zafra v. Singh, 16 A.D.3d 143 [1st Dept. 2005]). With respect to the issue of the proper rent for the subject unit, the court finds that the unit is rent stabilized, since ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT