Hartford Acc. and Indem. Co. v. Millis Roofing and Sheet Metal, Inc.

CourtAppeals Court of Massachusetts
Citation418 N.E.2d 645,11 Mass.App.Ct. 998
PartiesHARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY v. MILLIS ROOFING AND SHEET METAL, INC. et al.
Decision Date07 April 1981

Stephen R. Kravetz, Foxboro, for defendants.

Peter G. Hermes, Boston (Deborah S. Griffin, Boston, with him), for plaintiff.

Before GRANT, BROWN and KASS, JJ.

RESCRIPT.

The plaintiff Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (the bonding company) paid $79,000 in settlement of a claim arising from the failure of a roof which Millis Roofing and Sheet Metal, Inc. (Millis), had installed. The bonding company had executed, as a surety, a subcontractor's performance bond on the work in question. Exercising rights under a general indemnity agreement, the bonding company brought an action for the amount of the settlement against Millis and its president, Martin Doliner, who was a co-indemnitor on the indemnity agreement. A motion for summary judgment by the bonding company was allowed and judgment for $79,000, plus interest, was entered against Millis and Doliner, jointly and severally. Under Article V of the indemnity agreement, Millis and Doliner agreed to indemnify the bonding company "against any and all liability ... by reason of having executed any Bond ...." Article VII of the agreements authorized the bonding company to " adjust, settle or compromise any claim, demand, suit or judgment upon any of the Bonds, unless the Indemnitors (1) shall request the Surety to litigate such claim or demand, or to defend such suit ... and (2) shall deposit with the Surety, at the time of such request, cash or collateral ... to be used in paying any judgment rendered ...." Article VI provided that the liability of the indemnitors "shall extend to and include the amount of all payments ... made by the Surety in good faith under the belief that (1) the Surety was or might be liable therefor .... The vouchers or other evidence of such payments sworn to by an officer of the Surety shall be prima facie evidence of the fact and extent of the liability of the Indemnitors to the Surety."

In view of the provisions of the indemnity agreement, the attempt by the defendants to attack the summary judgment on the ground that blame for the roof failure lay elsewhere is misdirected. To the extent that may be an issue of fact, it is not material as it was only necessary that the bonding company have acted in good faith when it settled the claim against Millis. See General Ins. Co. v. Singleton, 40 Cal.App.3d 439, 444, 115 Cal.Rptr. 291 (1974); Ford v. Aetna Ins. Co., 394 S.W.2d 693, 698 (Tex.Civ.App.1965). The broad language of the indemnity agreement reflects an intention to provide comprehensive reimbursement to the bonding company of money expended by it in connection with claims against Millis. Peerless Cas. Co. v. Marinucci Bros. & Co., 336 Mass. 691, 695, 147 N.E.2d 751 (1958). As to the issue of its good faith, the bonding company filed affidavits, interrogatories answered by the general contractor on the job in question, technical reports received by it, and a deposition of Doliner. Nothing offered by the defendants contradicts the bonding company's materials to the effect that it had received evidence tending to prove that Millis' work on the roof had been deficient and that a substance used had (by Millis' own admission) not performed properly. Those materials included a sworn statement by the assistant secretary...

To continue reading

Request your trial
38 cases
  • Schwanbeck v. Federal-Mogul Corp.
    • United States
    • Appeals Court of Massachusetts
    • October 29, 1991
    ...Participations, Inc., 297 Mass. 398, 416-417, 8 N.E.2d 895 (1937); Hartford Acc. & Indemn. Co. v. Millis Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc., 11 Mass.App.Ct. 998, 999-1000, 418 N.E.2d 645 (1981). Bad faith was certainly not implicated in F-M's dealing with another buyer. That right was reserved wit......
  • Judge Rotenberg Educational Center, Inc. v. Commissioner of the Dept. of Mental Retardation, 1
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • March 13, 1997
    ...or breach of duty through motive of self-interest or ill will." Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. Millis Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc., 11 Mass.App.Ct. 998, 999-1000, 418 N.E.2d 645 (1981), citing Spiegel v. Beacon Participations, Inc., 297 Mass. 398, 416-417, 8 N.E.2d 895 (1937). Indeed, if the ......
  • Lawson v. Affirmative Equities Co., L.P., CIV.A.02-12172-RGS.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. District of Massachusetts
    • October 27, 2004
    ...or breach of a duty through motive of self-interest or ill will." Hartford Acc. & Indemnity Co. v. Millis Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc., 11 Mass.App.Ct. 998, 999-1000, 418 N.E.2d 645 (1981); Schwanbeck v. Federal-Mogul Corp., 31 Mass.App.Ct. 390, 404, 578 N.E.2d 789 (1991) (same), rev'd on ot......
  • Sax v. DiPrete, Civil Action No. 08-11662-RGS.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. District of Massachusetts
    • August 6, 2009
    ...or breach of a duty through motive of self-interest or ill will." Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. Millis Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc., 11 Mass.App.Ct. 998, 999-1000, 418 N.E.2d 645 (1981); Schwanbeck v. Fed.-Mogul Corp., 31 Mass. App.Ct. 390, 404, 578 N.E.2d 789 (1991) (same), rev'd on other g......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Annual survey of fidelity and surety law, 1993.
    • United States
    • Defense Counsel Journal Vol. 61 No. 3, July 1994
    • July 1, 1994
    ...1384 (La.App. 1993). (37.)827 F.Supp. 385 (E.D.La. 1993). (38.)431 S.E.2d 302 (Va. 1993). (39.)622 N.E.2d 283 (Mass.App. 1993). (40.)418 N.E.2d 645 (Mass.App. (41.)621 So.2d 1227 (Ala. 1993). (42.)856 P.2d 240 (Nev. 1993). (43.)2 F.3d 670 (6th Cir. 1993). (44.)371 U.S. 132 (1962). (45.)602 ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT