Hartford Accident & Indem. Co v. Carroll
Decision Date | 18 June 1947 |
Docket Number | No. 31585.,31585. |
Citation | 43 S.E.2d 722 |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Parties | HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY CO. et al. v. CARROLL. |
Rehearing Denied July 16, 1947.
Syllabus by the Court.
1. Where the parties agree upon compensation to be paid an injured employee, and the State Board of Workmen's Compensation approves the agreement, the board has authority, within the time prescribed by law, to hear and determine an applica-don by the employee for additional compensation on the ground of a change in condition notwithstanding an earlier award finding that an aggravation of a pre-existing osteo-arthritis by the injury had ceased, such an award merely adjudicated the claimant's condition at the time of that hearing and was not res judicata as to the condition at the later hearing.
2. There was no evidence which would authorize the single director in finding that there had been a change in the claimant's condition as a result of the original injury.
Error from Superior Court, Cobb County; J. H. Hawkins, Judge.
Proceeding under the Workmen's Compensation Act by M. M. Carroll, claimant, opposed by Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co, insurer, and claimant's employer. To review a judgment of Superior Court affirming an award of the full board of the State Board of Workmen's Compensation which affirmed decision of single director that claimant was entitled to additional compensation on ground of a change in condition, the insurer and employer bring error.
Reversed.
M. M. Carroll was injured at the Bell Aircraft Corporation in Marietta, Georgia, May 13, 1944, when he was struck in the back by a motor scooter and knocked down. The insurance carrier, Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, the employer, and the claimant entered into an agreement for the payment of compensation to the claimant on May 31, 1944, which agreement was approved by the State Workmen's Compensation Board. The agreement stipulated that compensation should be paid at the rate of $20 per week based on an average weekly wage of $47.32, until terminated in accordance with the provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Law of the State of Georgia. On April 24, 1945, after a hearing had at the instance of the insurance carrier, a single director made the following material findings of fact: On appeal this finding of the single director was affirmed by the full board, the Superior Court of Cobb County, and by this court, Carroll v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co, 73 Ga.App. 799, 38 S.E.2d 185.
While the appeal was pending in this court, the claimant, on December 19, 1945, filed an application with the State Board of Workmen's Compensation for review on the ground of a change in condition. After a hearing was had, another single director found that there had been a change in condition. On appeal to the full board this finding was affirmed, with the original hearing director dissenting. The Superior Court of Cobb County affirmed the award, and the employer and insurer appealed to this court on the ground that the first award was conclusive on the claimant and res adjudicata that the aggravation to his osteo-arthritis caused by the accident and injury had ceased and that his disability resulted solely from his osteo-arthritis and not from the injury, and that there was not sufficient evidence to authorize the finding on the last hearing that there had been a change in condition.
The evidence adduced at the two hearings which is material to a determination of the case is as follows: On the first hearing the report of Dr. Rufus A. Askew, was admitted in evidence by agreement. Dr. Askew reported:
Dr. Askew testified at the hearing:
Dr. M. B. Copeloff testified in behalf of the claimant; on cross-examination the following answers were given by him:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
J. A. Jones Const. Co. v. Martin
...400. See also, Allen v. Mottley Construction Co., 160 Va. 875, 880, 170 S.E. 412. As was aptly said in Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Carroll, 75 Ga. App. 437, 43 S.E.2d 722, 728, "A change in condition means a different condition from that existent when the award was made; and a cont......
-
Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. Carroll
...43 S.E.2d 722 75 Ga.App. 437 HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY CO. et al. v. CARROLL. No. 31585.Court of Appeals of Georgia, Division No. 1.June 18, 1947 ... Rehearing ... Denied July 16, 1947 ... ... Syllabus by the Court ... 1 ... Where the parties agree upon compensation to be ... ...
-
Aetna Ins. Co. v. Gipson, 38862
...the matters thus agreed upon. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. Cook, 195 Ga. 397, 399, 24 S.E.2d 309; Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. v. Carroll, 75 Ga.App. 437, 444, 43 S.E.2d 722. Under this principle as applied to the evidence in this case, it is our opinion that the compensation agreem......
-
Lots v. Kiker
...condition as a result of the injury “was last established by award or otherwise.” OCGA § 34-9-104(a); Hartford Accident, etc. Co. v. Carroll, 75 Ga.App. 437, 443-445, 43 S.E.2d 722 (1947). We find that the December 2005 consent order changing treating physicians did not establish by award o......