Hartney v. Hartney
| Decision Date | 22 September 2004 |
| Citation | 271 Conn. 920,859 A.2d 578 |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
| Parties | Frances S. HARTNEY v. Robert J. HARTNEY. |
James Colin Mulholland, Salem, in support of the petition.
Edith F. McClure, West Hartford, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 83 Conn.App. 553, 850 A.2d 1098 (2004), is denied.
BORDEN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
To continue reading
Request your trial
13 cases
-
Putman v. Kennedy, No. 17392.
...We agree with the Appellate Court's conclusion in Hartney v. Hartney, 83 Conn.App. 553, 565 n. 6, 850 A.2d 1098, cert. denied, 271 Conn. 920, 859 A.2d 578 (2004), that a § 46b-15 domestic violence restraining order is an appealable final judgment. Because of the potentially irreparable effe......
-
Oliphant v. Comm'r of Corr.
...it. The claim, therefore, must be dismissed. See Hartney v. Hartney, 83 Conn.App. 553, 565–66, 850 A.2d 1098, cert. denied, 271 Conn. 920, 859 A.2d 578 (2004). 29. Moreover, at the show cause hearing, the respondent placed a transcript of the violation of probation hearing into evidence. Th......
-
Rogers v. Rogers
...21, 2016. General Statutes § 46b-86(a); see also Hartney v. Hartney, 83 Conn.App. 553, 559, 850 A.2d 1098, cert. denied, 271 Conn. 920, 859 A.2d 578 (2004). Although the court may consider such factors as the length time between the date of filing and the date of deciding a motion to modify......
-
Rubenstein v. Rubenstein
...in each case the guidelines of the General Statutes." Hartney v. Hartney, 83 Conn.App. 553, 559, 850 A.2d 1098, cert. denied, 271 Conn. 920, 859 A.2d 578 (2004). General Statutes § 46b-824 describes factors a court should consider in its decisions regarding alimony. "The court must consider......
Request a trial to view additional results