Hartsell v. Hartsell, No. 405A90

Decision Date02 May 1991
Docket NumberNo. 405A90
Citation403 S.E.2d 307,328 N.C. 729
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesBillie M. HARTSELL v. Gene W. HARTSELL.

Appeal by defendant pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 99 N.C.App. 380, 393 S.E.2d 570 (1990), affirming the order of Johnston (Robert P.), J., at the 13 December 1988 Session of District Court, Mecklenburg County. Heard in the Supreme Court 9 April 1991.

James, McElroy and Diehl, P.A. by William K. Diehl, Jr. and Barbara J. Hellenschmidt, for plaintiff-appellee.

Douglas E. Brafford, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

To continue reading

Request your trial
31 cases
  • Robinson v. Robinson
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • March 15, 2011
    ...in actions for equitable distribution. E.g., Hartsell v. Hartsell, 99 N.C.App. 380, 390, 393 S.E.2d 570, 576 (1990), aff'd, 328 N.C. 729, 403 S.E.2d 307 (1991); Holder, 87 N.C.App. at 583–84, 361 S.E.2d at 894–95; Patterson v. Patterson, 81 N.C.App. 255, 262, 343 S.E.2d 595, 600 (1986). Bec......
  • Moss Creek Homeowners Ass'n v. Bissette
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • February 2, 2010
    ...380, 393 S.E.2d 570 (1990) (awarding attorneys' fees in a contempt action to enforce equitable distribution award), aff'd, 328 N.C. 729, 403 S.E.2d 307 (1991). Appellees' current action did not arise in either of these contexts; and the cases cited by appellees7 in defense of the fee award ......
  • Moss Creek Homeowners Ass'n v. Bissette
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • October 20, 2009
    ...380, 393 S.E.2d 570 (1990) (awarding attorneys' fees in a contempt action to enforce equitable distribution award), aff'd, 328 N.C. 729, 403 S.E.2d 307 (1991). Appellees' current action did not arise in either of these contexts; and the cases cited by appellees7 in defense of the fee award ......
  • Lesh v. Lesh
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • January 16, 2018
    ...defendant in civil contempt where evidence supported findings that his noncompliance with court order was willful), aff'd per curiam , 328 N.C. 729, 403 S.E.2d 307 (1991).ConclusionFor the reasons stated above, we affirm the trial court's 27 January 2017 order.AFFIRMED.Judges BRYANT and INM......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT