Harvey v. Elder
Decision Date | 21 November 1945 |
Docket Number | No. 11563.,11563. |
Citation | 191 S.W.2d 686 |
Parties | HARVEY v. ELDER. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Gonzales County; Lester Holt, Judge.
Action by Mrs. Hattie B. Harvey against Dr. N. A. Elder for malpractice. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed.
G. Woodson Morris and E. B. Simmons, both of San Antonio, for appellant.
Willis W. Ellison and Miller & Miller, all of Gonzales, for appellee.
This is a malpractice case. Judgment below was for the defendant, Dr. N. A. Elder. Mrs. Hattie B. Harvey, the appellant, asserts here that the trial court erred in giving a peremptory instruction to the jury, for the reason that the motion therefor did not comply with the provisions of Rule 268, Texas R.C.P., which requires that, "A motion for directed verdict shall state the specific grounds therefor."
The motion filed in this case did not meet the requirements of the rule, and had the judge overruled the same, a point of error in an appellate court could not be predicated upon such action. Atlantic Greyhound Corporation v. McDonald, 4 Cir., 125 F.2d 849; Wright v. Carey, Tex.Civ.App., 169 S.W.2d 749; Patrick v. McGaha, Tex. Civ.App., 164 S.W.2d 236.
However, it does not follow that the granting of a motion that does not comply with Rule 268 and the rendition of a judgment based thereon constitutes reversible error. When questions of law only are involved, a trial court may at the conclusion of the hearing of the evidence take the case from the jury and proceed to render judgment. This may be done on the court's own motion and this power is in no way dependent upon a motion having been filed by a party litigant. Rudco Oil and Gas Co. v. Gulf Oil Corporation, Tex.Civ.App., 169 S.W.2d 791. We see no difference between the situation where the court on its own motion renders a judgment and one where the court upon an irregular or insufficient motion by one of the parties directs a verdict and renders judgment accordingly. In either instance, in determining the matter of reversible error, the question is the same, i. e., Was the prevailing party below entitled to judgment as a matter of law?
With regard to this question, the disposition of this appeal depends upon whether or not the evidence viewed in the light most favorable to appellant affords a factual basis for the cancellation of a written instrument which purports to be a compromise and settlement of all claims which Mrs. Harvey had against Dr. Elder.
Dr. Elder performed surgical operations upon Mrs. Harvey on May 12, 1940, July 28, 1942, and September 28, 1942. On March 14, 1943, appellant underwent a further surgical operation at the Robert B. Green Hospital in San Antonio, Texas.
The hospital report of this last operation contained the following statement:
Mrs. Harvey secured a copy of this report, went to Nixon, Texas, where Dr. Elder resided, and showed him the report. On November 20, 1943, Mrs. Harvey executed the following release before a Notary Public of Gonzales, Texas, viz.:
Mrs. Harvey's version of events relating to the execution of this release, as stated in her brief filed in this Court, is as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Walter E. Heller & Co. v. Allen, 221
...own volition regardless of the sufficiency or not of a motion. In re Price's Estate, Tex.Sup.Ct., 675 S.W.2d 900, 904; Harvey v. Elder, Tex.Civ.App., 191 S.W.2d 686, writ ref.; Rockett v. Texas State Board of Medical Examiners, Tex.Civ.App., 287 S.W.2d 190, writ ref., n.r.e.; Anderson Furni......
-
Carrillo v. Roicom USA, LLC
...not equate to a "trick or artifice" that prevents a party from reading or understanding a contract. See, e.g., Harvey v. Elder , 191 S.W.2d 686, 689 (Tex. Civ. App. 1945) (holding that a doctor's oral representation that a document was a receipt and his failure to disclose that it contained......
-
Schrock v. City of Baytown
...court's directed verdict on Schrock's declaratory-judgment claim as a sua sponte directed verdict. See Harvey v. Elder , 191 S.W.2d 686, 687 (Tex. Civ. App.—San Antonio 1945, writ ref'd) ; Allen v. State Farm Lloyds , No. 05-16-00108-CV, 2017 WL 3275912, at *14 (Tex. App.—Dallas Aug. 1, 201......
-
Deutsch v. Hoover, Bax & Slovacek, L.L.P.
...directed verdict to specify a ground "is not always fatal, especially if there are no fact issues raised by the evidence"); Harvey v. Elder, 191 S.W.2d 686, 687 (Tex. Civ. App.CSan Antonio 1945, writ ref'd) (holding by the Texas Supreme Court that trial court can grant sua sponte directed v......