Hatchett v. Going
| Decision Date | 01 June 1926 |
| Docket Number | 16460. |
| Citation | 246 P. 1100,121 Okla. 25,1926 OK 520 |
| Parties | HATCHETT v. GOING, County Treasurer. |
| Court | Oklahoma Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court.
A resale tax deed containing the recitals that the county treasurer of Payne county, Okl., sold the described tract parcel, or lot theretofore to said county, and the same had remained unredeemed for a period of more than two years from the date of said sale, and no person offered to purchase the same by paying the treasurer the amount of taxes, penalties interest, and costs of sale and transfer; that notice of resale thereof had been duly given by publication of a notice of sale in the Stillwater Gazette, a newspaper of general circulation, published in said county, by publishing a notice once each consecutive week for four publications preceding the resale, describing the real estate to be sold, the name of the owner of said real estate as shown by the last tax rolls in the office of the county treasurer, the time and place of sale, the date on which said real estate was sold to the county for delinquent taxes, the years that taxes had been assessed and after delinquency added to the county lien that the same had not been redeemed for a period of more than two years from the date of sale to the county; the amount of all delinquent taxes, costs, penalties, and interest accrued thereon; that such real estate would be sold to the highest bidder for cash for said taxes, costs, penalties, and interest accrued thereon and remaining due, delinquent, and unpaid, and that on the 21st day of April, 1924, at a sale to be begun on the third Monday of April, 1924, between the hours of 9 o'clock a. m. and 4 o'clock p. m., and continued from day to day between the same hours until completed, W. E. Going, the county treasurer of said county pursuant to said advertisement, did offer separately for sale at public auction, for cash, at the office of the county treasurer in the courthouse in and for said county of Payne, and did then and there sell separately the following described property for the amount set opposite thereto: (Description, purchaser, price, each lots separately)-the purchaser being the highest and best bidder therefor, the said sum being the highest amount bid therefor, and the same being equal to or greater than the amount of taxes, penalties, interest, and costs due on such tracts of land above described; that the owner of said property so sold at said resale had not offered to redeem the same by paying to the county treasurer the amount of all taxes, penalties, interest, and costs of sale up to the date of such redemption; that the said property remained unredeemed (then follows the usual granting and habendum clauses of such deed); that all delinquent taxes, penalties, interest, and costs previously assessed or existing against the said real estate, including ad valorem and outstanding individual county tax sale certificates, were expressly set aside and canceled, duly signed by the county treasurer as such official, and attested and acknowledged in due form by him before the county clerk of said county, is not void upon its face, in view of sections 9750 and 9752, Compiled Oklahoma Statutes 1921, and chapter 158, Session Laws 1923.
Appeal from District Court, Payne County; C. C. Smith, Judge.
Proceeding by A. P. Hatchett for mandamus to be directed to W. E. Going, County Treasurer of Payne County. From a judgment setting aside an alternative writ and denying a peremptory writ, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
Walter Mathews, of Pawhuska, for plaintiff in error.
C. C. Suman, Co. Atty., of Stillwater, for defendant in error.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Payne county, wherein A. P. Hatchett, plaintiff in error, as relator in the court below, sought and secured an alternative writ of mandamus against defendant in error, W. E. Going, as county treasurer of Payne county, respondent below. The alternative writ directed Going as such officer to show cause why a valid tax deed should not be executed by him conveying to the relator certain property of which relator had been the purchaser at a resale for the nonpayment of taxes. W. E. Going, respondent, made return to the alternative writ, showing an offer to execute a resale tax deed as prescribed on a form submitted by the state examiner and inspector as provided by section 6, c. 158, Session Laws 1923, and contended that such a resale tax deed was sufficient. On hearing, the alternative writ was set aside and the peremptory writ denied. The issue presented on appeal is whether or not the tax deed offered and tendered the relator by respondent is void on its face.
From an examination of this deed we find the following recitals: That the county treasurer of Payne county, Okl., sold the described tract, parcel, or lot theretofore to said county and the same had remained unredeemed for a period of more than two years from the date of said sale, and no person offered to purchase the same by paying the treasurer the amount of taxes, penalties, interest, and costs of sale and transfer; that notice of resale thereof had...
To continue reading
Request your trial