Hatton v. State
Decision Date | 16 December 1993 |
Docket Number | No. 49S02-9312-CR-1388,49S02-9312-CR-1388 |
Citation | 626 N.E.2d 442 |
Parties | Fredrick HATTON, Appellant (Defendant Below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff Below). |
Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
Brad C. Angleton, R. Victor Stivers, R. Victor Stivers & Associates Indianapolis, for appellant.
Pamela Carter, Atty. Gen., Arthur Thaddeus Perry, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, for appellee.
Appellant Fredrick Hatton appeals his convictions for murder, Ind.Code Ann. Sec. 35-42-1-1 (West Supp.1993), and robbery, a class A felony, Ind.Code Ann. Sec. 35-42-5-1 (West 1986). The trial court sentenced him to sixty years for murder and thirty years for robbery, penalties to be consecutive.
This case was originally docketed in this Court late in 1990. Counsel for Hatton sought a remand to the trial court in order to pursue a petition for post-conviction relief. We granted this request and terminated the appeal then pending pursuant to Davis v. State (1977), 267 Ind. 152, 368 N.E.2d 1149. After the trial court denied Hatton's post-conviction petition, Hatton initiated a new appeal, presenting both the issues which would have been addressed in the original appeal and those concerning the post-conviction proceeding. This was altogether appropriate under Davis. Counsel docketed this new appeal in the Court of Appeals, presumably because of the post-conviction claim. All post-conviction appeals in non-capital cases are now docketed in that court pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 4, which was not the case when Davis was written. In any event, the present appeal could have been docketed here, and we grant transfer to consider all the issues raised by Hatton.
The evidence favorable to the judgment reveals that Hatton's convictions arose out of events following his discharge from employment at a store called Stereo Concepts in Indianapolis. Equipment stolen from the store, including a Kenwood pull-out radio, was found in Hatton's car on November 9, 1988. Hatton was arrested and charged with theft. While he was in jail, Hatton spoke on the telephone several times with store owner Charles Miller, asking him to drop the charges. Miller declined, and Hatton was eventually tried and convicted. He was set for release on the morning of November 25, 1988. The evening of the 24th, Hatton called Miller to ask whether Stereo Concepts would be open on the 25th. Miller said it would be.
Hatton was released from the Marion County Jail about 5 a.m. on the morning of November 25. A few hours later, Miller found the manager of Stereo Concepts, Paul Guieb, lying dead in a pool of blood in the store's garage. Forensic testimony at trial showed that Guieb died from multiple .32 gauge gunshots to the head. He was shot once in the ear at a range of two feet. Both money and stereo equipment were missing, including Kenwood radios of the type which fit Hatton's car. Hatton's brother saw him on the afternoon of the murder and noticed he had a radio in his car again. Hatton declared he was "out and boomin' again."
Miller noticed Hatton standing outside Stereo Concepts while the police were there to investigate the murder. Hatton made various statements about his presence, including a contention that he learned about Guieb's death by going down to Stereo Concepts on the morning of the 25th and walking in an open door, at which point he saw Guieb. Asked by an acquaintance, Darryl Lewis, whether he killed Guieb, Hatton...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Woods v. State
...to pursue an immediate petition for postconviction relief. Davis v. State, 267 Ind. 152, 368 N.E.2d 1149 (1977); see also Hatton v. State, 626 N.E.2d 442 (Ind.1993) (reiterating vitality of Davis procedure). This should cover the exceptional case in which the defendant prefers to adjudicate......
-
Stephenson v. State
...other physical evidence connected Stephenson to the murders. The knife used in the murders was never recovered. Id. 7. See Hatton v. State, 626 N.E.2d 442 (Ind. 1993); Davis v. State, 267 Ind. 152, 368 N.E.2d 1149 8. Krantz, testified that Stephenson had been with her the night of the murde......
-
Brown v. Brown
...remedies have been exhausted." Id . at 1219–20. Under these rare circumstances, Woods explained, a procedure known in Indiana as the Davis- Hatton procedure allows a convicted appellant to suspend or terminate his direct appeal to pursue a petition for post-conviction relief. Id . at 1219, ......
-
Brown v. Superintendent
...this order. Counsel for the respondent is ORDERED to provide proof of compliance with this order within 75 days of this order. 1. The Davis– Hatton procedure involves a termination or suspension of a direct appeal already initiated, upon appellate counsel's motion for remand or stay, to all......