HAWAI'I NAT. BANK v. Cook
Decision Date | 16 May 2000 |
Docket Number | No. 22225.,22225. |
Parties | HAWAI`I NATIONAL BANK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brian R. COOK, also known as Brian Richard Cook, dba Windward Self-Storage, Pohukaina Venture; Kona Country Fair Venture, Defendant-Appellees, First Hawaiian Bank; Bank of Honolulu; Finance Factors, Limited; City and County of Honolulu; United States of America; Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, Receiver for State Savings and Loan Association; John Does 1-50; Jane Does 1-50; Doe Partnerships 1-50; Doe Corporations 1-50; Doe Entities 1-50 and Doe Governmental Units 1-50, Defendants, and Trustees Under the Will and of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop, Deceased, Intervenor-Appellee, and Atlantic National Trust Limited Liability Company, also known as Atlantic National Trust, L.L.C., Intervenors. Trustees Under the Will and of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hawai`i National Bank, Defendant-Appellant, and Pohukaina Venture, and Brian R. Cook, also known as Brian Richard Cook, Defendant-Appellees, and Atlantic National Trust, L.L.C., Ahuimanu Land Corp., United States of America, City and County of Honolulu, John Does 1-50, Jane Does 1-50, Doe Partnerships 1-50, Doe Corporations 1-50, Doe Entities 3-50, and Doe Governmental Units 1-50, Defendants. |
Court | Hawaii Court of Appeals |
Robert M. Ehrhorn, Jr. and Elizabeth A. Kane (Takushi Funaki Wong & Stone), on the briefs, Honolulu, for plaintiff-appellant.
Cheryl A. Nakamura and Earl T. Sato (Rush Moore Craven Sutton Morry & Beh), on the briefs, Honolulu, for intervenor-appellee.
Plaintiff-Appellant Hawaii National Bank (HNB) appeals the following actions of the first circuit court: (1) the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order denying HNB's motion for partial summary judgment and order granting judgment for Intervenor-Appellee Trustees Under the Will and of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop, Deceased (Bishop Estate), filed October 6, 1998; (2) the judgment thereon of even date; and (3) the deficiency judgment in favor of HNB and against Defendant-Appellee Brian R. Cook, also known as Brian Richard Cook, dba Windward Self-Storage (Cook), filed January 5, 1999.
We affirm.
The parties filing briefs in this appeal are Bishop Estate and HNB. Bishop Estate is the fee simple owner and was the lessor of two lots of commercial real property located in Kaka`ako, Hawaii (the Kaka`ako Properties). Bishop Estate leased each lot for a forty-year term.
Lease No. 11,249 (Lease 1) commenced on April 1, 1958 and by its terms was to terminate on March 31, 1998. Lease No. 11,251 (Lease 2) commenced on May 1, 1958 and by its terms was to terminate on April 30, 1998. Both Lease 1 and Lease 2 required payment of rent semiannually for the forty-year term.
Pohukaina Venture (Pohukaina) became the lessee of the Kaka`ako Properties pursuant to a March 14, 1978 assignment and thus owed rent to Bishop Estate under Leases 1 and 2 through March 31, 1998 and April 30, 1998, respectively.
At times hereinafter and indiscriminately, we will refer to the leases between Bishop Estate and Pohukaina as the "ground leases," and to the rent due Bishop Estate from Pohukaina under the ground leases as the "ground rent."
HNB was the holder of the following instruments which covered certain properties, including Pohukaina's leasehold interests in the Kaka`ako Properties: (1) a September 29, 1988 promissory note (Note A) in the amount of $1,100,000 and co-signed by Pohukaina, Cook and Kona Country Fair Venture (Kona Country); (2) a mortgage from Pohukaina to HNB securing Note A, which was executed and delivered on August 25, 1988 and recorded on September 28, 1988 (Mortgage A); (3) a July 12, 1989 promissory note (Note B) in the amount of $250,000 and co-signed by Pohukaina, Cook and Kona Country; and (4) a mortgage from Pohukaina to HNB securing Note B, which was executed, delivered and recorded on July 12, 1989 (Mortgage B).
HNB also held, by assignment, a promissory note, first mortgage and collateral assignment of leases from Pohukaina (Collateral Assignment), dated April 25, 1978 and recorded on January 27, 1998, previously held by Atlantic National Trust Limited Liability Company, also known as Atlantic National Trust, L.L.C. (Atlantic),1 which covered Pohukaina's leasehold interests in the Kaka`ako Properties.
This appeal focuses our attention squarely on the assignment-of-rents provisions found in Mortgage A, Mortgage B and the Collateral Assignment. Hereinafter, the provisions will collectively be referred to as HNB's Assignment of Rents.
Mortgages A and B, with Pohukaina as Mortgagor and HNB as Mortgagee, each provided, in pertinent part, that:
(Emphasis on the assignment of rents clauses added).
Mortgages A and B also each included a "consent and estoppel certificate" from Bishop Estate, providing:
That the [Bishop Estate], . . . [does] hereby consent to the execution of the within and foregoing Mortgage by [Pohukaina], as Mortgagor, in favor of [HNB], as Mortgagee, upon the express conditions, however, that this consent shall not authorize, nor be deemed to authorize, any further or other assignment or mortgage of said leases and that should there be any conflict between the terms of said leases and the terms of said Mortgage, the former shall control, and that nothing herein shall be construed as being a waiver of any of the terms, covenants and conditions of said leases.
The Collateral Assignment assigned to HNB "all rents, income and profits" arising from the Kaka`ako Properties.
The Collateral Assignment further provided that:
So long as there shall exist no default by the assignor . . . the assignor shall have the right to collect . . . all rents, income and profits arising under said lease or from the premises described therein and to retain, use and enjoy the same.
However:
[u]pon or at any time after default in the payment . . . the assignee without in any way waiving such default may at its option without notice and without regard to the adequacy of the security for the said principal sum, interest and indebtedness secured hereby and by said note and mortgage, either in person or by agent, with or without bringing any action or proceeding, or by a receiver appointed by a court, take possession of the premises described in said lease and/or mortgage and have, hold, manage, lease and operate the same on such terms and for such period of time as the assignee may deem proper and either with or without taking possession of said premises in its own name, demand, sue for or otherwise collect and receive all rents, income and profits of said premises, including those past due and unpaid . . . .
(Emphasis on the assignment of rents clause added.)
On October 4, 1996, HNB filed a complaint for foreclosure on the Kaka`ako Properties (Civil Number 96-4088). The complaint named, among others, Pohukaina, Cook, and Kona Country as defendants because each party had failed to make payments on its mortgage loans. In particular, HNB alleged that as of October 15, 1996, Pohukaina, Cook, and Kona Country owed the following:
Note A Principal $889,586.21 Interest from 7/30/96 to 10/15/96 at 20,258.71 10.75% per annum. Late charges 2,280.00 ___________ Total as of 10/15/96 $912,124.92
plus a per diem interest accrual of $261.29 per day for each day after October 15, 1996 until paid.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hawaii Ventures, LLC v. Otaka, Inc.
...appointed by the court shall be in accordance with the practice heretofore followed." (Emphasis added.)); Hawai`i Nat'l Bank v. Cook, 99 Hawai`i 334, 347, 55 P.3d 827, 840 (App.2000) (holding that "a commissioner is a neutral party appointed by the court and acts as an arm of the court") (i......
-
HAWAII NAT. BANK v. Cook
...of certiorari to review the opinion of the Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA) in Hawai`i Nat'l Bank v. Cook, 99 Hawaii 334, 55 P.3d 827, (Haw.Ct.App. 2000) [hereinafter, the "ICA's opinion" or "the majority"]. The majority affirmed the circuit court's: 1) findings of fact, conclusions of l......
-
Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Larrua
...benefit of the person or entity subsequently determined to be entitled to the property."). Hawai‘i Nat'l Bank v. Cook, 99 Hawai‘i 334, 346-47, 55 P.3d 827, 839-40 (App. 2000) ( Hawai‘i Nat'l Bank I ) (emphasis added), rev'd on other grounds by Hawai‘i Nat'l Bank II, 100 Hawai‘i 2, 58 P.3d 6......