Hawie v. Hawie

Decision Date27 March 1922
Docket Number22345
Citation128 Miss. 473,91 So. 131
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
PartiesHAWIE v. HAWIE

1 COURTS. Chancery court may not inquire into sanity of one under an indictment for murder.

Where one under indictment for murder is held in jail by an order of the circuit court, he is within the exclusive jurisdiction of that court, and the chancery court has no jurisdiction to inquire into his sanity under section 3219, Code 1906 (section 5561, Hemingway's Code).

2. INSANE PERSONS. Statute does not authorize circuit court to send prisoner under indictment to insane asylum.

There is no statutory provision in this state authorizing the circuit court or the circuit judge to send a prisoner under indictment for a crime to an insane asylum.

3. INSANE PERSONS. Where one indicted becomes insame, the circuit court must remand him to jail until he recovers his sanity.

In the absence of any such statute, where a prisoner after indictment becomes insane it is the duty of the circuit court or the circuit judge to remand him to jail until he recovers his sanity.

HON. V J. STRICKER, Chancellor. HON. C. J. STRICKER, Chancellor.

HON. C J. STRICKER, Chancellor.

Proceeding by A. C. Hawie against George Hawie for a writ of lunacy to test the sanity of the defendant. The chancery clerk declined to issue the writ, and his action was approved by the court and the plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

Decree affirmed.

L. M. Burch, for appellant.

H. C. Holden, Assistant Attorney-General, for appellee.

OPINION

SYKES, P. J.

The appellee, George Hawie was tried and convicted in the circuit court of Newton county of the crime of murder. From this conviction an appeal was prosecuted to this court, and the judgment of the circuit court was reversed, and the cause remanded. For a full history of this case see Howie v. State, 121 Miss. 197, 83 So. [91 So. 132] 158, 10 A. L. R. 205; and Hawie v. State, 125 Miss. 589, 88 So. 167. After his conviction in the circuit court of Newton county, and pending his appeal to this court, he was ordered by the circuit court of Newton county to be confined in the Hinds county jail at Jackson.

After the cause was reversed and remanded his brother, the appellant, A. C. Hawie, proceeding under section 3219, Code of 1906 (section 5561, Hemingway's Code), petitioned the chancery clerk of Hinds county to issue a writ of lunacy, and have the sanity of George Hawie tested as provided in that section. The district attorney of Newton county filed a plea to the jurisdiction of the chancery court of Hinds county. In this plea the history of this cause is briefly stated, and it is averred that George Hawie is in the legal custody of the circuit court of Newton county, and is confined in the Hinds county jail by order of that court, and that the chancery court of Hinds county has no jurisdiction of the subject-matter or of the person of George Hawie. The chancery clerk was of this opinion and declined to issue the writ, and his action in the matter was approved by the chancery court of the county, from which decree this appeal is prosecuted.

Geore Hawie is a resident citizen of the First judicial district of Hinds county, the district in which he instituted this proceeding.

It is the contention of the appellant that under section 159 of the Constitution the chancery court is vested with full jurisdiction in cases of idiocy, lunacy, and persons of unsound mind; that section 532, Code of 1906 (section 289, Hemingway's Code), is but a repetition of this jurisdiction, as laid down in the Constitution; that no other court in this state has any jurisdiction over an insane person, unless specially authorized by legislative enactment not in conflict with the Constitution.

It is the contention of the state that George Hawie is within the exclusive jurisdiction of the circuit court of Newton county, and that for this reason the chancery court of Hinds county has no jurisdiction to inquire into his sanity. It will be noted that George Hawie was indicted and convicted in the circuit court or Rankin county before any question as to his sanity was raised; that this question was raised after his conviction by petition for writ of error coram nobis, which writ was granted by this court, and that on that issue a jury found Hawie insane at the time of his trial in the circuit court of Rankin county. There has been no other inquiry into his sanity since that time.

In the last report of this case in 125 Miss. 589 at 596, 88 So. 167 this court held that, when a prisoner be found to be insane, his trial should not be proceeded with until he recovers sanity, and that, when he is called for trial, if a doubt arises as to his sanity the court should proceed to determine that question anew. A great number of states have statutory provisions under which a person under indictment for crime who becomes insane may be sent to an insane hospital until he recovers sanity. We have no such statute in this state. The only statute dealing with this subject is section 1540, Code of 1906 (section 1302, Hemingway's Code), which makes provision for the sending of one to an insane hospital who has been acquitted on the ground of insanity when the jury state that he is acquitted for this reason and is still insane and dangerous. Then, under these conditions, the circuit judge can order his confinement in the State Asylum. This is the only...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Sinclair v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • February 16, 1931
    ...is incapable of acting with criminal intent and cannot be held criminally responsible for his act. Howie v. State, 83 So. 158; Hawie v. Hawie, 91 So. 131; Grisson v. State, 62 Miss. 167; Smith State, 49 So. 945; Cunningham v. State, 56 Miss. 269; Kearney v. State, 8 So. 292; Ford v. State, ......
  • Jaquith v. Beckwith
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • November 12, 1963
    ...369 U.S. 705, 82 S.Ct. 1063, 8 L.Ed.2d 211 (1962); Anno., 32 A.L.R.2d 434 (1953); Anno., 142 A.L.R. 961 (1943). Hawie v. Hawie, 128 Miss. 473, 91 So. 131 (1922), involved a person held under indictment for murder and an attempt by the chancery court to inquire into his The circuit court had......
  • State ex rel. Standefer v. England
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • October 14, 1959
    ...Sec. 170, p. 264; State ex rel. Lamar v. Impey, 365 Mo. 437, 283 S.W.2d 480; State v. Hagerty, 152 Minn. 502, 189 N.W. 411; Hawie v. Hawie, 128 Miss. 473, 91 So. 131.5 Richey v. Baur, Mo., 298 S.W.2d 445.6 Hax v. O'Donnell, 234 Mo.App. 636, 117 S.W.2d 667(6); West St. Louis Trust Co. of St.......
  • Syphers v. Gladden
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • February 21, 1962
    ...411 (1922); Skinner v. State, 198 Miss. 505, 23 So.2d 501 (1945); Davis v. State, 151 Miss. 883, 119 So. 805 (1928); Hawie v. Hawie, 128 Miss. 473, 91 So. 131 (1922); State ex rel. Standefer v. England, 328 S.W.2d 732 (Mo.App.1959); State ex rel. Lamar v. Impey, 365 Mo. 437, 283 S.W.2d 480 ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT