Hawke v. Euyart
Decision Date | 16 September 1890 |
Citation | 46 N.W. 422,30 Neb. 149 |
Parties | HAWKE v. EUYART ET AL. |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
1. A codicil ratifying and confirming a will, in whole or in part, will amount to a republication of the will, bringing down its words, and causing it to speak as of the date of the codicil.
2. A devise in a father's will in favor of a son addicted to the intemperate use of intoxicating liquors, and who had intermarried with one Mrs. G. against his father's will, made in form to the executors of the will, directed that at the end of 10 years from his death, in case the son and legatee should have, in their judgment, thoroughly reformed of his intemperate habits, of his immoral consortings, and evil associations, and shall then be living, with evident promise so to continue during life, a virtuous, temperate, and commendable life, the executors should convey the lands and trust-funds devised to the son and legatee. Held that, in so far as the devise was conditional on the reformation of the son and devisee, the same will be upheld.
3. But a subsequent provision that such trust property and funds should not be transferred until the executors shall have satisfactory proof that the devisee “has permanently freed himself from all influence, connections, associations, cohabitations, and relations, of every name, character, and description, of and with Mrs. G., and her relatives, friends, and intimates,” held to be a condition against public policy, and void, and that upon the first condition, exempt from the second, the devisee will be entitled to the transfer and conveyance of the land and trust-funds of the legacy.
Appeal from district court, Otoe county; FIELD, Judge.John C. Watson, Frank P. Ireland, and L. W. Billingsley, for appellant.
M. L. Hay ward and E. F. Warren, for appellees.
The appellant alleged, in his petition to the county court of Otoe county, that he was the son and heir at law of Robert Hawke, late of said county, deceased, whose last will was offered for probate by Logan Euyart and George W. Hawke, executors named therein, and that he appeared and objected to the probate of said will for the reasons: (1) That no citation or notice was issued or served upon him. (2) That the paper purporting to be the last will and testament of deceased was not his will, but was obtained and procured by circumvention, and by ruse, on the part of Logan Euyart, one of the executors. (3) That the will is void, so far as appellant is concerned, as in absolute restraint of marriage, and against public policy; and that deceased was not, at the time of making it, of sufficient testamentary capacity to make a will; and that the contingency, upon which its bequest to appellant was to take effect, was too remote. The appellant asked that, if the will be admitted to probate, the estate depending upon the marriage condition of appellant be ordered to immediately take effect, absolved from the condition imposed, and that he be entitled to the property willed to him. Notice having been given by publication of the motion to admit the will to probate, there was a hearing in the county court on June 20, 1887. Nathaniel Adams and William F. N. Houser were sworn and examined as witnesses to the will, and the court found that the will and the several codicils thereto were duly executed by Robert Hawke, who was, at the time of executing the same, of full age, of sound mind and memory, and not under restraint or under influence of any kind, and was competent, in all respects, to devise real and personal estate; that said instrument is the last will and testament of said deceased, and ought to be allowed as such; and that the persons therein named as executors are appointed as such, upon giving bond in the sum of $30,000, with sufficient sureties, in accordance with the statute. To all of which the appellant objected, and took his appeal to the district court. There was a stipulation by the parties, proponents and contestant, that the appeal should apply and extend only to the matter of the bequest to William Hawke, and should not in any way affect the other devisees and legatees of the estate, the contestant asking no greater amount than is given him in the will; and he appeals only from the conditions and restrictions attached to such bequest. There was a trial in the district court, July 10, 1888, in which the proceedings of the county court were affirmed, and the petition of the appellant was dismissed, to which exceptions were taken, and the appeal brought into this court.
The bequest to appellant under the will dated February 16, 1884, is as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Graves v. First Nat. Bank in Grand Forks
...void. Brizendine v. American Trust & Savings Bank, 211 Ala. 694, 101 So. 618; Conrad v. Long, 33 Mich. 78; Hawke v. Euyart, 30 Neb. 149, 46 N.W. 422, 27 Am.St.Rep. 391; O'Brien v. Barkley et al., 78 Hun 609, 28 N.Y.S. 1049; Cruger v. Phelps et al., 21 Misc. 252, 47 N.Y.S. 61; In re Haight's......
-
Gerbing's Estate, In re
...50 N.E. 111; Tripp v. Payne (1930), 339 Ill. 178, 171 N.E. 131; Fleishman v. Bregal (1938), 174 Md. 87, 197 A. 593; Hawke v. Euyart (Neb.1890), 30 Neb. 149, 46 N.W. 442; In re Onora's Will (1954), 205 Misc. 531, 130 N.Y.S.2d 480; Graves v. First National Bank (N.D.1965), 138 N.W.2d 584; Fin......
-
Dwyer v. Kuchler
...211 Ala. 694, 101 So. 618; Tripp v. Payne, 339 Ill. 178, 171 N. E. 131; Witherspoon v. Brokaw, 85 Mo. App. 169; Hawke v. Euyart, 30 Neb. 149, 46 N. W. 422, 27 Am. St. Rep. 391; Whiton v. Snyder, 54 Hun, 552, 8 N. Y. S. 119; Conrad v. Long, 33 Mich. 78; Wren v. Bradley, 64 Eng. Reprint, 23; ......
-
In re Clarke's Estate
... ... her present husband, Henry Long, as his wife.' ... O'Brien ... v. Barkley, 78 Hun, 609, 28 N.Y.S. 1049; Hawke v ... Euyart, 30 Neb. 149, 46 N.W. 422, 27 Am.St.Rep. 391, may ... likewise be distinguished from the case at bar, in that the ... provisions in ... ...