Hawkins v. Bennett
Decision Date | 18 July 1968 |
Docket Number | No. 52576,52576 |
Parties | Robert HAWKINS, Appellant, v. John E. BENNETT, Warden Iowa State Penitentiary, Fort Madison, Iowa, Appellee. |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Robert Hawkins, pro se.
Richard C. Turner, Atty. Gen., William A. Claerhout, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Thomas E. Tucker, Johnson, Phelan & Tucker, Fort Madison, for appellee.
This is an appeal from denial of plaintiff's petition for writ of habeas corpus.
Robert Hawkins pleaded guilty to murder in the first degree. He was sentenced to life imprisonment. After 40 years in the penitentiary he challenged the legality of his confinement. We have been furnished and have examined the records from Johnson County where he was sentenced and the records and transcript of the evidence in Lee County from which this appeal comes to us.
From the records of Johnson County we learn that during the era of the 'noble experiment' an oasis for the thirsty known as 'Black Edna's' flourished in Iowa City. Liquor, poker and dice games and other activities were available and well patronized by both black and white customers.
On the evening of May 1, 1926 and continuing into the early hours of May 2 the place was jumping with activity but unfortunately complete harmony did not prevail. Hawkins was somewhat belligerent. Some of the games of chance were interrupted and then resumed. Following a dispute in a dice game over whether he had thrown a number 10 and made his point Hawkins left the room. He returned shortly armed with an ax. He chopped a Mr. Blair on the back of the head several times with the ax. Mr. Blair died as a result.
Mr. Hawkins was arrested and taken to jail.
The grand jury investigated and took testimony for several days. Thirty-eight witnesses, including a number of eye witnesses, were examined and the minutes of their testimony are attached to the indictment. On May 15, 1926 Hawkins was indicted and charged with murder in the first degree.
It would appear obvious from a look at the evidence available to the state that the accused faced formidable problems about what to do. Capital punishment was a possible penalty. The county attorney 'was not entirely sold on capital punishment,' and although there is nothing in the record to show that the accused or his attorneys knew what would happen the presiding judge was opposed to capital punishment.
On May 17 Hawkins appeared in court for arraignment, in person and with his attorneys, Hon. Ingalls Swisher and Mr. Edward F. Rate, both competent and experienced attorneys.
The record shows that Hawkins was duly and formally arraigned and entered a plea of guilty as charged and waived time for pronouncement of judgment.
The enrolled order then says:
'Ordered, adjudged and found that the defendant, Robert Hawkins, be and he is hereby committed to the State Penitentiary at Fort Madison, Iowa and confined therein at hard labor for the period of his natural life, for murder in the first degree, and that he be not allowed any bail on appeal.'
Mittimus was issued and he was delivered to the penitentiary on May 19, 1926.
On July 22, 1966, more than 40 years after his commitment, Robert Hawkins, plaintiff herein, filed in the district court of Lee County a petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. He listed 28 grounds and 12 additional subgrounds for granting the writ. Support was sought from the citation of many authorities. At the request of petitioner the matter was continued three times and finally heard on December 30, 1966.
Nowhere in the record do we find any claim or suggestion that he was not guilty.
The case before us differs from habeas corpus cases to determine custody of minor children. Our review here is not de novo. Gibson v. Lainson, 244 Iowa 1396, 1398, 60 N.W.2d 797. The burden rested on petitioner to prove his case by a preponderance of the evidence and the trial court's findings are binding on us if supported by substantial evidence. Herold v. Haugh, 259 Iowa 667, 669, 145 N.W.2d 657.
'1. That he was held incommunicado without counsel from May 2, 1926 until May 15th, 1926.
'2. That his plea of guilty was coerced.
'3. That he was inadequately represented by counsel.
The court then said:
The court annulled the writ and returned petitioner to the custody of the warden. We affirm.
III. We have before us the transcript of the hearing in habeas corpus. It appears that petitioner was treated with courtesy and consideration. He was granted every continuance requested. Before the hearing he stated he was ready to proceed. He was encouraged by the court to tell his full story. This is shown by the questions asked by the court.
* * *
* * *
' * * *
* * *
* * *'
Petitioner claimed he was held in jail 'without a defense of any kind and taken over and sentenced before the judge on May the 17th or 18th without an attorney or without a defense whatsoever.' He said his sentence was not legal. 'Natural life in prison without due process of law.'
Pursuant to previous requests by petitioner for a continuance hearing had been set for November 18, 1966. Mr. Edward L. O'Connor, who had been county attorney of Johnson County in 1926 had been called to testify on November 18 in the Lee County hearing. At the request of petitioner the hearing was continued until December 30, 1966. Mr. O'Connor had not been notified of the changed date and appeared at Fort Madison Courthouse on November 18. To avoid an extra trip by Mr. O'Connor and with permission of the court his testimony was taken by deposition and then offered on December 30. Mr. Hawkins was present while Mr. O'Connor testified.
We quote excerpts from his testimony:
Connor? A. As the County Attorney of Johnson County, Iowa, about the month of May, 1926. I became acquainted with the petitioner when he was brought into the City Jail at Iowa City, Iowa, on a charge of--The first charge that was brought was assault with intent to commit murder. His victim died four or five hours later; then the charge was changed to murder in the first degree, and at that time I became acquainted with the petitioner, Robert Hawkins.
Connor, did the petitioner, here, Robert Hawkins, plead guilty to the specific crime of murder in the first degree? A. He did.
Connor, at the time the defendant, here, or the petitioner, here, Robert Hawkins, entered his plea of guilty, was there any interrogation or any questioning by the court prior to the entry of sentence? A. Yes, there was.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Allison v. State
...the PCR action is the initial forum for challenging ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. See id. ; see also Hawkins v. Bennett , 160 N.W.2d 487, 492 (Iowa 1968) ("There is no constitutional right to appointment of counsel in all habeas corpus proceedings."); Larson v. Bennett , 160 N......
-
Hawkins v. Bennett
...hearing on December 30, 1966, that court denied appellant relief. The denial was affirmed by the Iowa Supreme Court. Hawkins v. Bennett, Iowa, 160 N.W.2d 487 (1968). On September 11, 1968, appellant instituted this action. He alleged four grounds for relief: (1) that his guilty plea was coe......
-
Evans v. Rosenberger
...Cummings v. Lainson, 239 Iowa 1193, 1196, 33 N.W.2d 395, 397, cert. den., 336 U.S. 944, 69 S.Ct. 811, 93 L.Ed. 1101; Hawkins v. Bennett (Iowa), 160 N.W.2d 487, 489 and citations. We consider only assigned errors and review only those matters which were properly raised and preserved below. 3......
-
Janvrin v. Haugh, 53734
...us if supported by substantial evidence. Larson v. Bennett, Iowa, 160 N.W.2d 303, 307 and authorities cited therein, and Hawkins v. Bennett, Iowa, 160 N.W.2d 487, 489. II. Original judgment and sentence of appellant-petitioner in Polk County was on July 15, Petition for writ of habeas corpu......