Hawkins v. Graham

Decision Date03 November 1879
Citation128 Mass. 20
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
PartiesHenry C. Hawkins & another v. Catherine Graham & trustee

Bristol. Appeal from the taxation of costs in a trustee process. The record showed the following facts:

The action was returnable at September term 1878 of the Superior Court. At that term, Henry Matthews, summoned as trustee answered that, at the time of the service of the writ upon him, he had not in his hands, possession or control any goods, effects or credits of the defendant; and that two other writs of other plaintiffs, returnable at the same term as the present writ, had been served upon him as alleged trustee; and prayed to be discharged, and for his costs. The trustee afterwards, at the same term, filed a supplemental answer, alleging that, since filing the original answer, he had learned that, previously to the service upon him of the writ in this action, there had been served upon him, as supposed trustee, a writ in another action against Graham which action was duly entered and was still pending; and that, between the time of service upon him of the writ in that action, and the service upon him of the writ in the present action, the pecuniary relations between him and the defendant had in no respect been changed. The defendant though summoned, did not appear; and the case was continued from term to term until June term 1879, when the defendant was defaulted, and the trustee discharged.

The trustee claimed a term fee and travel for each term that the case was in court, and an attorney's fee for the first term. The clerk allowed the term fee and travel for the first term, but disallowed the attorney's fee for that term, and also disallowed the costs of the subsequent terms. Brigham, C. J., affirmed the clerk's taxation of costs; and the trustee appealed to this court.

Taxation affirmed.

B. K. Lovatt, for the trustee.

W. H. Pierce, for the plaintiffs.

Gray C. J. Colt & Ames, JJ., absent.

OPINION

Gray C. J.

The trustee having filed answers at the first term, upon the face of which he appeared to be entitled to his discharge, and the plaintiffs having taken no step to avoid the effect thereof by further interrogatories or allegations, the trustee had no occasion to attend, and was not entitled to costs, at subsequent terms, while the case was still pending upon the docket and had not been disposed of as between the principal parties, no final judgment having...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Bernheim Bros. & Uri v. Brogan
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • February 11, 1889
    ... ... that this is a "proper case" in which to allow it ... Johnston v. Blinks, 68 Tex. 495; Hawkins v ... Graham, 128 Mass. 20; Waples Attach. 385, 386, 387; ... Mattingly v. Boyd, 20 How. 128, 133; ... O'Reilly v. Cleary, 8 Mo.App. 186; ... ...
  • A. Senior & Sons v. Brogan
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • January 28, 1889
    ...and a jury is not necessary, and that the allowance is proper under a statute like ours. Johnson v. Blanks, 68 Tex. 495; Hawkins v. Graham, 128 Mass. 20; Waples' 385-387; Mattingly v. Boyd, 20 How. (U.S.) 128; O'Reilly v. Cleary, 8 Mo.App. 186; Griffith v. Stackmuller, 14 Phila. 236; Vandus......
  • Carroll v. Daly
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • November 30, 1894
    ...of the superior court cannot be revised by this court upon matters of fact or discretion. Briggs v. Taunton, 110 Mass. 423; Hawkins v. Graham, 128 Mass. 20, 21; Hubner Hoffman, 106 Mass. 346. While an appeal will lie to this court from the judgment of the superior court, it brings before th......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT