Hawkins v. Massie
| Decision Date | 31 May 1876 |
| Citation | Hawkins v. Massie, 62 Mo. 552 (Mo. 1876) |
| Parties | CASTLEREIGH C. HAWKINS, Plaintiff in Error, v. JOHN C. MASSIE, et al., Defendants in Error. |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Error to Buchanan Circuit Court.
B. R. Vineyard, for Plaintiff in Error.
Collins & Loan, for Defendants in Error.
The case presented by the record is shortly this:
This cause came to the Buchanan circuit court by change of venue from the Holt circuit court. On its arrival an amended petition was filed, and new parties defendant brought in thereby. Demurrers were sustained to this petition, though no formal judgment was entered. Plaintiff obtained leave to file a second amended petition, which he did at a subsequent term. The second amended petition was, with a few slight changes, of the same general tenor and effect as the first amended one. A motion was filed by defendants to “strike out” this second amended petition. This motion it seems was successful, though no final judgment was entered thereon. This entry, however, which has reference to the motion, appears of record.
...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
United States v. Gentry
... ... action. The original complaint becomes functus officio from ... the date of the filing of its successor. Hawkins v ... Massie, 62 Mo. 552, 553; State v. Simpkins, 77 ... Iowa, 676, 678, 42 N.W. 516; Cramer v. Mack (C.C.) ... 12 F. 803, 804, 20 Blatchf. 479; ... ...
-
Estes v. Fry
... ... an abandonment, by him, of the original petition. Young ... v. Woolback, 33 Mo. 110; Hawkins v. Massee, 62 ... Mo. 552; Rand v. Grubbs, 26 Mo.App. 595; Ticknar ... v. Voorhies, 46 Mo. 110. Therefore, when defendants ... filed their ... ...
-
Ingwerson v. Chicago & Alton Ry. Co.
...The demurrer to plaintiff's evidence should have been sustained. Where an amended petition is filed the original is abandoned. Hawkins v. Massie, 62 Mo. 552; v. Cleveland, 162 Mo. 317; Bobb v. Bobb, 89 Mo. 411; Hubbard v. Quisenberry, 32 Mo.App. 472; Roberts v. Ins. Co., 26 Mo.App. 92; Unit......
-
Brinton v. Thomas
...pleading. This is true with reference to petitions, answers and all motions known to pleading. 28 Cyclopedia, Vol. page 14; Hawkins v. Massie, 62 Mo. 552; Roberts State Insurance Co., 26 Mo.App. 92; Ingwersson v. Railroad, 205 Mo. 335. (4) One of the grounds for sustaining said motion as gi......