Hawkins v. Massie

Decision Date31 May 1876
CitationHawkins v. Massie, 62 Mo. 552 (Mo. 1876)
PartiesCASTLEREIGH C. HAWKINS, Plaintiff in Error, v. JOHN C. MASSIE, et al., Defendants in Error.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Error to Buchanan Circuit Court.

B. R. Vineyard, for Plaintiff in Error.

Collins & Loan, for Defendants in Error.

SHERWOOD, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court.

The case presented by the record is shortly this:

This cause came to the Buchanan circuit court by change of venue from the Holt circuit court. On its arrival an amended petition was filed, and new parties defendant brought in thereby. Demurrers were sustained to this petition, though no formal judgment was entered. Plaintiff obtained leave to file a second amended petition, which he did at a subsequent term. The second amended petition was, with a few slight changes, of the same general tenor and effect as the first amended one. A motion was filed by defendants to “strike out” this second amended petition. This motion it seems was successful, though no final judgment was entered thereon. This entry, however, which has reference to the motion, appears of record.

“Come now the parties in the above entitled cause by their respective attorneys, and the motion to strike out the second amended petition of said plaintiff, is now here taken up, argued and submitted to the court, and is by the court sustained; and the said plaintiff failing to file any further pleadings in this cause, and electing to stand on the pleadings herein, final judgment is now here by the court rendered for the said defendants upon the demurrer to plaintiff's...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
15 cases
  • United States v. Gentry
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • November 10, 1902
    ... ... action. The original complaint becomes functus officio from ... the date of the filing of its successor. Hawkins v ... Massie, 62 Mo. 552, 553; State v. Simpkins, 77 ... Iowa, 676, 678, 42 N.W. 516; Cramer v. Mack (C.C.) ... 12 F. 803, 804, 20 Blatchf. 479; ... ...
  • Estes v. Fry
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 17, 1901
    ... ... an abandonment, by him, of the original petition. Young ... v. Woolback, 33 Mo. 110; Hawkins v. Massee, 62 ... Mo. 552; Rand v. Grubbs, 26 Mo.App. 595; Ticknar ... v. Voorhies, 46 Mo. 110. Therefore, when defendants ... filed their ... ...
  • Ingwerson v. Chicago & Alton Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • July 1, 1907
    ...The demurrer to plaintiff's evidence should have been sustained. Where an amended petition is filed the original is abandoned. Hawkins v. Massie, 62 Mo. 552; v. Cleveland, 162 Mo. 317; Bobb v. Bobb, 89 Mo. 411; Hubbard v. Quisenberry, 32 Mo.App. 472; Roberts v. Ins. Co., 26 Mo.App. 92; Unit......
  • Brinton v. Thomas
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • May 31, 1909
    ...pleading. This is true with reference to petitions, answers and all motions known to pleading. 28 Cyclopedia, Vol. page 14; Hawkins v. Massie, 62 Mo. 552; Roberts State Insurance Co., 26 Mo.App. 92; Ingwersson v. Railroad, 205 Mo. 335. (4) One of the grounds for sustaining said motion as gi......
  • Get Started for Free