Hawkins v. State

Decision Date28 October 1964
Docket NumberNo. 37188,37188
Citation383 S.W.2d 416
PartiesJerry HAWKINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals

No attorney of record on appeal for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

The offense is theft by bailee; the punishment, 5 days in jail and a fine of $75.

The State does not seek affirmance of this conviction for the reason that there is no allegation in the complaint and information as to the value of the property alleged to have been appropriated.

Without such an allegation the punishment cannot be determined. Art. 1429, Sec. 1, Vernon's Ann.P.C.; 5 Branch's Ann.P.C. 2d Ed., Sec. 2674, p. 120; Price v. State, 165 Tex.Cr.R. 326, 308 S.W.2d 47, and cases cited.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution under the complaint and information is ordered dismissed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Benoit v. State, s. 54296-54300
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 25 Mayo 1977
    ...property must be averred where the amount of injury is an essential element in the punishment.' (Emphasis Supplied) "In Hawkins v. State, 383 S.W.2d 416 (Tex.Cr.App.1964), this court said in a prosecution under Article 1429, Sec. 1, Vernon's " 'Without such an allegation the punishment cann......
  • Standley v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 15 Enero 1975
    ...property must be averred where the amount of injury is an essential element in the punishment.' (Emphasis Supplied) In Hawkins v. State, 383 S.W.2d 416 (Tex.Cr.App.1964), this court said in a prosecution under Article 1429, Sec. 1, Vernon's 'Without such an allegation the punishment cannot ......
  • Wilson v. State, 09-91-142
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 12 Agosto 1992
    ...the grade of the offense and the punishment. Thus it is axiomatic that failure to allege a value is fatal, see Hawkins v. State, 383 S.W.2d 416 (Tex.Crim.App.1964), as is failure to prove a value, see Price v. State, 165 Tex.Crim. 326, 308 S.W.2d 47 Thus the question under Almanza v. State,......
  • Dedonato v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 5 Abril 1990
    ...which may affect the degree or kind of punishment. Without such allegations, the punishment cannot be determined. Hawkins v. State, 383 S.W.2d 416, 417 (Tex.Crim.App.1964). Without the facts necessary to determine punishment, the indictment in Standley was held to be fundamentally defective......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT