Hawley v. WAYNE DALE CONSTRUCTION
Decision Date | 18 December 2001 |
Docket Number | No. 626P01.,626P01. |
Citation | 558 S.E.2d 868 |
Parties | Bart HAWLEY v. WAYNE DALE CONSTRUCTION; and North Carolina Farm Bureau Insurance Company. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Brenton D. Adams, Dunn, for Bart Hawley.
Dawn M. Dillon, Raleigh, for Dale Const. & Farm Bureau Jns. Prior report: 146 N.C.App. 423, 552 S.E.2d 269.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th day of December 2001."
To continue reading
Request your trial10 cases
-
Richardson v. Maxim Healthcare/Allegis
...none or some of the evidence." Hawley v. Wayne Dale Constr., 146 N.C.App. 423, 428, 552 S.E.2d 269, 272, disc. rev. denied, 355 N.C. 211, 558 S.E.2d 868 (2001). It is not for this Court to evaluate the comparative weight of Dr. Dalldorf's and Dr. Kuzma's testimony. Competent evidence suppor......
-
Richardson v. Maxim Healthcare/Allegis
...none or some of the evidence." Hawley v. Wayne Dale Constr., 146 N.C.App. 423, 428, 552 S.E.2d 269, 272, disc. rev. denied, 355 N.C. 211, 558 S.E.2d 868 (2001). It is not for this Court to evaluate the comparative weight of Dr. Dalldorf's and Dr. Kuzma's testimony. Competent evidence suppor......
-
Richardson v. Maxim Healthcare/Allegis Group, No. COA06-875 (N.C. App. 10/2/2007)
...none or some of the evidence."Hawley v. Wayne Dale Constr., 146 N.C. App. 423, 428, 552 S.E.2d 269, 272, disc. rev. denied, 355 N.C. 211, 558 S.E.2d 868 (2001). It is not for this Court to evaluate the comparative weight of Dr. Dalldorf's and Dr. Kuzma's testimony. Competent evidence suppor......
-
Whitfield v. Laboratory Corp. of America
...to medical records. Hawley v. Wayne Dale Constr., 146 N.C.App. 423, 428-29, 552 S.E.2d 269, 273, disc. review denied, 355 N.C. 211, 558 S.E.2d 868 (2001). However, this rule does not prohibit a party from taking depositions if the party believes a deposition will be more useful than stipula......
Request a trial to view additional results