Hawwat v. Heckler, 84 C 0914.
Decision Date | 12 December 1984 |
Docket Number | No. 84 C 0914.,84 C 0914. |
Citation | 608 F. Supp. 106 |
Parties | Durgham HAWWAT, Plaintiff, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois |
Gerald B. Saltzberg, Fishman & Fishman & Saltzberg, P.C., Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.
Dan K. Webb, U.S. Atty. by William T. Clabault, Asst. U.S. Atty., Donna Morros Weinstein, Regional Atty., Dept. of Health and Human Services, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.
Before the Court are the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, both motions are denied and this cause is remanded for further proceeding consistent with this opinion.
Durgham Hawwat is 63 years old with four years of schooling in Palestine. He cannot read or write English and he speaks very little English. In order to understand English-speaking persons, plaintiff requires an interpreter.
Plaintiff claimed disability by reason of asthma and breathing impairments. One of plaintiff's treating physicians, Dr. Isa Ziadek, concluded that plaintiff has "advanced obstructive airway disease with severe respiratory insufficiency which is fully disabling him." Tr. 129. Another treating physician, Dr. J. Lafair, concluded that plaintiff suffers from "severe chronic asthma and a degree of respiratory insufficiency which would limit his ability to be fully active." Tr. 122. The ALJ, however, rejected these reports and, instead, relying upon the report of a consulting physician, Dr. B. Stevens, the ALJ concluded that plaintiff "does not have any breathing impairment which would preclude his past relevant light machine work." Tr. 9.
At a hearing before the ALJ on August 11, 1983, plaintiff was not represented by an attorney, and since he is unable to communicate in English, an interpreter was necessary. Even with the aid of the interpreter, however, the record reveals obvious communication difficulties. Shortly after the hearing began, the ALJ noted:
Tr. 17-18. Later in the hearing, a witness informed the ALJ that the plaintiff was "hard to translate." Tr. 33. Some of the plaintiff's and witnesses' testimony at the hearing was reported as "inaudible" by the court reporter. See Tr. 21, 25, 33, 34, 37, 38, 39. Finally, three medical reports from physicians were accepted by the ALJ which contain various foreign language notations. The record does not indicate whether these reports were ever translated into English before the ALJ rendered his decision.
A claimant in a Social Security hearing must be informed of the statutory right to have an attorney present at the administrative hearing. Smith v. Schweiker, 677 F.2d 826, 828 (11th Cir.1982). The claimant, however, may waive this right if given sufficient information to enable him to intelligently decide whether to retain counsel or proceed pro se. Id. The information necessary to ensure an intelligent and knowing waiver of counsel includes an explanation of the valuable role that an attorney could play in the proceedings, the possibility of free counsel, and the limitations on attorneys' fees to 25 percent of any eventual awards. Smith v. Schweiker, 677 F.2d at 829; Clark v. Schweiker, 652 F.2d 399, 403 (5th Cir.1981). When there is a possibility that a claimant may be incompetent or have a mental illness, the ALJ should explain the right to counsel and the role of an attorney in the hearing in even greater detail and with greater attention toward ensuring that the claimant understands these issues. Smith v. Secretary of HEW, 587 F.2d 857, 860 (7th Cir.1978).
The showing of a violation of a claimant's statutory right to counsel is not, by itself, cause for remand unless prejudice or unfairness to the claimant can also be shown. Smith v. Secretary of HEW, 587 F.2d at 860; Sykes v. Finch, 443 F.2d 192, 194 (7th Cir.1971). Prejudice to the claimant may be demonstrated by showing that the ALJ did not fulfill his or her obligation to develop a full and fair hearing. Smith v. Secretary of HEW, 587 F.2d at 860. The ALJ has a duty in all cases to develop a full and fair record but, where the right to counsel has not been effectively waived, the ALJ's obligation is heightened. Smith v. Schweiker, 677 F.2d at 829; Cowart v. Schweiker, 662 F.2d 731, 735 (11th Cir. 1981); Clark v. Schweiker, 652 F.2d 399, 404 (5th Cir.1981); Cannon v. Harris, 651 F.2d 513, 519 (7th Cir.1981); Smith v. Secretary of HEW, 587 F.2d at 860. This heightened duty requires the ALJ "to scrupulously probe into, inquire of and explore for all of the relevant facts." Cannon v. Harris, 651 F.2d at 519; Smith v. Secretary of HEW, 587 F.2d at 860; Gold v. Secretary of HEW, 463 F.2d 38, 43 (4th Cir.1972). The ALJ must be "especially diligent in ensuring that favorable as well as unfavorable facts and circumstances are elicited." Thompson v. Schweiker, 665 F.2d 936, 941 (9th Cir.1982) (quoting Rosa v. Weinberger, 381 F.Supp. 377, 381 (E.D. N.Y.1974)). "The ALJ's failure to pursue relevant avenues of inquiry, or to assist the claimant, who appeared pro se, deprives the claimant of his right to an impartial decision based on an inadequate record." Thompson,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Wiszowaty v. Astrue
...in even greater detail and with greater attention toward ensuring that the claimant understands these issues.” Hawwat v. Heckler, 608 F.Supp. 106, 108 (N.D.Ill.1984) (citing Smith v. Sec. of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 587 F.2d 857, 860 (7th Cir.1978)). When an ALJ does not obtain a valid waiv......
-
Wiszowaty v. Astrue
...in even greater detail and with greater attention toward ensuring that the claimant understands these issues." Hawwat v. Heckler, 608 F. Supp. 106, 108 (N.D. Ill. 1984) (citing Smith v. Sec. of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 587 F.2d 857, 860 (7th Cir. 1978)). When an ALJ does not obtain a valid ......
-
Frank v. Chater
...cases where shortage of funds is likely to be an issue for the claimants.'" Thompson, 933 F.2d at 585 (quoting Hawwat v. Heckler, 608 F.Supp. 106, 109 (N.D.Ill.1984)). If the claimant does not qualify for free legal services, (s)he should be aware of the possibility of a contingency agreeme......
-
Delgado v. Astrue
...hearing. The ALJ's duty to develop a full and fair record is heightened when the claimant proceeds without counsel. Hawwat v. Heckler, 608 F.Supp. 106, 109 (N.D. Ill 1984). This heightened duty requires the ALJ to "scrupulously and conscientiously. . .probe into, inquire of, and explore for......