Hayden v. Zerbst
Decision Date | 28 March 1908 |
Citation | 94 P. 909,49 Wash. 103 |
Parties | HAYDEN v. ZERBST et al. |
Court | Washington Supreme Court |
Appeal from Superior Court, Clarke County; W. W. McCredie, Judge.
Action by the Portland & Seattle Railway Company against Mary Jane Hayden and another. From a judgment for plaintiff and her codefendant, Mary Jane Hayden appeals. Affirmed.
McMaster & Back, for appellant.
E. M Green, for respondents.
The Portland & Seattle Railway Company brought an action against the appellant and the respondent Reinhold Zerbst to condemn for railway purposes all of lot 8 in block 35 in the city of Vancouver, as platted by Esther Short. These two defendants each answered separately, Reinhold Zerbst claiming to be the owner of the whole lot, and Mary Jane Hayden claiming an undivided one-half interest therein. Thereafter a judgment in condemnation was entered, and the lot was taken by the railway company. The damages to the owner were assessed at $1,200, which was paid into court. Thereupon the court tried out the question of title to the lot, in order to determine the proper disposition of the $1,200. Upon this trial the court found that Reinhold Zerbst was entitled to all the money, and judgment was entered accordingly. Mary Jane Hayden appeals from that order.
There is no dispute about the facts. They are principally of record, and are as follows: The lot in question was a part of the donation land claim of Amos Short and wife, Esther Short. In 1855 this lot was platted as a part of Vancouver by Esther Short. In 1859 Esther Short, by a quitclaim deed, conveyed the lot to Sumner Barker. Thereafter there were many other conveyances of portions of the Short donation claim, and in order to perfect the title, which had become quite complicated and uncertain, a committee purchased from the heirs of Esther Short all their interest in the addition and subsequently, on May 10, 1880, this committee deeded the lot in question to six parties, one being Gay Hayden. Gay Hayden and Mary Jane Hayden, the appellant, were husband and wife from the year 1880 until May, 1902. On March 10, 1886 Gay Hayden and Mary Jane Hayden, his wife, entered into an agreement as follows: This agreement was recorded in the record of deeds in the auditor's office of Clarke county, where the land was located. Thereafter Gay Hayden and Mary Jane Hayden lived separate and apart, and conducted business separately. They bought and sold real estate without the other joining in the conveyances. In 1892 the other five parties who had obtained title from the heirs of Esther Short conveyed by quitclaim deed all their interest in the lot in question to Gay Hayden. Mary Jane Hayden joined in this deed to her husband. In March, 1893, Gay Hayden obtained a tax deed for this lot from the city of Vancouver, being the purchaser at a tax sale. He also in the same year obtained a tax deed from the county, being the purchaser at a county tax sale. In 1894 he also...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Leaf v. Codd
... ... is estopped to deny her signature. (21 C. J. 1113, 1145, ... 1151; Kuriger v. Joest, 22 Ind.App. 633, 52 N.E ... 764, 54 N.E. 414; Hayden v. Zerbst, 49 Wash. 103, 94 ... P. 909; Helwig v. Fogelsong, 166 Iowa 715, 148 N.W ... 990; Green v. Hulse, 57 Colo. 238, 142 P. 416; Lane ... ...
-
Crosby v. Commissioner
...petitioner and her husband succeeded in effecting a severance of their community property into two separate estates. Hayden v. Zerbst, 49 Wash. 103, 94 Pac. 909 (1908). The petitioner contends, however, that notwithstanding the partition agreement, the petitioner and her husband continued t......
-
Sponogle v. Sponogle
... ... makes it thereafter her separate property under our laws ... Rem. & Bal. Code, § 8766; Hayden v. Zerbst, 49 Wash ... 103, 94 P. 909; Stewart v. Kleinschmidt, 51 Wash ... 90, 97 P. 1105; Christopher v. Ferris, 55 Wash. 534, ... ...
- Johnson v. Great Northern Ry. Co.