Hayes v. City of Cambridge

Decision Date13 January 1885
CitationHayes v. City of Cambridge, 138 Mass. 461 (Mass. 1885)
PartiesAnna Hayes v. City of Cambridge
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

Argued November 17, 1884.

Middlesex.

Exceptions overruled.

W. E Russell, for the plaintiff.

J. W Hammond, for the defendant.

Field & Colburn, JJ., absent. Morton, C. J.

OPINION

Morton, C. J.

The plaintiff was injured, on February 7, 1882, by stepping into a hole in a street-crossing, caused by an accumulation of snow and ice. At the second trial, after the decision reported in 136 Mass. 402, the defendant introduced evidence tending to show that on January 31, and on February 4 and 5, there had been two very heavy snow-storms; and also evidence tending to show the length of the streets it had to clear, and their condition after the storms, the amount of labor it had to do on its streets, the amount it did, and the expenses incurred and the time and labor involved, with a view of showing that the defect which caused the injury could not have been remedied by reasonable care and diligence on its part. Pub. Sts. c. 52, § 18. Rooney v. Randolph, 128 Mass. 580. Hayes v. Cambridge, 136 Mass. 402.

The plaintiff offered in evidence an ordinance of the city, which provides that the tenant, occupant, or abutting owner of land shall, within twenty-four hours after a fall of snow, clear the sidewalks in front of his premises, under a penalty of not less than two nor more than twenty dollars. The court excluded the evidence; and the plaintiff excepted.

The duty of clearing the streets and making them safe and convenient for travellers is primarily upon the city. The ordinance, if valid, does not excuse it from this...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Mills v. City of Philadelphia
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • July 21, 1898
    ...Apple, 35 Pa. 284; Ervin v. P. & R.R.R., 89 Pa. 71; McNerney v. Reading City, 150 Pa. 611; Cromarty v. Boston, 127 Mass. 329; Hayes v. Cambridge, 138 Mass. 461. STERRETT, C.J., WILLIAMS, McCOLLUM, DEAN and FELL, JJ. OPINION MR. JUSTICE FELL: The facts proved at the trial would not have warr......
  • Fortin v. Inhabitants of Easthampton
    • United States
    • Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • October 21, 1887
    ...it from its liabilities for defects. "Proof of an ordinance is no proof that the work was done by the abutters under it." Hayes v. Cambridge, 138 Mass. 461. There was evidence that the town had notice of the defect, or might have had notice thereof by the exercise of reasonable care and dil......
  • Whitfield v. City of Meridian
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • May 20, 1889
    ... ... Edenton. 90 N.C. 431; ... Wilson v. Atlanta, 63 Ga.; Kenyon v ... Indianapolis, 1 Wil. (Ind.) 139; Moody v ... Osgood, 54 N.Y. 488; Hayes v. Cambridge, 138 ... Mass. 461; Rugles v. Nevada, 63 Iowa 185 ... The ... fact that the city had no light at the dangerous place is ... ...
  • Weeks v. Inhabitants of Needham
    • United States
    • Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • May 9, 1892
    ... ... the alleged defect. Rooney v. Randolph, 128 Mass ... 580; Hayes v. Cambridge, 136 Mass. 402, 138 Mass ... 461; Sanders v. Palmer, 154 Mass. 475, 28 N.E. 778 ... ...
  • Get Started for Free