Hayes v. S. S. Kresge Co.
Decision Date | 11 January 1937 |
Docket Number | No. 18794.,18794. |
Citation | 100 S.W.2d 325 |
Parties | HAYES v. S. S. KRESGE CO. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; Albert A. Ridge, Judge.
"Not to be published in State Reports."
Action by Elizabeth Hayes against the S. S. Kresge Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
Reversed.
H. L. Jost and Roger C. Slaughter, both of Kansas City, for appellant.
John R. Murphy, of Kansas City, for respondent.
This is an action for damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment in the sum of $3,000.00. Defendant has appealed.
The facts show that plaintiff, a lady of about 27 years of age, was injured by falling upon a flight of stairs in defendant's retail store in Kansas City. The stairs were situated at the rear or the east end of the first floor of the store. Between that floor and the second floor there was a landing at which the stairway divided, one set of stairs finishing the flight to the second floor was situated to the south and the other to the north of the landing.
Plaintiff had worked as a saleslady in an adjoining store continuously for three years next preceding the date of the accident. During this time it was her habit to patronize the beauty shop in the defendant's store, which was located immediately at the head of the south stairs on the second floor, going there about every two weeks. She always used the same stairs in going to and returning from the beauty shop and had not, at any time, experienced any mishap or fall. She had never paid any attention to the condition of the steps and did not notice their condition the day of her fall.
On December 20, 1933, plaintiff went up the stairs in question to the beauty shop and in returning she started to descend the south flight. The store was crowded and people were all around her. She had hold of the right railing of the stairway, holding on with her right hand and was looking ahead watching the steps. When she reached the third step from the top she stepped off of the same with her right foot, intending to step to the fourth step, but she either slipped or caught her left foot and fell, resulting in her injury. Plaintiff at the time was wearing shoes with french heels, three inches high, "about an inch across the bottom" and "about one-half inch through."
Plaintiff's evidence tends to show that the stairs where she fell were made of Tennessee marble and that they were badly worn by use. The stairs were five feet two inches long; eleven inches wide with risers seven-eighths of an inch thick and five inches high. The tread was one and one-eighth inches thick in its original condition so that the riser and tread combined were about six inches high. The third step, or the one in question, was worn at about the center, north and south, one-eighth to one-fourth inch. However, the stairs had a banister on each side and were there worn deeper where people walked, as did plaintiff, in using the banisters. At this place the step in question was worn away about one-half its thickness or five-eighths of an inch at its deepest point, which was at the outside edge or "nose" of the tread. The worn place was more or less elliptical in shape and was uneven. It was not a perfect square depression but was scooped out more or less rising toward the edges and getting larger toward the center. It was less worn at the rear than at the front where the shoe would strike "the nosing of the tread." This worn place was referred to as a "cupping," the lowest part of the wear being at the riser at the outer edge of the tread. The place was not evenly worn and was slick.
One of plaintiff's witnesses, a stone and marble worker, testified that "in all my experience I have never seen tread like that worn down like they are."
There is no claim made by plaintiff that there was any defect in the step except that it was badly worn. She testified that there was ample light present; that the step was clean and there was nothing on it to cause her to fall.
The petition alleges that plaintiff slipped and fell on the stairs. The negligence pleaded was that defendant "caused and permitted the stone steps aforesaid to become rounded and curved at the edges, indented and irregular on the surface, tilted and excessively sleek and slippery and generally unfit for pedestrians to use."
In his opening statement counsel for plaintiff stated that plaintiff's "left foot caught on this tread of the step and she was thrown from there on down the stairs."
Plaintiff was the only witness to her fall. At the trial she testified, on direct examination, that "my foot caught or slipped there on the third step, as I had my other foot out ready to step down, and it throwed me." During the time that plaintiff was on the witness stand the court adjourned for the noon recess and, in the afternoon, she was cross-examined by the defendant and testified as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Schonlau v. Terminal R. Ass'n of St. Louis
...(5) His testimony is so self-contradictory that it would be a burlesque upon justice to permit him to recover in this case. Hayes v. S.S. Kresge Co., 100 S.W.2d 325; Steele v. Kansas City So. R. Co., 265 Mo. 97. (6) The verdict herein is "unquestionably wrong, a clear case of injustice, and......
-
Stephens v. Kansas City Gas Co.
... ... was a proximate cause of the injury. Warner v ... Railroad, 178 Mo. 175, 77 S.W. 67; Hayes v. Kresge ... Co., 100 S.W.2d 325. (17) Where two inferences are ... contradictory respecting ultimate facts, such constitutes a ... failure of ... ...
-
Neal v. Kansas City Public Service Co.
... ... the evidence at the close of all the evidence. No submissible ... case was made. Hayes v. Kresge, 100 S.W.2d l.c. 328; ... Pedigo v. Roseberry, 102 S.W.2d l.c. 608; ... Pietraschke v. Pollnow, 147 S.W.2d l.c. 170; ... Strother ... ...
-
Hardwick v. Kansas City Gas Co.
...for which the defendant would be liable was the proximate cause of the injury. Warner v. Railroad, 178 Mo. 175, 77 S.W. 67; Hayes v. Kresge Co., 100 S.W.2d 325. (7) Where inferences are contradictory respecting ultimate facts, such constitutes a failure of proof thereof, as it leaves it in ......