Haynes v. State, 90-2304
| Decision Date | 26 February 1991 |
| Docket Number | No. 90-2304,90-2304 |
| Citation | 16 Fla. L. Weekly 607,575 So.2d 1341 |
| Parties | 16 Fla. L. Weekly 607 David Scott HAYNES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Barbara M. Linthicum, Public Defender, Abel Gomez, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Suzanne G. Printy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
Appellant/defendant, David Scott Haynes, appeals an order directing him to pay $704 in additional restitution to the victim. We affirm the $600 portion of the order, representing 30 hours in lost overtime pay, finding the victim's testimony to have been undisputed and the award to have been specifically authorized by section 775.089(2)(c), Florida Statutes. However, we reverse the $35 portion representing meal expenses associated with the victim's travel to the restitution hearing, since the victim testified that the cost of his meals was actually $20. We therefore remand for the total amount of restitution ordered to be reduced by $15.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED and REMANDED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Neal v. State, 96-2939
...permit reimbursement for lost wages and travel expenses. E.g., Vanlieu v. State, 630 So.2d 1218 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Haynes v. State, 575 So.2d 1341 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Self v. State, 458 So.2d 1222 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). We see no reason to reach a different result under the current, somewh......
- Charlip v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 90-1689