Hazim v. Winter
| Decision Date | 16 December 1996 |
| Citation | 234 A.D.2d 422,651 N.Y.S.2d 149 |
| Parties | Augustine HAZIM, Appellant, v. Tibor WINTER, et al., Defendants, Jacob Fleischer, Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Steven Louros, New York City, for appellant.
Frank A. Composto, Brooklyn, (Stacey E. Charkey, of counsel), for respondent.
Before BRACKEN, J.P., and MILLER, JOY and KRAUSMAN, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Yoswein, J.), dated June 27, 1995, as denied his motion for leave to enter a default judgment against the defendant Jacob Fleischer and granted that defendant leave to answer the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is modified by deleting the last decretal paragraph thereof and substituting therefor the following: "the plaintiff's motion for leave to enter a default judgment against the defendant Jacob Fleischer is denied without prejudice to renewal on proper papers"; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The plaintiff's motion for leave to enter a default judgment was not based on an affidavit by a party as required by CPLR 3215(f), but rather on a complaint verified by the plaintiff's attorney. "[A] complaint verified by counsel amounts to no more than an attorney's affidavit and is therefore insufficient to support entry of judgment pursuant to CPLR 3215" (Mullins v. DiLorenzo, 199 A.D.2d 218, 219, 606 N.Y.S.2d 161; see, Goodyear v. Weinstein, 224 A.D.2d 387, 638 N.Y.S.2d 108; Feffer v. Malpeso, 210 A.D.2d 60, 619 N.Y.S.2d 46; Joosten v. Gale, 129 A.D.2d 531, 534, 514 N.Y.S.2d 729). "Under these circumstances, entry of a default judgment would be erroneous and the judgment would be a nullity" (Goodyear v. Weinstein, supra, at 387, 638 N.Y.S.2d 108).
Although the plaintiff has not demonstrated on these papers that he is entitled to a default judgment, the court erred in sua sponte granting leave to defendant Fleischer to serve an answer without the necessary showing of a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense, and that portion of the order is therefore stricken. The plaintiff may renew his motion for leave to enter a default judgment on proper papers in accordance herewith.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Bank of N.Y. v. Mulligan
...625, 725 N.Y.S.2d 854 [2d Dept 2001]; Finnegan v. Sheahan, 269 A.D.2d 491, 703 N.Y.S.2d 734 [2d Dept 2000]; Hazim v. Winter, 234 A.D.2d 422, 651 N.Y.S.2d 149 [2d Dept 1996] ). Instead, plaintiff BNY submitted an affidavit of merit and amount due by Ely Harless, “an employee of Countrywide H......
-
Beckford ex rel. McKenzie v. Morse-Spalding
...v. Sycamore Realty Corp., 31 AD3d 721, 818 N.Y.S.2d 463 ; Blam v. Netcher, 17 AD3d 495, 496, 793 N.Y.S.2d 464 ; Hazim v. Winter, 234 AD2d 422, 651 N.Y.S.2d 149 ). This alleged defect would not render the default judgment a nullity nor, in the absence of a reasonable excuse and meritorious d......
-
Walker v. Simmsparris
...an affidavit of merit or a complaint that is verified by someone with personal knowledge (see CPLR 3215[f]; Hazim v. Winter, 234 A.D.2d 422, 651 N.Y.S.2d 149 [2d Dep't. 1996]). Defendant Michele SimmParris' motion to dismiss or alternatively, for summary judgment, is denied as academic as d......
-
Bank of N.Y. for the Certificateholders Cwalt, Inc. v. Cepeda
...Dept 2002]; Parratta v. McAllister, 283 A.D.2d 625 [2d Dept 2001]; Finnegan v. Sheahan, 269 A.D.2d 491 [2d Dept 2000]; Hazim v. Winter, 234 A.D.2d 422 [2d Dept 1996] ). Instead, plaintiff BNY submits an affidavit of merit by Elysha James Armbruster, who alleges “I am authorized to sign this......
-
A nullity or not? The status of a default judgment entered absent compliance with CPLR 3215(f).
...v. Wexler, 277 A.D.2d 266, 267, 715 N.Y.S.2d 873, 873 (App. Div. 2d Dep't 2000) ("To the extent that our decisions in Hazim v. Winter, 234 A.D.2d 422, 651 N.Y.S.2d 149 and Goodyear v. Weinstein, 224 A.D.2d 387, 638 N.Y.S.2d 108 described each of the default judgments therein as a 'nullity' ......